Author Topic: 2002 Appeal: Determining the time of Bamber's second call to Julie:  (Read 14032 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48670
Re: 2002 Appeal: Determining the time of Bamber's second call to Julie:
« Reply #120 on: January 06, 2017, 12:55:PM »
He called her to 'hear a friendly voice'.

Although it seems accepted by both Bamber and Julie that all Julie said was "hello" and "go back to bed".





Another hanging offence ? Wanting to hear a friendly voice ? Oh dear,it gets worse.

All these lame excuses coming out since the latest facts were laid bare on " Liars Lobby " !! Pathetic.

Offline lebaleb

  • Senior Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 884
Re: 2002 Appeal: Determining the time of Bamber's second call to Julie:
« Reply #121 on: January 06, 2017, 12:57:PM »
He called her to 'hear a friendly voice'.

Although it seems accepted by both Bamber and Julie that all Julie said was "hello" and "go back to bed".

Mugford said in a sworn statement that Jeremy 'didn't know what to do'.

Offline Stephanie

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7614
  • The facts leading to the Simon Hall confession
Re: 2002 Appeal: Determining the time of Bamber's second call to Julie:
« Reply #122 on: January 06, 2017, 01:01:PM »




Another hanging offence ? Wanting to hear a friendly voice ? Oh dear,it gets worse.

All these lame excuses coming out since the latest facts were laid bare on " Liars Lobby " !! Pathetic.

Not a hanging offence Lookout. Just a blatant lie that you don't appear to be able to see because of those rose tinted spectacle you are wearing.

You are xxxxxzz if you really believe that.
« Last Edit: January 06, 2017, 10:03:PM by maggie »
“The only people who are mad at you for telling the truth are those people who are living a lie. Keep telling the truth"

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48670
Re: 2002 Appeal: Determining the time of Bamber's second call to Julie:
« Reply #123 on: January 06, 2017, 01:13:PM »
We know





That's alright as long as you know.

Offline JackiePreece

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4743
Re: 2002 Appeal: Determining the time of Bamber's second call to Julie:
« Reply #124 on: January 06, 2017, 01:32:PM »
Good point Lookout, that could have been a motive for Bamber to murder his parents, imagine being forced out the comfort of the armchair by your despairing parents.

Xxxxxxxx reply
« Last Edit: January 06, 2017, 10:03:PM by maggie »
"No hour of life is wasted that is spent in the saddle" Winston Churchill

Offline Stephanie

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7614
  • The facts leading to the Simon Hall confession
Re: 2002 Appeal: Determining the time of Bamber's second call to Julie:
« Reply #125 on: January 06, 2017, 01:35:PM »
Pathetic reply

What do you perceive as pathetic about it? Taking into consideration everything else we know about Bamber.
« Last Edit: January 06, 2017, 01:36:PM by Stephanie »
“The only people who are mad at you for telling the truth are those people who are living a lie. Keep telling the truth"

guest7363

  • Guest
Re: 2002 Appeal: Determining the time of Bamber's second call to Julie:
« Reply #126 on: January 06, 2017, 01:39:PM »
What do you perceive as pathetic about it? Taking into consideration everything else we know about Bamber.
Im ok Steph, I don't take things personal, l am here to debate,

Offline Caroline

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 27076
Re: 2002 Appeal: Determining the time of Bamber's second call to Julie:
« Reply #127 on: January 06, 2017, 01:43:PM »




Another hanging offence ? Wanting to hear a friendly voice ? Oh dear,it gets worse.

All these lame excuses coming out since the latest facts were laid bare on " Liars Lobby " !! Pathetic.

The Liars Lobby is an utter joke!
Few people have the imagination for reality

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48670
Re: 2002 Appeal: Determining the time of Bamber's second call to Julie:
« Reply #128 on: January 06, 2017, 04:17:PM »
Im ok Steph, I don't take things personal, l am here to debate,




Your reason is simple. It's because EVERYONE agrees with you !! Try battling against those who don't !

Offline JackiePreece

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4743
Re: 2002 Appeal: Determining the time of Bamber's second call to Julie:
« Reply #129 on: January 06, 2017, 04:28:PM »



I haven't come to accept anything else but xxxxx posts,Jackie.Though others don't see them that way ???


I think it's people with too much time on their hands who just like an argument. Anyone who looks into this case can see cover ups, dubious witness statements etc

There has not been one piece of evidence on this forum that shows Jeremy was greedy enough or violent enough to carry out these murders


Everything points to Sheila who was in the most dreadful state at the time
« Last Edit: January 06, 2017, 08:27:PM by maggie »
"No hour of life is wasted that is spent in the saddle" Winston Churchill

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48670
Re: 2002 Appeal: Determining the time of Bamber's second call to Julie:
« Reply #130 on: January 06, 2017, 04:43:PM »

I think it's people with too much time on their hands who just like an argument. Anyone who looks into this case can see cover ups, dubious witness statements etc

There has not been one piece of evidence on this forum that shows Jeremy was greedy enough or violent enough to carry out these murders


Everything points to Sheila who was in the most dreadful state at the time




 

With Sheila's track record,it couldn't be anyone else

Offline Caroline

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 27076
Re: 2002 Appeal: Determining the time of Bamber's second call to Julie:
« Reply #131 on: January 06, 2017, 05:25:PM »
Again Jackie your post proves you lack the ability to be rational.

That's why she attacks the poster and not the post.
Few people have the imagination for reality

Offline JackiePreece

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4743
Re: 2002 Appeal: Determining the time of Bamber's second call to Julie:
« Reply #132 on: January 06, 2017, 05:36:PM »
Again Jackie your post proves you lack the ability to be rational.

I am absolutely rational, I think you need to study other forum members posts and digest

You are not someone I want to engage with especially whe you try to make out you understand what goes on in people's minds

You are no expert on anything and certainly not Jeremy Bamber
You are now permanently in ignore with the other Paul Harrison Disciples
"No hour of life is wasted that is spent in the saddle" Winston Churchill

Offline Caroline

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 27076
Re: 2002 Appeal: Determining the time of Bamber's second call to Julie:
« Reply #133 on: January 06, 2017, 06:06:PM »
I am absolutely rational, I think you need to study other forum members posts and digest

You are not someone I want to engage with especially whe you try to make out you understand what goes on in people's minds

You are no expert on anything and certainly not Jeremy Bamber
You are now permanently in ignore with the other Paul Harrison Disciples

There are only a few people here who can be described as 'disciples' but NONE of them worship Paul Harrison.
Few people have the imagination for reality

Offline Reader

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2456
Re: 2002 Appeal: Determining the time of Bamber's second call to Julie:
« Reply #134 on: January 07, 2017, 01:53:AM »
Mugford said in a sworn statement that Jeremy 'didn't know what to do'.
What statement?