Author Topic: The ITV Drama  (Read 234803 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline grahameb

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 11830
Re: The ITV Drama
« Reply #2400 on: February 13, 2020, 12:37:PM »
I chose not to watch the drama as I knew from the start that it was just following the biased path of every other drama about the case that the msm habitually put on.

Offline Jan

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 10318
Re: The ITV Drama
« Reply #2401 on: February 13, 2020, 12:45:PM »
I believe that the series is based upon a book written by an author who is biased against Bamber? This in itself amounts to bad journalism. But to deliberately avoid the chief witness to the murders is in my opinion presumptuous to say the least.

yes it was - and that was quite clear.

the only good thing was seeing the house re-created - that was interesting .

But they missed out so much stuff . It was unbelievable .

Offline JackieD

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3879
Re: The ITV Drama
« Reply #2402 on: February 13, 2020, 12:46:PM »
Julie Mugfords lies again
Julie Mugford the main prosecution witness was guilty of numerous crimes, 13 separate cheque frauds, robbery, and drug dealing and also making a deal with a national newspaper before trial that if she could convince a jury her ex boyfriend was guilty of five murders she would receive £25,000

Offline JackieD

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3879
Re: The ITV Drama
« Reply #2403 on: February 13, 2020, 12:47:PM »
Retrial
Julie Mugford the main prosecution witness was guilty of numerous crimes, 13 separate cheque frauds, robbery, and drug dealing and also making a deal with a national newspaper before trial that if she could convince a jury her ex boyfriend was guilty of five murders she would receive £25,000

Offline David1819

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 13784
Re: The ITV Drama
« Reply #2404 on: February 13, 2020, 12:47:PM »
yes it was - and that was quite clear.

the only good thing was seeing the house re-created - that was interesting .

But they missed out so much stuff . It was unbelievable .

You'd have to consider budget restraints.  :-\  More stuff means hiring more actors.

Offline JackieD

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3879
Re: The ITV Drama
« Reply #2405 on: February 13, 2020, 12:52:PM »
Jeremy who masterminded this crime chose not to have a solicitor ?????
If he was guilty
« Last Edit: February 13, 2020, 01:25:PM by JackieD »
Julie Mugford the main prosecution witness was guilty of numerous crimes, 13 separate cheque frauds, robbery, and drug dealing and also making a deal with a national newspaper before trial that if she could convince a jury her ex boyfriend was guilty of five murders she would receive £25,000

Offline Jan

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 10318
Re: The ITV Drama
« Reply #2406 on: February 13, 2020, 12:52:PM »
You'd have to consider budget restraints.  :-\  More stuff means hiring more actors.

nothing about the jury querying the families testimony or whether they would gain financially
nothing about the family finding the silencer ( actors just shown sat watching )
about 3 minutes of Jeremys testimony
Nothing about the blood on the silencer ( could be an unknown actor playing the "expert"  )


And so much more .

Offline David1819

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 13784
Re: The ITV Drama
« Reply #2407 on: February 13, 2020, 12:56:PM »
nothing about the jury querying the families testimony or whether they would gain financially
nothing about the family finding the silencer ( actors just shown sat watching )
about 3 minutes of Jeremys testimony
Nothing about the blood on the silencer ( could be an unknown actor playing the "expert"  )


And so much more .

They had enough time for crispy being put down. But not enough time for the silencer?


Offline Jan

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 10318
Re: The ITV Drama
« Reply #2408 on: February 13, 2020, 01:18:PM »
They had enough time for crispy being put down. But not enough time for the silencer?



exactly - cheap animal labour

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48676
Re: The ITV Drama
« Reply #2409 on: February 13, 2020, 01:30:PM »
And now the vet's holding out on information  ::)

Offline JackieD

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3879
Re: The ITV Drama
« Reply #2410 on: February 13, 2020, 01:36:PM »
GOOD Morning Britain viewers were furious this morning as they accused Kate Garraway of “ruining” the end of White House Farm ahead of tonight’s finale.
Despite the true story being widely reported in the news, some viewers who hadn’t followed the crime were upset at the daytime show for revealing the outcome.


While announcing what was coming up later in the show, Kate Garraway said: “The true story of how Jeremy Bamber killed his family to inherit their fortune.
“This morning his former best friend joins us live with a new revelation about what he thinks really happened.”



However, the murderer’s friend failed to appear.


It prompted one viewer to fume on Twitter: “@GMB thanks for confirming Jeremy was the killer in White house farm before the final TONIGHT 🤦???some of us didnt know what happened!!!!”
Another wrote: “Thanks @GMB for ruining what happens next in White House Farm when I still need to catch up 🙈😤😂.”
“A third raged: Thanks to @GMB for ruining the end of White House Farm for me… final isn’t till this evening but you just have away the ending ??🤬 #whitehousefarm #goodmorningbritian.”
Julie Mugford the main prosecution witness was guilty of numerous crimes, 13 separate cheque frauds, robbery, and drug dealing and also making a deal with a national newspaper before trial that if she could convince a jury her ex boyfriend was guilty of five murders she would receive £25,000

Offline JackieD

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3879
Re: The ITV Drama
« Reply #2411 on: February 13, 2020, 01:37:PM »
I wonder why he didn’t appear.
I expect he has got a bigger money offer coming up
Julie Mugford the main prosecution witness was guilty of numerous crimes, 13 separate cheque frauds, robbery, and drug dealing and also making a deal with a national newspaper before trial that if she could convince a jury her ex boyfriend was guilty of five murders she would receive £25,000

Offline David1819

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 13784
Re: The ITV Drama
« Reply #2412 on: February 13, 2020, 01:47:PM »
Where did the idea of Brett Collins appearing on ITV come from? Is it actually happening or not?

Offline JackieD

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3879
Re: The ITV Drama
« Reply #2413 on: February 13, 2020, 02:00:PM »
Where did the idea of Brett Collins appearing on ITV come from? Is it actually happening or not?

They announced it and he must have actually been in the studio and then didn’t appear

The mystery is why
Julie Mugford the main prosecution witness was guilty of numerous crimes, 13 separate cheque frauds, robbery, and drug dealing and also making a deal with a national newspaper before trial that if she could convince a jury her ex boyfriend was guilty of five murders she would receive £25,000

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48676
Re: The ITV Drama
« Reply #2414 on: February 13, 2020, 02:07:PM »
nothing about the jury querying the families testimony or whether they would gain financially
nothing about the family finding the silencer ( actors just shown sat watching )
about 3 minutes of Jeremys testimony
Nothing about the blood on the silencer ( could be an unknown actor playing the "expert"  )


And so much more .






Nothing about the land purchase by Nevill that nobody knew about. Nevill had complained that John Eaton had overcharged, so a fight broke out and John Eaton punched Nevill causing him a black eye.

The land was left by the Eaton's father to peter and John Eaton----who preferred the money at the time one would imagine, so now they've got the best of both worlds.
Were they " the two " who Nevill" wouldn't turn his back on ?"