Jeremy Bamber proven innocent?

[lookout]

Which makes it an even bigger laughing stock!

So you'd do nothing if you'd been wronged ?

[lookout]

This is done to prove innocence beyond reasonable doubt. Not even the judge's closing words contained that phrase when he was pronounced guilty.

[Caroline]

So you'd do nothing if you'd been wronged ?

If  I was genuinely innocent, I wouldn't be claiming I called the police at 03:25 one minute and that West was a liar;  and at another that he wrote down the correct time all along and that time was 03:36.

[Caroline]

This is done to prove innocence beyond reasonable doubt. Not even the judge's closing words contained that phrase when he was pronounced guilty.

But this recent claim doesn't prove anything of the sort!

[lookout]

If  I was genuinely innocent, I wouldn't be claiming I called the police at 03:25 one minute and that West was a liar;  and at another that he wrote down the correct time all along and that time was 03:36.

West wasn't altogether honest in all this. Come to think, none of them were particularly professional in what they did.

[Caroline]

West wasn't altogether honest in all this. Come to think, none of them were particularly professional in what they did.

What lie did West tell?

[lookout]

What lie did West tell?

In his statement West said he'd told Bonnett that at 03.26 that he'd received a call from Nevill, which he'd  relayed to Bonnett. West then told Dickinson that he'd received JB's call at 03.26 then in a statement in September he said he didn't receive JB's call until 03.36. What's all this about ?

[Jane]

In his statement West said he'd told Bonnett that at 03.26 that he'd received a call from Nevill, which he'd  relayed to Bonnett. West then told Dickinson that he'd received JB's call at 03.26 then in a statement in September he said he didn't receive JB's call until 03.36. What's all this about ?

And when we add Jeremy's own 'confusion' over the timing of his calls..........................

[Caroline]

In his statement West said he'd told Bonnett that at 03.26 that he'd received a call from Nevill, which he'd  relayed to Bonnett. West then told Dickinson that he'd received JB's call at 03.26 then in a statement in September he said he didn't receive JB's call until 03.36. What's all this about ?

Please find the statement in which West said he received a call from Nevill? 

[lookout]

Please find the statement in which West said he received a call from Nevill? 

Well it's on the forum somewhere.

[lookout]

Find West's statements.

[Caroline]

Well it's on the forum somewhere.

I have read his statement many times and at NO POINT does he state that he received a call from Nevill. The ONLY call he received, was from Jeremy!

[Caroline]

If he had said he received a call from Nevill, he'd have been cross examined on it and Bamber could never havre been convicted. Sorry Lookout, but after all this time, his can you not know this?

[lookout]

As DS Ainsley stated in a closing letter referring to West :
 I quote " In addition he gave the appearance of not knowing his evidence and had to be reminded by defence council of the content of his statement.
Overall his outward appearance was spoiled by his lack of respect for the court and his obvious lack of preparation for the occasion ", unquote.

[Jane]

As DS Ainsley stated in a closing letter referring to West :
 I quote " In addition he gave the appearance of not knowing his evidence and had to be reminded by defence council of the content of his statement.
Overall his outward appearance was spoiled by his lack of respect for the court and his obvious lack of preparation for the occasion ", unquote.

But he didn't, despite "his lack of preparation for the occasion" say he'd received a call from Nevill.