Conspirational Framework - Jeremy's Conviction

[Adam]

You did , it has been mentioned on here several times you must have forgotten .

I must have not read that post.

How could I forget one of the ambulance men believing Bamber is innocent ?

[Steve_uk]

It breaks my heart how trusting Colin, Sheila, Nicholas and Daniel as individuals were, all of a mindset of gentler times, none of whom could ever envisage what lay in store for them as the 1980s progressed and the social fabric of the nation gently deteriorated alongside mother's health.

[lookout]

It was the beginning of the end of those times Steve,forever.

[Jan]

I must have not read that post.

How could I forget one of the ambulance men believing Bamber is innocent ?

Because you would have dismissed it anyway.

[susan]

Because you would have dismissed it anyway.

Jan think the term is "selective memory"

[Adam]

Jan think the term is "selective memory"

You say things. Then deny saying them. Asking me to find you're own posts because you have not got the capacity to. 

[Adam]

Because you would have dismissed it anyway.

How can I dismiss one of the ambulance men (apparently) thinking Bamber is innocent ?

[guest7363]

Jan think the term is "selective memory"

Yes, if the cap fits.

[Adam]

RB went to Peter Simpson in September. Ainsley & Kinnely came into the case after this & Taff was taken off heading the case. The submission to the DPP was also in September.

There is no possibility enough false evidence for the DPP could have been created in only a few days.

There is also no reason why the police would rush things & risk a rejection, which may leak out to the media. The police had no deadlines.

[Adam]

A way around this impossibility is that the DPP were also corrupt in this case. Letting the case through when there was insufficient evidence.

The police may have told the DPP they wanted to frame Bamber & the DPP agreed Bamber should be framed.

As Roch said, after the DPP approval, EP & the external bodies then had a year to create over 200 pieces of watertight false evidence.

[maggie]

You say things. Then deny saying them. Asking me to find you're own posts because you have not got the capacity to.

Hello Adam, think you make a mistake to underrate Susan. She is not short of 'capacity'.

[Jan]

Hello Adam, think you make a mistake to underrate Susan. She is not short of 'capacity'.

Yes that is quite rude .

[Adam]

Hello Adam, think you make a mistake to underrate Susan. She is not short of 'capacity'.

And I don't have a selective memory.

[guest7363]

And I don't have a selective memory.

Quite right Adam, I thought that was a bit harsh.

[Adam]

The police were taking a big risk in asking the DPP to be corrupt. A rejection & report by the DPP would be a disaster for EP & individual police officers.

As mentioned the police were under no time restrictions.  Now that Simpson had got his team of corrupt officers together, they could have spent the next few months creating sufficient false evidence for the DPP without asking them to also be corrupt.