Author Topic: the shooting party in scotland.  (Read 12072 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline scipio_usmc

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 9502
Re: the shooting party in scotland.
« Reply #15 on: May 30, 2014, 08:03:PM »
It's a complete myth that Sheila had no experience of guns. Photographs which not only showed Sheila holding the guns,,but she was also shown how to fire them,,including a shotgun,while on her holiday in Scotland.
Sheila had also taken part in target practice too,,and it appeared that she had used firearms on a number of occasions over the years because of her life on the farm.
Don't forget,,the shots which were fired on the night of the murders were little more than a foot away, some contact at point blank range.

If Jeremy had carried out the shootings,,he would have aimed straight at the heads while they were all in bed and they would have been found that way,,and not where they were found,,as they wouldn't have been able to move anywhere.

Post evidence.  The family's testimony was not as anyone on this site tries to pretend.  After repeated questioning th ebest police would get them to say is maybe she visited Scotland though didn't shoot.

No workers on the farm or any of the extended family saw her shoot on the farm nor did Jeremy according to his own statement.

You are making it up that for sure she shot on the farm.

You always make claims without care ot their turht or even thinking before you post. 
Politeness is organized indifference- Paul Valéry

Offline nugnug

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 17172
    • http://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CDMQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fjohnnyvoid.wordpress.com%2F&ei=WTdUUo3IM6mY0QWYz4GADg&usg=AFQjCNE-8xtZuPAZ52VkntYOokH5da5MIA&bvm=bv.5353710
Re: the shooting party in scotland.
« Reply #16 on: May 30, 2014, 08:11:PM »
thats not what you said on the other thread i think your making it up as you go along.

and ive yet to see you post any evedence for your cliams.
« Last Edit: May 30, 2014, 08:12:PM by nugnug »

guest154

  • Guest
Re: the shooting party in scotland.
« Reply #17 on: May 30, 2014, 08:14:PM »
It's a complete myth that Sheila had no experience of guns. Photographs which not only showed Sheila holding the guns,,but she was also shown how to fire them,,including a shotgun,while on her holiday in Scotland.
Sheila had also taken part in target practice too,,and it appeared that she had used firearms on a number of occasions over the years because of her life on the farm.
Don't forget,,the shots which were fired on the night of the murders were little more than a foot away, some contact at point blank range.

If Jeremy had carried out the shootings,,he would have aimed straight at the heads while they were all in bed and they would have been found that way,,and not where they were found,,as they wouldn't have been able to move anywhere.

Not that you care, but yet again none of this is true.

Offline scipio_usmc

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 9502
Re: the shooting party in scotland.
« Reply #18 on: May 30, 2014, 08:19:PM »
thats not what you said on the other thread i think your making it up as you go along.

and ive yet to see you post any evedence for your cliams.

post my words that supposedly diverge.

you say she went to Scotland the burned rests with you to estbalish it I have no need to prove a negative.

Read Jeremy's statement, it is a fact that Jeremy wrte in a statement the has not seen his sister fire a weapon. Read the statements from the family it is well known they said she had no interest in guns.
It is well known they said they didn't see her go shooting with them.

The best anyone here could come up with wa s asentence tha twas stricken because the person giving the statement did not approve of the statement and said it was inaccurately written down.  They had no desire o retype it so left it and just struck it.  This stricken sentence is th ebest anyone can point to to suggest she went shooting.  If anyone actually claimed it then a striscken sentence would not be relied upon but rather a sentence actually sworn to. 
Politeness is organized indifference- Paul Valéry

Offline nugnug

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 17172
    • http://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CDMQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fjohnnyvoid.wordpress.com%2F&ei=WTdUUo3IM6mY0QWYz4GADg&usg=AFQjCNE-8xtZuPAZ52VkntYOokH5da5MIA&bvm=bv.5353710
Re: the shooting party in scotland.
« Reply #19 on: May 30, 2014, 08:36:PM »
you demand sources but never post any yourself.

were is this statement from jeremy.
« Last Edit: May 30, 2014, 08:38:PM by nugnug »

Offline scipio_usmc

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 9502
Re: the shooting party in scotland.
« Reply #20 on: May 30, 2014, 08:41:PM »
you demand sources but never post any yourself.

were is this statement from jeremy.

