The ITV Drama

[Roch]

Write away Roch, I'm surprised you haven't yet - in fact, any supporter who hasn't - why not?

I thought you would say that about Venezis, were that the case, he's have corrected the issue of 'blood being present on her palms'.

I thought about palms Caroline. I see your point. I can only think his notes were sketchy then.

[JackieD]

OK I'll keep it short because my longer post got timed out and I lost it while trying to copy and paste 

Whatever was posted up, there was also a clearer image, better than anything in archive.  It serves no purpose to add something to an image that isn't in the original negative (as the original negative can just be referred back to).   

I would refute what you're saying re evidence and re TV companies.  I am not a custodian of evidence.  Where something is referenced, it could refer to material not on the forum or it could refer to material on the forum.  I'm afraid that's out of my control - such is life.  I think there is some kind of embargo on defence programs for this case.  Nothing official.

If PV was supposed to note every single thing, all I can say is: either he hasn't done that (for reasons unknown) OR his notes were re-written to exclude certain things.  This is not just SC related.

Re the sightings, I may write to JB for the first time ever, regarding whether images are being held back by the defence i.e. images that would explain the sightings.

Please do, it’s time

[JackieD]

OK I'll keep it short because my longer post got timed out and I lost it while trying to copy and paste 

Whatever was posted up, there was also a clearer image, better than anything in archive.  It serves no purpose to add something to an image that isn't in the original negative (as the original negative can just be referred back to).   

I would refute what you're saying re evidence and re TV companies.  I am not a custodian of evidence.  Where something is referenced, it could refer to material not on the forum or it could refer to material on the forum.  I'm afraid that's out of my control - such is life.  I think there is some kind of embargo on defence programs for this case.  Nothing official.

If PV was supposed to note every single thing, all I can say is: either he hasn't done that (for reasons unknown)his notes were re-written to exclude certain things.  This is not just SC related.

Re the sightings, I may write to JB for the first time ever, regarding whether images are being held back by the defence i.e. images that would explain the sightings.

Re the embargo you refer to, it seems the newspapers can lie about the type of letters JB sent to CAL (this is bearing in mind all JB letters are read by the prison). Cal will happily go along with the lies if it helps sell a few more books)
She has days now to say the bombshell headlines are not true yet has failed to take any action. Yet when MWT is desperate to visit JB in prison to discuss further action on his case he is not allowed ??

[Jan]

He was well up on the situation with the wills though, wasn't he?

I don’t understand your argument . My parents have given me a copy of their wills ? What is your point ? You would expect  jeremy and sheila to inherit ?

[Jan]

I know there was some controversy about the hand swabs but do we know if under the nails were checked on any of the victims ?

[lookout]

Unless RWB had been told where the key to the safe was, he certainly found it ! They found everything didn't they ?

[Steve_uk]

I don’t understand your argument . My parents have given me a copy of their wills ? What is your point ? You would expect  jeremy and sheila to inherit ?

Well I'm surprised at this post. Not only was Jeremy tied to a job he yearned to be free from as long as his father lived he had the added bonus of becoming sole beneficiary should all five die in one go.

[lookout]

I know there was some controversy about the hand swabs but do we know if under the nails were checked on any of the victims ?

No---none were taken unfortunately as I think they'd have each had one another's blood/skin beneath them.

[Kaldin]

Conditional Wills are never a good idea IMO.

[Jane]

Conditional Wills are never a good idea IMO.

It's my understanding that whilst anyone can attach conditions to their wills, it's entirely up to the recipient whether or not they're carried out.

[Kaldin]

It's my understanding that whilst anyone can attach conditions to their wills, it's entirely up to the recipient whether or not they're carried out.

I realise that, but it's putting pressure on the recipient, and if they don't like the conditions they have to choose between the dosh and doing something they don't want to do.

I don't know if that was Nevill's intention. It might be that he thought Jeremy would need more money than Sheila if he was going to keep the farm running.

[Jane]

I realise that, but it's putting pressure on the recipient, and if they don't like the conditions they have to choose between the dosh and doing something they don't want to do.

I don't know if that was Nevill's intention. It might be that he thought Jeremy would need more money than Sheila if he was going to keep the farm running.

Or he thought it was a way to keep him there?

[Kaldin]

Or he thought it was a way to keep him there?

If Jeremy didn't keep farming, he would still get half of it.

Whatever the reason, it's never a good idea.

[Jane]

If Jeremy didn't keep farming, he would still get half of it.

Whatever the reason, it's never a good idea.

Half may not have been enough, though. I agree, it was an appalling idea to which only the most dutiful would have adhered to.

[Kaldin]

Half may not have been enough, though. I agree, it was an appalling idea to which only the most dutiful would have adhered to.

I'm talking about it from Nevill's point of view. If he hadn't died that night, Sheila might have thought his Will was unfair. It's not as if he cut Jeremy out if he didn't keep farming, he simply divided his assets between them, which is fairly normal.