The most obvious pieces of information or evidence which guarantees his total innocence, is the fact that:-
(a) Cops, experts, and relatives had to frame him, because they 'thought' he might have had something to do with it, so they improvised the evidence, acting with a touch of 'noble cause corruption' in mind'...
(b) no evidence presented to prove that anyone had been shot prior to J making his 3.36am call to cops...
1 - Occupants of CA07 were deployed to scene prior to J making his call, evidence which confirms that cops received other intelligence and information regarding what was transpiring at the farmhouse from a different source...
(c) no evidence to place J at the scene at the time any of the victims got shot or were killed...
(d) no evidence to show that he loaded any of the 15 additional bullets required to carry out the murders into the gun which cops have identified as the murder weapon...
(e) closest cops could put J to the scene at any stage of their investigation was when the occupants of CA07 overtook him on their way to the farmhouse. At this time J was driving his astra car at 30 MPH when cops overtook his car. J was travelling toward the farmhouse, not from it. The occupants (CA07) were not deployed to the incident as a result of J's call to cops at 3.36am, they were deployed to the scene before J called cops. Occupants of CA05 were deployed to the scene as a result of J's 3.36am call, and they did not arrive there until 4.22am (30 minutes after J arrived there. So, if anything got from his cottage at Head Street, Goldhanger, to the farmhouse, faster than the occupants of CA05 did. But at trial prosecution presented the argument that J had been taking his time to get to the farm because the cops overtook him. Wrongs cops overtook J, just shows how devious and sly prosecution of J was...
(f) Pathologist, police doctor, Coroners officer, Senior cops, firearm officers, SOCO's, ambulance paramedics, who all attended the scene, could not confirm that any of the victims had died any sooner, or earlier than the occupants of CA07 arrived at the scene at 3.48am, that morning...
(g) cops had to do an 'officers report' about the shooting incident which took place upon first entry into the kitchen of the farmhouse. A victim was presumed 'dead' as a result of the discharge of a raid team members firearm. The person that got shot was alive before the cop shot them, the person who got shot was Sheila Caffell, therefore J could not have shot and killed her, either downstairs in the kitchen (in accordance with the specifics of the aforementioned officers report), or upstairs in the main bedroom, either whilst she was on the bed, or later when cops moved her body to the floor...
(h) J passed a lie detector test, answering 'No' to key questions relating to his potential culpability. He did not shoot his dad. He did not shoot his mum. He did not shoot his sister. He did not shoot her two young children. He was not at the farmhouse when any of them or all of them had been shot...
(I) J had no injuries consistent with him being involved in a supposed 'struggle' in a matter of life or death, with his dad, before dad succumbed to his fate...
(j) PC Mercers police dog failed to detect a presence of firearm discharge residue upon J or his clothing whilst J was with other cops in the grounds of the farmhouse, confirming that J had not fired a firearm recently, nor had J been any closer to the farmhouse itself other than where he was stood when PC Mercers dog was brought to 'check him out'...
(k) no firearm discharge residue or lead deposits was found to be present upon J's hands or clothing, nor upon the handle bar and grips of the pushbike it was alleged J had used to make good his escape after allegedly killing everyone...
(l) dads call to cops at 3.26am...
(m) activation of Special Branch attack alarm from farmhouse at 3.29am...
(n) DS 'Stan' Jones was at the heart of everything corrupt regarding the evidence used to help convict J as the killer. He had to obtain another pocketbook and rewrite all his notes because the original contents which he originally recorded in his pocketbook would have guaranteed an acquittal had Rivlin QC ever got his hands upon it and seen its original contents...
(o) person seen at bedroom window by Bews, Myall and J, obviously at least one of the victims was still alive inside the farmhouse by that stage (around 4am)...
(p) phone suddenly became engaged when operator was checking line for cops, obviously somebody still alive using the phone inside the farmhouse, whilst cops and J were outside in the grounds or at Pages Lane, near farm cottages. Closest victim to kitchen phone when bodies of victims ended up by 10 am was dad. But the person cops shot upon entry to the kitchen may have been the person who was using the phone at the specified time, thus helping to establish that Sheila was responsible for the death of dad, mum and her kids. Sheila was the person shot by cops in the kitchen. There exists an 'officers report' confirming this which nobody should ignore. The phone suddenly became 'engaged' when the operator was checking the line for cops without so much as an explanation as to how the line had become engaged whilst the operator had control of the line?