My sources are the statements.   
Politeness is organized indifference- Paul Valéry

Offline nugnug

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 17172
    • http://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CDMQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fjohnnyvoid.wordpress.com%2F&ei=WTdUUo3IM6mY0QWYz4GADg&usg=AFQjCNE-8xtZuPAZ52VkntYOokH5da5MIA&bvm=bv.5353710
Re: the shooting party in scotland.
« Reply #21 on: May 30, 2014, 08:42:PM »
wich statements where you mean the statements on here.

has anyone else read this in the statements.
« Last Edit: May 30, 2014, 08:43:PM by nugnug »

Offline nugnug

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 17172
    • http://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CDMQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fjohnnyvoid.wordpress.com%2F&ei=WTdUUo3IM6mY0QWYz4GADg&usg=AFQjCNE-8xtZuPAZ52VkntYOokH5da5MIA&bvm=bv.5353710
Re: the shooting party in scotland.
« Reply #22 on: May 30, 2014, 09:01:PM »

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48643
Re: the shooting party in scotland.
« Reply #23 on: May 30, 2014, 09:34:PM »
 The very fact that the three adults were found in various or a different place,means that they were able to move after two or three shots,,as they didn't hit any targeted area of their bodies.

Sorry about this. Jeremy would have made short work of it if it had been him.Quick,swift and out,,but this massacre had been a long drawn-out session ,(,for want of a better word.)

Offline nugnug

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 17172
    • http://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CDMQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fjohnnyvoid.wordpress.com%2F&ei=WTdUUo3IM6mY0QWYz4GADg&usg=AFQjCNE-8xtZuPAZ52VkntYOokH5da5MIA&bvm=bv.5353710
Re: the shooting party in scotland.
« Reply #24 on: May 30, 2014, 09:48:PM »
i very much doubt if jeremy had shot the lot of them and tried to make it look like suicide he would make a statment saying hed never seen shiela use a gun.

so guilty or innocent i don't believe such a statement was made.

Offline tyler

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2395
Re: the shooting party in scotland.
« Reply #25 on: May 30, 2014, 10:24:PM »
A photograph of Sheila holding a gun DOES exist and I have seen it. However,it turned out that they were modelling photographs. Sheila did attend one of the shooting parties in Scotland,DB testified to this in court (after beating around the bush) but said that he didn't see her shoot. PE admitted in a statement that he had seen Sheila use a gun but this did not make the final statement. And it is worth remembering AE's comment "I can picture Sheila running amok with a shotgun,but not with a rifle"

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48643
Re: the shooting party in scotland.
« Reply #26 on: May 30, 2014, 10:36:PM »
Not that you care, but yet again none of this is true.





Try reading what DB has to say on Jeremy Bamber Campaign for Freedom link ! Documented.

What do you mean," not that I care ?",you nasty individual !

Offline nugnug

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 17172
    • http://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CDMQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fjohnnyvoid.wordpress.com%2F&ei=WTdUUo3IM6mY0QWYz4GADg&usg=AFQjCNE-8xtZuPAZ52VkntYOokH5da5MIA&bvm=bv.5353710
Re: the shooting party in scotland.
« Reply #27 on: May 30, 2014, 10:38:PM »
A photograph of Sheila holding a gun DOES exist and I have seen it. However,it turned out that they were modelling photographs. Sheila did attend one of the shooting parties in Scotland,DB testified to this in court (after beating around the bush) but said that he didn't see her shoot. PE admitted in a statement that he had seen Sheila use a gun but this did not make the final statement. And it is worth remembering AE's comment "I can picture Sheila running amok with a shotgun,but not with a rifle"

so that pretty much confirms she was at a shooting party and she did shoot.

Offline nugnug

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 17172
    • http://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CDMQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fjohnnyvoid.wordpress.com%2F&ei=WTdUUo3IM6mY0QWYz4GADg&usg=AFQjCNE-8xtZuPAZ52VkntYOokH5da5MIA&bvm=bv.5353710
Re: the shooting party in scotland.
« Reply #28 on: May 30, 2014, 10:41:PM »




Try reading what DB has to say on Jeremy Bamber Campaign for Freedom link ! Documented.

What do you mean," not that I care ?",you nasty individual !

thanks lookout ill go find it and post it.

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48643
Re: the shooting party in scotland.
« Reply #29 on: May 30, 2014, 10:42:PM »
Post evidence.  The family's testimony was not as anyone on this site tries to pretend.  After repeated questioning th ebest police would get them to say is maybe she visited Scotland though didn't shoot.

No workers on the farm or any of the extended family saw her shoot on the farm nor did Jeremy according to his own statement.

You are making it up that for sure she shot on the farm.

You always make claims without care ot their turht or even thinking before you post.





I don't make ANYTHING up.  Unlike yourself who's full of hot air and loves the sound of your own voice because it's echoed on the forum where you came from how good you are. Why do you follow yourself around ??

Don't forget to give yourself a pat on the back while you're at it !