It wasn't a television series where the script make it all come right. Jeremy had the best part of a month to get rid of everything which might have incriminated him. He'd got it right enough that they didn't immediately suspect him which gave him breathing space.
And here is the crux of the matter. In these cases it appears so as an axiom, here is a real case, Shaun Attwood and drug dealing from his book Hard Time.
“Detective Reid even admits that you never talk on the phone, in emails, or have people at your home. That you’re beyond surveillance. They’re using the gist of the conversations of the co-defendants as the main evidence against you.
The prosecutor’s trying to say the lack of evidence against you proves you’re a criminal mastermind, too clever to be detected.
So the lack of evidence against you is actually evidence against you, which is ridiculous!”
Here is a passage from the Lundy book.
August 29th, 2000, right up to just before he left on his alleged murderous rampage –
“He appeared to be his normal self”.
“He was his normal bubbly self”.
“He seemed as good as gold”
“He was the same as usual – happy, chatty, just normal Mark. He is one of our favourite reps”
“Every time the accused came in here he was always cheery, bubbly and happy. I never saw him in a bad mood. He was always the same, happy and chatty”.
“He always had a big smile and was always talkative. His visit on the day was no different from usual. I would describe him as a big teddy bear. He was a genuine, gentle, nice guy”.
“He appeared to be happy as usual”
“The accused was exactly like he usually is. He has a casual, easygoing manner about him”.
Now, by later that evening of course, Mark had allegedly hacked Christine to death and he had had a major hiccup in his “meticulous” plan – he had unfortunately had to chop to death his “adored”, “loved” and “worshipped” daughter Amber. The “apple of his eye”. Soul destroying stuff. Shattering. Plus, the frantic drives “in extremis that nobody could replicate” (and worried stiff that people must have seen him – what an idiot!), and the frantic hiding of all the incriminating evidence. What a night! Mark would be a right mess. Correct? He is visited by a prostitute at about midnight. He discusses his business, and talks about what role Christine plays in it.
The woman’s statement states “There was nothing unusual in his behaviour”. “To deal with, I found him to be very nice and pleasant to be around even though he stank of alcohol”. “He was very nice the whole time I was there”. “I wouldn’t have anything bad to say about him”.
So, to the next morning when Lundy had to visit more customers.
Firstly, the motel manager said that Mark “appeared well” when he checked out at 8:09am. The following are comments, which the police had, from customers Mark visited on the morning of August 30th, the morning after the murders –
“The accused is a very friendly, caring person. He is very gentle and very nice. He always mentioned Christine and Amber and spoke of them fondly”.
“I asked him how his wife and kids were …….his usual self…..always cheerful and good to deal with”.
“I found him to be really chatty. He was very happy and smiley like he usually is. His demeanour was the same as it always was”.
“The accused appeared to be his normal self. He was well dressed as usual and friendly. There didn’t appear to be anything wrong”.
- and from the notebook of Sweeney (not disclosed) who visited and spoke to the two customers in Wellington city (when Lundy was alleged to be in the Hutt) “Absolutely nothing strange about Lundy. Sweet/Normal”
.................................
So you see why he almost got away with it too, and it took 6 months to arrest him?
Like Jeremy Bamber he was not there.