I have just read what Colin said about the drama . And he accuses jeremy of accusing Sheila of all sorts of things . And he said the sad thing was that sheila was happy at the time of the murders and in a good place. However when you read his first statement he admits sheila had been violent in the past talks about her breakdowns and also his description of her the night before and on the drive to the farm does not portray her as being happy and in a good place.
Now I appreciate he must have been in shock at the time and I dont think any of us could appreciate what he went through with the press as well . It must have been horrendous . But in his first statement he does not seem to defend sheila at all . He seems to accept what the police have told him . Which you would do in the circumstances.
I have always said whatever the truth the whole case is a tragedy and of course he is free to try and put his side of the story . But I am surprised in a way because we have all heard about the appeals which seem to amount to nothing . I just wonder why now ?
Generally speaking, none of us are 100% anything 100% of the time. Whilst it may well be true that Sheila was in a better place than she'd previously been, he was also aware that WHF was one of her least favourite places to be. It's understandable then, that she may not have been looking forward to it. Colin also had, on his person, a letter he planned to give to Nevill, but changed his mind. He won't have given more than a basic outline in what he's said about the drama so naturally some -many- things are likely to have been left out.
