The ITV Drama

[David1819]

You think repeating you be will make it true but the fact is, all it serves is to fuel the likes of the crazy element of which you now belong. You used to be a good poster David, now you’re just an immature idiot. No matter what rubbish you keep posting, you won’t alter the FACT that Jane knows someone who was involved in the case from day one and no one cares whether you believe it or not - you’re not relevant.

Geez.. take it easy on the projection.

[Jane]

I've said it before, but the tag-teaming between three or four people is what's causing the disruption.

So are you advocating those who think he's guilty sit back and allow themselves to be continuously ridiculed and attacked?

[Kaldin]

So are you advocating those who think he's guilty sit back and allow themselves to be continuously ridiculed and attacked?

There's no need for all the other "guilters" to join in and slag someone off to each other.

[sami]

team tagging is going on because the trolls dont learn their lesson,try and be polite when answering each others posts .if you cant than expect other decent members to pull you up on your remarks,i dont follow anyone but will reply to any insult or goading done to a fellow member.thats the way i am,also makes goaders think twice before posting

[Jane]

There's no need for all the other "guilters" to join in and slag someone off to each other.

Oh! Right! So the one -the anti-Bamber- who's being attacked has to sit back and accept it?

[lookout]

There's no need for all the other "guilters" to join in and slag someone off to each other.

Agreed Kaldin, others should butt out when an argument/discussion is between just 2 people.

[lookout]

It solves nothing and only creates hostilities. Like Trump interfering in Iran !

[Caroline]

There's no need for all the other "guilters" to join in and slag someone off to each other.

Sorry - I don’t see you criticisms of Jackie when she joins in - depends what side you’re on to what you find acceptable doesn’t it Kaldin?

[Jane]

Agreed Kaldin, others should butt out when an argument/discussion is between just 2 people.

Lookout, are you saying it's FINE for two supporters to provoke one detractor, but no other detractors should lend their voice to it?

[JackieD]

So Sami isn’t trolling!

2011 and anyone is quite welcome to write to him and ask about me
I am sure he will give a polite answer
I will always continue to support him
We have spoken many times on the phone and by letter but I have never asked to meet him

How funny RJ (friend of the relatives) that you have to go back to 2011 to bring up a post about Jeremy and I And yet I get attacked for bringing up the old ridiculous posts of Caroline attacking people when she thought he was guilty

Your posts continue not to be impartial and a joke

I will help you out and drag out a few posts from Caroline this afternoon

[JackieD]

RJ, thank-you. I understand, from a variety of those who have contacted Jeremy, that he's very practiced at avoiding those questions he'd rather not answer, and dumping those he has no further use for. From where he is, it's easy to make promises. There are many ways in which we can let each other down if our needs cease to gel.

He has never dodged a single question from me and these questions have been taken off this forum Fact

[Caroline]

Geez.. take it easy on the projection.

Look - David learned a new word from Steph and has done it to death ever since. You’re like a sponge soaking up the ideas of others and passing them off as your own. Do tell us again when you became knowledgeable about the case - aww sorry. I forgot, that depends on who your talking to. 

[JackieD]

You think repeating you be will make it true but the fact is, all it serves is to fuel the likes of the crazy element of which you now belong. You used to be a good poster David, now you’re just an immature idiot. No matter what rubbish you keep posting, you won’t alter the FACT that Jane knows someone who was involved in the case from day one and no one cares whether you believe it or not - you’re not relevant.

Course she does

[Jane]

2011 and anyone is quite welcome to write to him and ask about me
I am sure he will give a polite answer
I will always continue to support him
We have spoken many times on the phone and by letter but I have never asked to meet him

How funny RJ (friend of the relatives) that you have to go back to 2011 to bring up a post about Jeremy and I And yet I get attacked for bringing up the old ridiculous posts of Caroline attacking people when she thought he was guilty

Your posts continue not to be impartial and a joke

I will help you out and drag out a few posts from Caroline this afternoon

I'll put money on your's being of way more interest. People in glass houses?

[JackieD]

I've said it before, but the tag-teaming between three or four people is what's causing the disruption.

Thank you Kaldin it’s a gang