Author Topic: The ITV Drama  (Read 234770 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Jane

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 33781
Re: The ITV Drama
« Reply #1905 on: January 30, 2020, 04:22:PM »




He still relied on mum to feed him. All he had in his 'fridge on the day of the murders was a piece of curled up bacon.

But he had an excellent pub within sight of his cottage. I hugely doubt that he relied on June to feed him.

Offline Adam

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 44410
Re: The ITV Drama
« Reply #1906 on: January 30, 2020, 04:26:PM »
The blood stains say otherwise. Had she been slow a lot more blood would have accumulated in one area.

Your version of events now has June being shot five times but taking a rest before she decides to escape or get help and Nevill containing his blood so he can spill it all outside the bedroom.

June didn't take a rest. She was sleeping when shot.

Then crawled towards the phone which was not useable. But if you believe she walked, fine.

This is what the drama said. Who engaged with CAL. Assume both are wrong again & June was going to the box room. Then changed her mind.
« Last Edit: January 30, 2020, 04:27:PM by Adam »
'Only I know what really happened that night'.



Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48676
Re: The ITV Drama
« Reply #1909 on: January 30, 2020, 05:17:PM »
So why the need to remove them ?

Offline Adam

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 44410
Re: The ITV Drama
« Reply #1910 on: January 30, 2020, 08:22:PM »
So why the need to remove them ?

The bedroom phone was plugged into the kitchen socket because that is where Nevill was.

A phone in the bedroom will have people asking why Nevill or June did not use the bedroom phone.

The original plan would have been to have Nevill on the bedroom floor and bedroom phone in the bedroom, off the hook.
'Only I know what really happened that night'.

Offline Jan

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 10318
Re: The ITV Drama
« Reply #1911 on: January 30, 2020, 09:17:PM »
June didn't take a rest. She was sleeping when shot.

Then crawled towards the phone which was not useable. But if you believe she walked, fine.

This is what the drama said. Who engaged with CAL. Assume both are wrong again & June was going to the box room. Then changed her mind.

The drama is full of misrepresentations . And that’s putting it mildly .

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48676
Re: The ITV Drama
« Reply #1912 on: January 30, 2020, 09:20:PM »
It was Junes droplets of blood that were found beneath the box-room window.

Offline Reader

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2456
Re: The ITV Drama
« Reply #1913 on: January 30, 2020, 11:27:PM »
Where is that stated?

Offline Adam

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 44410
Re: The ITV Drama
« Reply #1914 on: January 30, 2020, 11:45:PM »
Where is that stated?

In Lookouts gut feeling.
'Only I know what really happened that night'.

Offline JackieD

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3879
Re: The ITV Drama
« Reply #1915 on: January 30, 2020, 11:46:PM »
The drama is full of misrepresentations . And that’s putting it mildly .

The producers had that chance to put together a brilliant drama and they blew it

If they had put something today which represented the truth and highlighted the hearsay taken as evidence then that could have been a block buster in there hands
Julie Mugford the main prosecution witness was guilty of numerous crimes, 13 separate cheque frauds, robbery, and drug dealing and also making a deal with a national newspaper before trial that if she could convince a jury her ex boyfriend was guilty of five murders she would receive £25,000

Offline Steve_uk

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 21102
Re: The ITV Drama
« Reply #1916 on: January 30, 2020, 11:53:PM »
The producers had that chance to put together a brilliant drama and they blew it

If they had put something today which represented the truth and highlighted the hearsay taken as evidence then that could have been a block buster in there hands
They can't risk being sued though. The ITV drama is what it is, warts and all.

Offline David1819

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 13783
Re: The ITV Drama
« Reply #1917 on: January 31, 2020, 12:00:AM »
The bedroom phone was plugged into the kitchen socket because that is where Nevill was.

A phone in the bedroom will have people asking why Nevill or June did not use the bedroom phone.

The original plan would have been to have Nevill on the bedroom floor and bedroom phone in the bedroom, off the hook.

Adam. Read the statement. The bedroom phone was seen installed in the Kitchen on August 5th. It was already down there.  And yes Bob Woffindon was a moron.




http://jeremybamberforum.co.uk/index.php/topic,1107.msg34237.html#msg34237

Offline Adam

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 44410
Re: The ITV Drama
« Reply #1918 on: January 31, 2020, 06:54:AM »
Adam. Read the statement. The bedroom phone was seen installed in the Kitchen on August 5th. It was already down there.  And yes Bob Woffindon was a moron.




http://jeremybamberforum.co.uk/index.php/topic,1107.msg34237.html#msg34237

You said earlier David.

As said, obviously the bedroom phone was in the bedroom on the massacre night. The working kitchen phone in the kitchen.

Bamber disabled the phones upon entrance. As said by CAL & Bob Woffinden.

June was not able to use it & crawled back to where she was found. As said by CAL and the TV drama.

Bamber moved the bedroom phone back to the kitchen near Nevill.
'Only I know what really happened that night'.

Offline Adam

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 44410
Re: The ITV Drama
« Reply #1919 on: January 31, 2020, 08:50:AM »
Julie did know there was a 'last number dialled' phone at WHF.

Bamber must have mentioned this to her in general conversation.
'Only I know what really happened that night'.