The ITV Drama

[David1819]

Roch, I can understand how Jane feels, I had the privilege of talking to Bambers psychiatrist, NGB I know believes me because she is involved with something else in my life, I didn’t want to discuss names, but I was willing to share part what she said, because I came forward with this information, I just got goaded and ridiculed especially from David, I’ve learnt my lesson and I bet Jane has.

[David1819]

As for my cartoons and gifs. How many guilters complained or criticised me over this one?

http://jeremybamberforum.co.uk/index.php/topic,10006.msg456443.html#msg456443

None! Strange that. 

[Caroline]

As for my cartoons and gifs. How many guilters complained or criticised me over this one?

http://jeremybamberforum.co.uk/index.php/topic,10006.msg456443.html#msg456443

None! Strange that. 

Absolute BS! You have been told time and time again about posting the RG gif!

[David1819]

I have them both on ignore Sami, I held back from David, he told untruths about his rifle usage to NGB and Scipio but I never posted it.

I used a Lee–Enfield when I was in the airforce cadets at age 14.

[David1819]

If Jane's source is to be believed, an officer who worked on the case could sense that Jeremy was lying during interviews.  This Tyzack fellow seems to be advocating almost the opposite, ie that Essex Police have been dishonest and obstructive (while claiming to have cooperated). Oh to have been a fly on the wall regarding internal arguments eh.

Jane has claimed all sorts of connections to the case. Connections that she oddly never seemed to mention while she believed Jeremy was not guilty of murders.

We are supposed to believe that Jane spent 28 years believing the guy was innocent despite being "surrounded" by local witnesses who have nothing good to say about the guy. Then only to start believing the guy is guilty because of someone 300 miles away up north?

Something doesn't seem quite right there. 

[sami]

what would airforce cadets be doing firing rifles,they are only issued with a sidearm a revolverwhen they are up in the air.cant see a 14yr old firing live rounds

[sami]

what makes people change their minds you would never know

[sami]

lets see if you get banned for todays goading by cartoon

[guest7363]

what would airforce cadets be doing firing rifles,they are only issued with a sidearm a revolverwhen they are up in the air.cant see a 14yr old firing live rounds

True Sami, he told Scipio he had used other firearms and used them at his Grandads, yet he told NGB he had only used this one, now he says he used it at cadets? 



I've used several rifles myself belonging to my granddad all manual they are not rocket science to work out

[David1819]

what would airforce cadets be doing firing rifles,they are only issued with a sidearm a revolverwhen they are up in the air.cant see a 14yr old firing live rounds

Why make us learn to use a rifle designed 100 years ago?  I found it so pointless.

For some reason you had to become good at the Lee-Enfield till they let you use SA80. I didn't stay long enough for that.

[Roch]

It's just his opinion - he wasn't involved in the case and we don't know why he hold those thoughts.

It's not nothing. It's someone with ten years as a detective working major crimes, in the same force. If anything it's quite embarrassing for EP and for the original officers involved the prosecution.  We don't know his reasons. However, for him to be so openly critical, and to reveal he internally argued the case using reason, suggests he had sufficient awareness of case facts to warrant such actions. The fact he has referred to a stubbornness among EP to listen to reason, suggests the case is very sensitive for EP and they obviously have something to hide or lose.

[David1819]

It's not nothing. It's someone with ten years as a detective working major crimes, in the same force. If anything it's quite embarrassing for EP and for the original officers involved the prosecution.  We don't know his reasons. However, for him to be so openly critical, and to reveal he internally argued the case using reason, suggests he had sufficient awareness of case facts to warrant such actions. The fact he has referred to a stubbornness among EP to listen to reason, suggests the case is very sensitive for EP and they obviously have something to hide or lose.

Who is this we are talking about?

[Roch]

Who is this we are talking about?

A retired detective (Met & EP) has left a comment on change.Org, claiming he has had heated discussions inside EP, with regards to the Bamber case being one of the worst cases of UK injustice. Name is Tyzack.

[JackieD]

Ha, ha!!!!!!!!!!! As much as you with your Twitter account? Go and wool pull some place else!

Jane's policeman is VERY real - how Warwick? 

Talk about double standards

Jane comes up with a mystery policeman in reply to an actual policeman

Not only that she is calling me a troll which is a banning affence

I am the one that is being trolled and I have every email and proof fact

Now you are trolling by  trying to make out that Warwick Heslop does not exist
I see him at least 3 times a week
That is a fact
You are making a mockery of this whole forum

[JackieD]

Jane has claimed all sorts of connections to the case. Connections that she oddly never seemed to mention while she believed Jeremy was not guilty of murders.

We are supposed to believe that Jane spent 28 years believing the guy was innocent despite being "surrounded" by local witnesses who have nothing good to say about the guy. Then only to start believing the guy is guilty because of someone 300 miles away up north?

Something doesn't seem quite right there. 

Exactly David excellent post