I really do become frightfully confused about all these alleged hidden documents. IF they're hidden, how does anyone know what's in them, and if they KNOW what's in them there must have been a point at which they were public knowledge. Having said that, if they HAD been public knowledge what's the point of hiding them now? On the other hand IF there is anything incriminating, surely it stands to reason that such wouldn't be hidden. It simply would never have existed in the first place.
How do we know what's in them ? That's easy. Did not " Taff "Jones make notes,etc at the beginning based on his findings ? If so, where are they ?
If there was anything incriminating towards JB they would have been received with glee by SJ, and that goes for everything else that's hidden from view. It IS in the interests of the public to see/know about this.