Who has more rights thirty years on: Jeremy or Colin?

[Jane]

I think this was also mat's view, which I am coming round to. What she hasn't begun to think of is how the murders occurred were Jeremy to be innocent.

She would distance herself from it, Steve. I once recall speaking with a friend's cousin, a would be Mayor of London, until he was deselected!!!!! He was telling my how HE'D managed to prevent nuclear waste being transported though his "patch" by train. I asked where it WAS going. He simply said "Not my problem".

[lookout]

The CT have NOTHING to do with the legal team.

Who are the funds for then ?

[Steve_uk]

Who are the funds for then ?

Ostensibly for new forensic tests.

[lookout]

Ostensibly for new forensic tests.

Exactly-----between the CT and the legal team ( which Caroline has just said that CT have nothing to do with the legal team )

[guest154]

I think this was also mat's view, which I am coming round to. What she hasn't begun to think of is how the murders occurred were Jeremy to be innocent.

I agree Steve, not just Trudi though, many who believe Jeremy innocent don't seem to know how Sheila can be guilty.

[Caroline]

Who are the funds for then ?

Ask them

[guest154]

Who are the funds for then ?

They say to help spread the word.

[Caroline]

They say to help spread the word.

Hallelujah!!

[Alias]

Slight issue with this, June was also suddenly awoken yet found with a terrified look on her face. There is know way Shelia would "be at peach" while Jeremy was engineering her staged suicide.

Yes they are.

The pictures I have seen of June in her death, she is very beautiful.

[lookout]

The pictures I have seen of June in her death, she is very beautiful.

The conflict of two beautiful women----------so very sad.

[Caroline]

Slight issue with this, June was also suddenly awoken yet found with a terrified look on her face. There is know way Shelia would "be at peach" while Jeremy was engineering her staged suicide.

Yes they are.

Where is that documented? There are several pictures of June in the archives but none of them clear enough to show any details about her face.

[lookout]

Where is that documented? There are several pictures of June in the archives but none of them clear enough to show any details about her face.

Which is probably why. The same goes for Neville. Too horrendous for public display----immoral too might I add.

[Caroline]

Which is probably why. The same goes for Neville. Too horrendous for public display----immoral too might I add.

David made a statement and has nothing to back it up and 'probably' doesn't cut it.

[lookout]

David made a statement and has nothing to back it up and 'probably' doesn't cut it.

Somewhere on this forum many moons ago,a poster asked what the reason was that Neville had been blocked out as well and if there were any more photo's depicting the adults.
If I remember rightly,NGB had answered by saying that for obvious reasons,the photo's were never going to be shown to the public-----------which is fair enough.Who'd want to see them anyway ? Unless they were mercenary in some way.
These horrendous photo's do exist,but not for our eyes thank goodness. EP'll have them.

[Steve_uk]

Do we really want these photos out in the public domain, or would it be better for a panel to view them, made up,say of Michael Mansfield QC and Peter Tatchell, to name but two.