0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
I do believe he had a beer or two in his house when he got in.
I have seen a lot of people on social media taking interest in the case and I totally understand it is a drama but by saying it’s based on real life and factual scenes mixed with drama is confusing for the viewer . They are watching and not knowing which bits are true and which bits are based on dramatic interpretation. Apparently Essex police who by the authors account co-operated with her fully are NOT happy about how Taff jones has been portrayed. I said before I find it interesting on how jeremy is portrayed and we know he is a different character depending on whose statements you read , but again the viewer does not know that . Some things that may seem small or insignificant that are being missed actually might be quite important in the bigger picture. To be honest I would be happier if the question of guilt was just more open , nothing more than that . Just leaving the viewer questioning things more . But so far we have a bungling police force and a pantomime Jeremy and a shrinking violet Julie , and I think it has been going more that way as things have progressed.
Jeremy didn't actually have supper or whatever with the rest of the family that night did he? Didn't he say he had something standing up (a sandwich)?
Probably.
These campaigners against JB are mostly just emotionally invested imbeciles. Who think what they are doing is good.I have spent a lot of time refuting and debunking claims made by those who think Steven Avery is innocent. In doing so I have been accused of being a paid shill, accused of being Ken Kratz (the prosecutor) Accused of making up the letters that Steven Avery wrote, you name it. As you well know, I am not any of the above. I got involved because I know Steven Avery is guilty of murder and Netflix was spreading the most appauling disinformation about a total piece of sh*t. Campaigners against JB feel the same way about JB as I do about Steven Avery. Only difference is I have my facts right about who I accuse, they do not.
Because he was a 24 year old man who hadn't lived with Mummy for around 5 years and it would have been less bother to get in his car and drive off to be with the locals and have a laugh than to trek up to the farm house to waste valuable drinking time with June.
or just as easy to have supper with mum then go and have a couple of pints. although i doubt that happened as it was a very busy time on the farm at that time of year wasnt it
Are you arguing generally or about one night in particular? We know that on THAT night he stood up in the kitchen and ate a sandwich whilst the family sat round the table.
umm you don’t know anything for a fact. this is only your opinion on both cases. nothing more nothing less. get off your high horse. whoever do you think you are sherlock!
i think generally he would have had supper at his mums or at least ate one meal a day there. he worked long hours on the farm so probably wouldn’t have felt much like making dinner after work. have i confused things
http://jeremybamberforum.co.uk/index.php/topic,9730.msg475953.html#msg475953
And I think -because he didn't get on with June. May even have seen her as prying, and according to Adam, they were on very poor speaking terms- it's likely he'd have been out of there like a bat out of hell. He wouldn't be the only young man who preferred the company in the local to the intolerance of a parent. The long hours you speak of would only have been at harvest time.