Disturbing Evidence, which confirms that cops handed back silencer to the family

[lookout]

Was there a surplus of this notepaper,or what ?

[Jane]

Interseting Caroline, AFOREMENTIONED, normally the word ABOVE MENTIONED is used instead, yet Stan in his Composite statement uses it twice?  Like I say not used very often, you can even put the word in the search bar on the Jeremy Bamber forum and it will show you its hardly used, Well almost hardly used 

Bit like "COVERTLY", then.

[mike tesko]

This one ........ it's not genuine and the use of the word 'aforementioned' is interesting.

The use of all the words in this composite witness statement are very interesting to me, for example, 'On Wednesday 7th August 1985' that 'I attended the scene of a multiple shooting incident at white house farm', and that, 'I took possession of a sound moderator'..

Further, that 'On Friday 9th August 1985', that, 'I covertly returned the sound moderator to the farmhouse'..

And also still further, 'On Monday 12th August 1985', and 'I received possession of a sound moderator from Peter Eaton'...

These are all truthful facts supported by other police records and documentation...

[mike tesko]

Maybe I should start pulling words out of every composite witness statement in the police files, and start trying to raise merry hell!

Anybody can be pedantic if they are intelligent enough to be able to read anything!

[mike tesko]

The Composite witness statement made in Stan Jones name, dated 8th September 1985 is genuine, its part of the police file in my possession, as is the police message log recorded on the reverse of another police log which ought not to be recorded there because the logs were created in different buildings at Chelmsford police station - a document containing both logs provided directly to Jeremy Bamber himself by Essex police, so there is no reason whatsoever to think that somebody copied this composite version of Jones witness statement on the reverse of another composite version of a different statement!

[Caroline]

The said document has got the same code in the bottom left hand corner as that which Vanezis wrote on.
 4176,then a ref.

So someone took out the original contents of maybe that statement and replace the wording - I did the same as an example a few pages back. It's easy to do.

[Caroline]

Maybe I should start pulling words out of every composite witness statement in the police files, and start trying to raise merry hell!

Anybody can be pedantic if they are intelligent enough to be able to read anything!

Aforementioned is particulary interesting. The statement isn't genuine Mike and I think most would agree?

[Caroline]

The Composite witness statement made in Stan Jones name, dated 8th September 1985 is genuine, its part of the police file in my possession, as is the police message log recorded on the reverse of another police log which ought not to be recorded there because the logs were created in different buildings at Chelmsford police station - a document containing both logs provided directly to Jeremy Bamber himself by Essex police, so there is no reason whatsoever to think that somebody copied this composite version of Jones witness statement on the reverse of another composite version of a different statement!

If you 'believe' it's genuine, that's fine - however, it's not.

[Jane]

The use of all the words in this composite witness statement are very interesting to me, for example, 'On Wednesday 7th August 1985' that 'I attended the scene of a multiple shooting incident at white house farm', and that, 'I took possession of a sound moderator'..

Further, that 'On Friday 9th August 1985', that, 'I covertly returned the sound moderator to the farmhouse'..

And also still further, 'On Monday 12th August 1985', and 'I received possession of a sound moderator from Peter Eaton'...

These are all truthful facts supported by other police records and documentation...

Individually, that maybe so. However, when taken out of original context, their original meaning can become lost and may re-emerge as something entirely other.

[mike tesko]

Here is another composite witness statement, made in the name of david Boutflour, dated, 12th September 1985:-

Here we go...

Funny thing that, David Boutflour referring to a sound moderator only 4 days after mention of a sound moderator in the composite witness statement of Stan Jones!

He mentions a sound moderator twice, in fact...

Oh, and this is very interesting - he later contacted the police about the find of the sound moderator...

Well, funnily enough, he only spoke to the police once on the telephone about the find of the sound moderator, and that was on the 12th September 1985, same date somebody had created his composite witness statement!

How strange, that his sister, Ann Eaton had handed the second silencer over to DC Oakey on the previous day (11th September 1985), now, first of all, why would David Boutflour be contacting Essex police on the day following the hand over of the second sound moderator by his sister, if his brother in law (Peter Eaton) had already handed it over a month earlier and wait for it, that sound moderator that Ann Eatons husband had handed over to Stan Jones on 12th August 1985, was to all intents and purposes at Huntingdon Lab' where according to Essex police and Lab' records it had been ever since the 30th August 1985?

[mike tesko]

This composite witness statement made in David Boutflours name is a fake, why would he be contacting police on the 12th September 1985 to tell them he had found a sound moderator to the gun, when cops already knew he supposedly found the first sound moderator a month earlier - worse still, why did some cop or other create a composite witness statement in David Boutflours name stating that he notified police of the find of the same?

[mike tesko]

This composite witness statement made in David Boutflours name is a fake, why would he be contacting police on the 12th September 1985 to tell them he had found a sound moderator to the gun, when cops already knew he supposedly found the first sound moderator a month earlier - worse still, why did some cop or other create a composite witness statement in David Boutflours name stating that he notified police of the find of the same?

Hey, I feel like I'm about to go on a role, I think I'll start pulling every composite witness statement to pieces and declaring that every single one of them is a fake!!

Lets go the full hog on this if that's what you lot want...

I got all the fake composite statements containing all the garbage fake evidence used to help convict Jeremy Bamber! At this rate there will be no evidence to convict anyone of any killings! These fake composite witness statements that when it chooses to rely on them, the system works for the corrupt people and organisations in society and doesn't work for the innocents amongst us...

[mike tesko]

Hey, I feel like I'm about to go on a role, I think I'll start pulling every composite witness statement to pieces and declaring that every single one of them is a fake!!

Lets go the full hog on this if that's what you lot want...

I got all the fake composite statements containing all the garbage fake evidence used to help convict Jeremy Bamber! At this rate there will be no evidence to convict anyone of any killings! These fake composite witness statements that when it chooses to rely on them, the system works for the corrupt people and organisations in society and doesn't work for the innocents amongst us...

Hey, I got hundreds and hundreds of these fake composite versions of prosecution witness statements in my possession. It's going to take me ages to post every single one of them up on the forum and start pulling each and every one to pieces, but please be patient until I have completed that process! I do not take kindly to people accusing me of tampering with the copy of a witness statement, why would I need to do that when Iv'e got hundreds and hundreds of fake composite witness statements here with me, full of words, and phrases that the named witnesses did not say or even know had been put into a composite statement made by some corrupt cop of force solicitor of some dodgy bastard from the CPS?

[mike tesko]

http://jeremybamberforum.co.uk/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=9010.0;attach=50307

Ha Ha, Stan saying I Covertly, meaning, (secretly, disguised, concealed, under cover ) returned the Aforemost Sound Moderator to the Farmhouse and then making a statement to the fact 

How did Ann Eaton propose to still be in possession of the sound moderator until the 11th September 1985? Your starting to look guilty yourself of making things up, like a relative craving for the wealth of the deceased family, even to the point that they allowed their names to be added to a fake collection of composite witness statements including words and phrases that none of them have ever uttered...

[mike tesko]

Your starting to look guilty now yourself 

How so?

Guilty of what?