I can only conclude David didn't meet Bamber's lawyers.
I don't see why the lawyers would need to meet him when they already had his 'forensic evidence breakthrough' & can discuss it with Bamber or other experts. Or they can ignore the 'forensic evidence breakthough', which was just a palm print on the bible.
David said he met the lawyers in reply 482 of the 'Letter Trail' thread, but didn't answer my question in reply 489. Or today.