Author Topic: CT's 'Verbatim Project'.  (Read 10903 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Jane

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 33773
Re: CT's 'Verbatim Project'.
« Reply #90 on: December 03, 2017, 04:13:PM »






That was 2 hours ago.

Good God! Did it last THAT long?

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48670
Re: CT's 'Verbatim Project'.
« Reply #91 on: December 03, 2017, 04:19:PM »
Oh dear! Lookout, you appear to be saying that none of us have any right to change our minds. I realize it can be a bit scary for others. It can make some people feel rather insecure and unsupported -not you, of course ;) because the whole dynamic changes. Maybe my "harridan" emerged because those who'd previously been friendly towards me allowed me to see the other side of their personalities, so I felt a need to defend my new position?

 "Hate" isn't a word that's in my vocabulary when referring to people, Lookout.






You should be so lucky.I've had to defend my position from day one,so not having had the chance for others to see that there's actually another side to me other than my continued defensive attitude. It's been like fighting my way through treacle.

Hate isn't in mine either,but I know someone to whom it was used against me. Very school-yardish !!

Offline Jane

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 33773
Re: CT's 'Verbatim Project'.
« Reply #92 on: December 03, 2017, 04:24:PM »





You should be so lucky.I've had to defend my position from day one,so not having had the chance for others to see that there's actually another side to me other than my continued defensive attitude. It's been like fighting my way through treacle.

Hate isn't in mine either,but I know someone to whom it was used against me. Very school-yardish !!

WHY? You were one of a large number of supporters at one time so what/who did you need to defend yourself against?

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48670
Re: CT's 'Verbatim Project'.
« Reply #93 on: December 03, 2017, 04:30:PM »
WHY? You were one of a large number of supporters at one time so what/who did you need to defend yourself against?






That would be telling.

Offline Jane

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 33773
Re: CT's 'Verbatim Project'.
« Reply #94 on: December 03, 2017, 04:40:PM »





That would be telling.


Yes, it would, but it might also help to explain why you seem to feel the need to be so hostile with someone who hasn't been part of such behaviour?

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48670
Re: CT's 'Verbatim Project'.
« Reply #95 on: December 03, 2017, 04:43:PM »

Yes, it would, but it might also help to explain why you seem to feel the need to be so hostile with someone who hasn't been part of such behaviour?






To be on my guard,just in case because of me having that element of doubt all the time. Prepared for the unexpected is my motto.

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48670
Re: CT's 'Verbatim Project'.
« Reply #96 on: December 03, 2017, 04:44:PM »
I was in the Brownies as a child. :))

Offline Jane

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 33773
Re: CT's 'Verbatim Project'.
« Reply #97 on: December 03, 2017, 04:53:PM »
I was in the Brownies as a child. :))


Yeah, but that's more about making certain you've got clean knickers on in case you have an accident, isn't it? -I was in the Guides but I was threatened with demotion because I couldn't remember the pledge!!!- I certainly have no recall of them telling us to be on our guard because certain people couldn't be trusted. Like others, I've discovered that it's a fact of life, but I'm damned if I'm going to let them spoil my pleasure in the many, MANY of my knowledge who CAN be trusted. Perhaps it's down to good luck, but I've met only a small handful who've proved to be less than trustworthy.

guest7363

  • Guest
Re: CT's 'Verbatim Project'.
« Reply #98 on: December 03, 2017, 04:54:PM »

Yeah, but that's more about making certain you've got clean knickers on in case you have an accident, isn't it? -I was in the Guides but I was threatened with demotion because I couldn't remember the pledge!!!- I certainly have no recall of them telling us to be on our guard because certain people couldn't be trusted. Like others, I've discovered that it's a fact of life, but I'm damned if I'm going to let them spoil my pleasure in the many, MANY of my knowledge who CAN be trusted. Perhaps it's down to good luck, but I've met only a small handful who've proved to be less than trustworthy.
;D ;D ;D

Offline Caroline

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 27076
Re: CT's 'Verbatim Project'.
« Reply #99 on: December 03, 2017, 04:59:PM »






Well if you can't see how you're two-faced I'd better explain. When you first entered the forum with your " innocent " hat on,you were the nicest of people,then when you turned to guilty you became this harridan of hatred towards your fellow supporters.

Diversions ? Wasn't it you who mentioned " poppies " which weren't in this particular thread ?

It was me who mentioned poppies Lookout - and just because I can ...... I'll say it again - POPPIES!  ;D
Few people have the imagination for reality

Offline Caroline

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 27076
Re: CT's 'Verbatim Project'.
« Reply #100 on: December 03, 2017, 05:02:PM »





You should be so lucky.I've had to defend my position from day one,so not having had the chance for others to see that there's actually another side to me other than my continued defensive attitude. It's been like fighting my way through treacle.

Hate isn't in mine either,but I know someone to whom it was used against me. Very school-yardish !!

You have had to defend your position? ........ hang on a sec ........... Nope, thought not! For one moment that thought this must be the 'Lookout' forum. The forum is about Jeremy Bamber. if you have had to defend yourself, it's probably because you keep injecting yourself into the debate.
Few people have the imagination for reality

Offline JackieD

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3879
Re: CT's 'Verbatim Project'.
« Reply #101 on: December 03, 2017, 05:07:PM »
And there lies your domestic situation-------normal people don't carry on like that !!


Of course they don't lookout
Julie Mugford the main prosecution witness was guilty of numerous crimes, 13 separate cheque frauds, robbery, and drug dealing and also making a deal with a national newspaper before trial that if she could convince a jury her ex boyfriend was guilty of five murders she would receive £25,000

Offline JackieD

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3879
Re: CT's 'Verbatim Project'.
« Reply #102 on: December 03, 2017, 05:12:PM »
Oh, so you're not the incompetent twit you claim to be when it comes to computer skills? I thought it was strange that you -who claim such disgust and disinterest in red and those who reside there- knew your way round it better than I. I can only conclude that you frequently take sneaky looks at what they're saying to peddle over here as being your own thoughts. You're right, though. I don't go "looking for news items like that", "THAT" being those you seem to search for to post here.

I often look at the red forum, keeping a check to see if I can get the members on their prosecuted for racist and derogatory comments
Julie Mugford the main prosecution witness was guilty of numerous crimes, 13 separate cheque frauds, robbery, and drug dealing and also making a deal with a national newspaper before trial that if she could convince a jury her ex boyfriend was guilty of five murders she would receive £25,000

Offline JackieD

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3879
Re: CT's 'Verbatim Project'.
« Reply #103 on: December 03, 2017, 05:14:PM »






Is it an art being two-faced ? Or were you born that way ? This is another archaelogical dig by the way.

Lookout she has obviously got big problems in the way she posts
Julie Mugford the main prosecution witness was guilty of numerous crimes, 13 separate cheque frauds, robbery, and drug dealing and also making a deal with a national newspaper before trial that if she could convince a jury her ex boyfriend was guilty of five murders she would receive £25,000

Offline JackieD

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3879
Re: CT's 'Verbatim Project'.
« Reply #104 on: December 03, 2017, 05:16:PM »
WHY? You were one of a large number of supporters at one time so what/who did you need to defend yourself against?


There's only one or two people on this forum who think Jeremy is guilty and everyone else is connected in some way to the family
Julie Mugford the main prosecution witness was guilty of numerous crimes, 13 separate cheque frauds, robbery, and drug dealing and also making a deal with a national newspaper before trial that if she could convince a jury her ex boyfriend was guilty of five murders she would receive £25,000