The ITV Drama

[Roch]

Probably like Sheila’s ability to move after the first shot as well Roch?

I think the injuries Sheila sustained occurred in a struggle with June, prior to her receiving the first shot.  Yes, if she was mobile at all after that first shot, I can't imagine her being very physical.

[lookout]

In the drama it clearly showed that it was made to look like JB's decision, purposely !

It didn't occur to these airheads that if JB had murdered his family that also shooting a dog was something he wasn't averse at doing too.

[David1819]

by the sounds of things I am not missing much.

[Roch]

by the sounds of things I am not missing much.

I haven't watched it but its shocking they can get away with making and broadcasting it. Speaks volumes about the ethics and the control of our media. 

[David1819]

I haven't watched it but its shocking they can get away with making and broadcasting it. Speaks volumes about the ethics and the control of our media.

Is there not a disclaimer at the beginning saying they have made stuff up?

[lookout]

There should have been a notice outside the trial court-----" only those who are prepared to lie may enter ".
Same applies to this " drama " !

[lookout]

Is there not a disclaimer at the beginning saying they have made stuff up?

There is even a Frankie ? Who's he ?

[Roch]

Is there not a disclaimer at the beginning saying they have made stuff up?

Ha ha maybe there should be. It should say 'adapted from such and such book'.

In a contentious case like this, viewers should be given a contrasting one-off documentary that explores current defence arguments (without hampering any proceedings).  Then at least they have a comparison. But there seems to be a block on such programs being made. It's frightening when you consider the implications, re our media.

[lookout]

It's never been written anywhere where it states that JB was standing watching Crispy being put to sleep.
Disgusting !

[David1819]

Ha ha maybe there should be. It should say 'adapted from such and such book'.

In a contentious case like this, viewers should be given a contrasting one-off documentary that explores current defence arguments (without hampering any proceedings).  Then at least they have a comparison. But there seems to be a block on such programs being made. It's frightening when you consider the implications, re our media.

The target audience for this type of drama will have forgotten all about it by summer.

[JackieD]

Was the dog put in the shed by Jeremy and shot by the vet

It’s a yes or no answer

Silence from Caroline

[guest7363]

AE took the dog to the vet---it wasn't put to sleep as has been portrayed.
This was after police had taken the dog to JB's house and where both AE and JB had said they didn't want it.

Again Lookout I go by Anne’s statement The Dog he had put down?

http://jeremybamberforum.co.uk/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=497.0;attach=1559

The Bambertweets make no mention of the fact Anne was responsible, they make other comments

WhiteHouseFarm #ITV Drama - #JeremyBamber The decision to have June Bamber's dog put down with the vet's agreement was a difficult one, but the kindest thing to do. Crispy was very old and in a great deal of distress after the tragedy. www.jeremy-bamber.co…


http://jeremybamberforum.co.uk/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=5816.0;attach=37807

[guest7363]

Silence from Caroline

Re: Conflicting Statements
« Reply #959 on: January 09, 2020, 10:46:AM »
QuoteModifyRemove
Quote from: David1819 on January 09, 2020, 10:42:AM
"Jeremy and Julie returned to Bourtree Cottage shortly before a vet arrived to put Crispy to sleep. ‘I know that Jeremy had asked a number of his family if they would like the dog but none wanted it,’ Julie recalled. Jeremy told the vet that the dog had been very attached to his mother and had turned a bit nasty since the killings."

"After lunch, Jeremy and Julie collected Bruce the labrador and left him with the vet in Maldon, who had found him a new home on another farm."



That's the trivial matter sorted.
Thanks David, so he got rid of both dogs, not Anne

[Caroline]

Ha ha maybe there should be. It should say 'adapted from such and such book'.

In a contentious case like this, viewers should be given a contrasting one-off documentary that explores current defence arguments (without hampering any proceedings).  Then at least they have a comparison. But there seems to be a block on such programs being made. It's frightening when you consider the implications, re our media.

It states clearly that some scenes have been created. Never seen so many people getting their knickers in a twist when from the start, you all knew it was a drama. Yes, some scenes have been changed but other than a few things like Ann Eaton being at dinner the day Sheila arrived etc. stuff that makes no odds to the outcome - what actually didn't happen? I don't see any of you lot complaining when the CT post their BS -  but then you wouldn't would you? (Not specifically aimed at you Roch).

[guest7363]

Was the dog put in the shed by Jeremy and shot by the vet

It’s a yes or no answer

Shot?