Author Topic: New Technology  (Read 31297 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

guest2181

  • Guest
Re: New Technology
« Reply #195 on: January 10, 2016, 03:49:PM »
The website I got the photo from said it was .22 rifle. Besides who shoots themselves under the chin with a handgun? You would aim to the side of the head above the ear. I am sure someone in the past has used a handgun to shoot themselves in the neck but it would be a very odd decision to make

Shooting yourself with a rifle or a hand gun seems like an odd decision to me.  :-\

Offline David1819

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 13779
Re: New Technology
« Reply #196 on: January 10, 2016, 03:57:PM »
Shooting yourself with a rifle or a hand gun seems like an odd decision to me.  :-\

Sadly many people do it  :(

However if I elaborate what I was trying to get across, If someone had a handgun and was going to shoot themselves. Deciding to shoot under the chin and not to the side of head would be an odd decision.

guest2181

  • Guest
Re: New Technology
« Reply #197 on: January 10, 2016, 04:05:PM »
Sadly many people do it  :(

However if I elaborate what I was trying to get across, If someone had a handgun and was going to shoot themselves. Deciding to shoot under the chin and not to the side of head would be an odd decision.

I understood your meaning.  :)

Offline Caroline

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 27076
Re: New Technology
« Reply #198 on: January 10, 2016, 04:40:PM »
The website I got the photo from said it was .22 rifle. Besides who shoots themselves under the chin with a handgun? You would aim to the side of the head above the ear. I am sure someone in the past has used a handgun to shoot themselves in the neck but it would be a very odd decision to make

Which website? Also, I don't think any one of us can determine where someone would shoot themselves, I think it's very much down to personal preference - so to speak.
Few people have the imagination for reality

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48676
Re: New Technology
« Reply #199 on: January 10, 2016, 06:13:PM »
How did it take 4 shots ?

Offline Jane

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 33773
Re: New Technology
« Reply #200 on: January 10, 2016, 06:46:PM »
How did it take 4 shots ?


You know I never take anything at face value so I feel certain that there's far more to this story than simply listing it as a statistic implies.

Offline Caroline

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 27076
Re: New Technology
« Reply #201 on: January 10, 2016, 07:39:PM »

You know I never take anything at face value so I feel certain that there's far more to this story than simply listing it as a statistic implies.

When David posts the link, we may find out more.
Few people have the imagination for reality

Offline David1819

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 13779
Re: New Technology
« Reply #202 on: January 10, 2016, 11:42:PM »
When David posts the link, we may find out more.

You did post the link (documenting reality) I don't recommend people visit it BTW

But the description you posted is from this book

http://link.springer.com/referenceworkentry/10.1007/978-1-61779-058-4_13

Offline Caroline

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 27076
Re: New Technology
« Reply #203 on: January 11, 2016, 12:29:AM »
You did post the link (documenting reality) I don't recommend people visit it BTW

But the description you posted is from this book

http://link.springer.com/referenceworkentry/10.1007/978-1-61779-058-4_13


No the description was from the website, it was the description that went with the picture - and it doesn't mention a .22 rifle. You said the following

The website I got the photo from said it was .22 rifle. Besides who shoots themselves under the chin with a handgun? You would aim to the side of the head above the ear. I am sure someone in the past has used a handgun to shoot themselves in the neck but it would be a very odd decision to make

This is a screen shot from the website, no mention of a .22 rifle.  ;D

Few people have the imagination for reality

Offline David1819

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 13779
Re: New Technology
« Reply #204 on: January 11, 2016, 01:24:AM »
No the description was from the website, it was the description that went with the picture - and it doesn't mention a .22 rifle. You said the following

This is a screen shot from the website, no mention of a .22 rifle.  ;D

I bet you it was a rifle because if it was a handgun he would aim to the side of the head  ;D

Besides rifle or not it proves it can be done  8)

Offline Caroline

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 27076
Re: New Technology
« Reply #205 on: January 11, 2016, 01:53:AM »
I bet you it was a rifle because if it was a handgun he would aim to the side of the head  ;D

Besides rifle or not it proves it can be done  8)

Well, we'll never know, all we know is it was a 'low calibre weapon' and I don't think it was denied that it was possible. However, in your example only one shot would have been fatal, both shots would have killed Sheila - the first just wasn't immediately fatal.
Few people have the imagination for reality

Online ngb1066

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6671
Re: New Technology
« Reply #206 on: January 11, 2016, 10:13:AM »

One of the variables I asked about, Caroline. A small calibre obviously being easier to manipulate than a  .22 rifle. Did he have a broken neck? He was clearly adept with a gun because he knew where to hit for greatest effect WITHOUT killing himself, before the final shot.

A .22 rifle is considered small calibre Jane.

Online ngb1066

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6671
Re: New Technology
« Reply #207 on: January 11, 2016, 10:14:AM »
There are lots of different types of .22 bullets. I don't know, but I'd guess that some vary in effectiveness.  :-\

I'd have said (another guess) that a rifle and hand gun would be as powerful as each other, but a rifle is more accurate at distance.

That is a fair summary.


Online ngb1066

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6671
Re: New Technology
« Reply #208 on: January 11, 2016, 10:16:AM »
If one HAS to pull the trigger for each and every shot, why, as a matter of safety, should it be that the slightest touch could result in the firing of another, and perhaps inappropriate, bullet?

It requires minimal finger pressure on the trigger to fire the weapon.  With the safety catch off it is easy to fire by accident.

Online ngb1066

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6671
Re: New Technology
« Reply #209 on: January 11, 2016, 10:17:AM »
Sadly many people do it  :(

However if I elaborate what I was trying to get across, If someone had a handgun and was going to shoot themselves. Deciding to shoot under the chin and not to the side of head would be an odd decision.

With a handgun the more common method is into the mouth, upwards.