Author Topic: The Myths of Circumstantial Evidence  (Read 37511 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48676
Re: The Myths of Circumstantial Evidence
« Reply #105 on: May 30, 2015, 05:34:PM »
No you do it.

I suggest you start reading. There is a lot.






I asked YOU.    I CAN'T do it because there ISN'T any. ::) Maybe you're more observant. :o

Offline Adam

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 44398
Re: The Myths of Circumstantial Evidence
« Reply #106 on: May 30, 2015, 06:27:PM »
You have asked me several times and I always answer. Perhaps you forget. Or don't want to take it in.

Anyway my thread 'Was there really no forensic evidence' has been up for months.

There is also the evidence that Sheila did not do anything. But as Jan said. The police may have cleaned her up before the pathologist and crime scene investigators arrived.
'Only I know what really happened that night'.

Offline scipio_usmc

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 9502
Re: The Myths of Circumstantial Evidence
« Reply #107 on: May 30, 2015, 07:16:PM »
In his statement in Sept he denied he used the phrases the police were accusing him of. So his word against thier. I was just suggesting they could have embellished what he said to cover up why they did not go in straight away. Or as you said they may have forgotten as it was a month later. But it does mean if that was true he did not set the situation to stop them going in . In fact he begged them to go in and never indicated that any shots had been fired and perhaps did not say she had fired every weapon in the house - which is what I was getting at.

Too many police said it, even Mercer the dog handler.  It is hard to believe all the cops got together to lie.
Politeness is organized indifference- Paul Valéry

Offline Caroline

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 27076
Re: The Myths of Circumstantial Evidence
« Reply #108 on: May 30, 2015, 07:28:PM »
In his statement in Sept he denied he used the phrases the police were accusing him of. So his word against thier. I was just suggesting they could have embellished what he said to cover up why they did not go in straight away. Or as you said they may have forgotten as it was a month later. But it does mean if that was true he did not set the situation to stop them going in . In fact he begged them to go in and never indicated that any shots had been fired and perhaps did not say she had fired every weapon in the house - which is what I was getting at.

Well, he would. The police wouldn't have gone in their straight away anyway, not when there was the potential of meeting an armed suspect. Who said he begged them to go in? Was that Bews? I thought people didn't believe a word he said?
Few people have the imagination for reality

Offline Jan

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 10318
Re: The Myths of Circumstantial Evidence
« Reply #109 on: May 30, 2015, 07:38:PM »
You have asked me several times and I always answer. Perhaps you forget. Or don't want to take it in.

Anyway my thread 'Was there really no forensic evidence' has been up for months.

There is also the evidence that Sheila did not do anything. But as Jan said. The police may have cleaned her up before the pathologist and crime scene investigators arrived.

EXCUSE ME -  :o  show me where I said the police may have cleaned her up - or you are a liar

Offline Jan

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 10318
Re: The Myths of Circumstantial Evidence
« Reply #110 on: May 30, 2015, 07:41:PM »
Too many police said it, even Mercer the dog handler.  It is hard to believe all the cops got together to lie.

 :) :) :) :)

It has been known

Offline Jan

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 10318
Re: The Myths of Circumstantial Evidence
« Reply #111 on: May 30, 2015, 07:53:PM »
EXCUSE ME - >:(  :o  show me where I said the police may have cleaned her up - or you are a liar

STILL WAITING  >:(

Offline Caroline

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 27076
Re: The Myths of Circumstantial Evidence
« Reply #112 on: May 30, 2015, 07:57:PM »
:) :) :) :)

It has been known

For something big, not a domestic murder/suicide  ;)
Few people have the imagination for reality

Offline Jan

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 10318
Re: The Myths of Circumstantial Evidence
« Reply #113 on: May 30, 2015, 08:01:PM »
For something big, not a domestic murder/suicide  ;)

well as I don't know the details of every single MOJ in the country I cant comment.

perhaps this is the first ;) ;) ;)

Offline Caroline

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 27076
Re: The Myths of Circumstantial Evidence
« Reply #114 on: May 30, 2015, 08:41:PM »
well as I don't know the details of every single MOJ in the country I cant comment.

perhaps this is the first ;) ;) ;)

Sorry I got distracted - could have sworn I saw a flying pig  :o :o ;D ;)
Few people have the imagination for reality

Offline Jan

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 10318
Re: The Myths of Circumstantial Evidence
« Reply #115 on: May 30, 2015, 09:03:PM »
Sorry I got distracted - could have sworn I saw a flying pig  :o :o ;D ;)

No that was the last word flying past . The one you always have to have  :)

Offline Jan

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 10318
Re: The Myths of Circumstantial Evidence
« Reply #116 on: May 30, 2015, 09:06:PM »
EXCUSE ME -  :o  show me where I said the police may have cleaned her up - or you are a liar

Still waiting Adam >:(

Offline Caroline

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 27076
Re: The Myths of Circumstantial Evidence
« Reply #117 on: May 30, 2015, 09:11:PM »
No that was the last word flying past . The one you always have to have  :)

Not that anyone could accuse you of that - right?  ;D ;D ;D ;D ;) 8)
Few people have the imagination for reality

Offline Jan

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 10318
Re: The Myths of Circumstantial Evidence
« Reply #118 on: May 30, 2015, 09:13:PM »
I would answer - but that might be the last word - so I wont  ;)

Offline Caroline

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 27076
Re: The Myths of Circumstantial Evidence
« Reply #119 on: May 30, 2015, 09:14:PM »
I would answer - but that might be the last word - so I wont  ;)

Me either  :P
Few people have the imagination for reality