The Glasgow Herald newspaper cuttings.

[Jane]

Not before I've reported you !!

As have I, Lookout.

[Adam]

Not before I've reported you !!

What for ?

I have tried to help you.

I gave you the option of sending me a PM prior to the stance change you know you have to make. If you are not going to do this, then I have suggested you speak to April, Susan or Caroline.

I have told you that you must stop posting things you can't back up for attention and ignoring evidence. Although I praised you for acknowledging the forensic evidence I posted recently. But saying it is the 'the wrong kind of forensic evidence' is again seeking attention.

Anyway I have suggested a ban. If me or Scipio called someone this name we would get an instant ban.
 

[vidvic]

am confused as to what either of you have done wrong!

Adam, you can not insist Lookout listens to you and Lookout, you cannot call him an arsehole just for giving his view. And stop all this running to the mods! we're supposed tobe adults!

[Jane]

am confused as to what either of you have done wrong!

Adam, you can not insist Lookout listens to you and Lookout, you cannot call him an arsehole just for giving his view. And stop all this running to the mods! we're supposed tobe adults!

You're clearly not au fait with Adam's track record, Vic

[vidvic]

You're clearly not au fait with Adam's track record, Vic

Clearly.!

[Adam]

Well I gave 12 reasons why the police changed stance. After one month. In response to 'Notsure's' post. Post 141.

Lookout posted 'tosh' but refused to elaborate.

I asked her why she thought the police changed stance after one month.  She said she refuses to discuss it and called me a name that is worthy of a ban. Which I have suggested.

[vidvic]

Well I gave 12 reasons why the police changed stance. After one month. In response to 'Notsure's' post. Post 141.

Lookout posted 'tosh' but refused to elaborate.

I asked her why she thought the police changed stance after one month.  She said she refuses to discuss it and called me a name that is worthy of a ban. Which I have suggested.

You should take it as a compliment, means you're winning the argument. Move on.

[Caroline]

Clearly.!

Ever had a dripping tap or a broken toilet where the water keeps flowing? Annoying? NOT EVEN CLOSE!

[vidvic]

Ever had a dripping tap or a broken toilet where the water keeps flowing? Annoying? NOT EVEN CLOSE!

Lol... I'm starting to build a picture... lol

[vidvic]

We should each have a list of offensive words that we are allowed to use, say twice a month....Lookout has one arse left....lol... i will use all mine in one go at Tesko.

[Caroline]

We should each have a list of offensive words that we are allowed to use, say twice a month....Lookout has one arse left....lol... i will use all mine in one go at Tesko.

Sh*t (opps, only one of those left), I think I might have exhausted mine  . I can invent some new ones though!!

[Jane]

Sh*t (opps, only one of those left), I think I might have exhausted mine  . I can invent some new ones though!!

Shouldn't need to Caroline. There's a multiplicity of words you can turn sh-1-t into without it becoming illegal

[Caroline]

Shouldn't need to Caroline. There's a multiplicity of words you can turn sh-1-t into without it becoming illegal

I must learn to extend my vocabulary 

[Adam]

You should take it as a compliment, means you're winning the argument. Move on.

Why doesn't Lookout just say 'I agree with you're 12 reasons'

Or say that the relatives forced the police to frame Bamber.

[vidvic]

Why doesn't Lookout just say 'I agree with you're 12 reasons'

Or say that the relatives forced the police to frame Bamber.

Because she doesn't?.... move on with your life! I agreed with every one of your reasons...but telling people they're wrong isn't the way to convince people...