13 bullet cases in m/bedroom, yet no follower plate mark found on them...

[mike tesko]

Fletcher never claimed it was a whole bullet.  By definition they are all fragments because not a single bullet that was fully intact.  Fletcher notations in his notes that said whole bullet didn't mean that it was a full 40 grain bullet.  The notes were for his own purposes. At trial he never claimed full bullets were found.  It is another of your strawmen.

He did, in fact, he specifically recorded that 12 of the 25 bullets which formed part of the batch of crime scene ammunition were WHOLE in nature. Seven of these 12 WHOLE bullets weighed too much, and the other five of the 12 WHOLE bullets were much too light to be described as Eley .22LR subsonic hollow pointed bullets which according to manufacturers specification at production stage weigh 2.26g, or 34.8113Grains, so please do not even go down the road of trying to convince any of us that the prosecution expert Fletcher presented an honest account of the true bullet weights of the bullets recovered from the bodies of victims, and the scene. Fletcher was / is a rotten apple, who manipulated the ballistic expert favouring the police case that this was a one gun crime, with use of a sound moderator...

[mike tesko]

They weigh 40 grains when whole.  No recovered bullet was 40 grains or more they were all less.

I beg to differ:-

[mike tesko]

You have deliberately sought to deceive everyone into thinking and believing that rounds of manufactured Eley .22LR subsonic hollow point bullets weighed 40 GRAIN, but they do not and did not back in the era when the shootings took place. Your distortion of the true manufacturers bullet weight, produces a conversion weight (into grams) which is heavier than all the recovered individual pieces of the 25 bullets recovered, in order to produce a false impression, that every single piece of the 25 recovered bullets had lost weight, when you know that this is a deliberate lie...

[mike tesko]

The truth of the matter, is that two entirely different bullets were used in the substitution process, one weighing, 23.83g, and a second one, 24.46g. How can two different bullets with conflicting weights be one and the same original bullet lodged inside Sheila Caffells neck, which the pathologist Peter Venezis removed during autopsy, 7th August 1985?
 

[mike tesko]

Standard manufacturers weight for this type of ammunition was 2.26g, yet under Fletchers direct control were two examples of PV/20, one weighing 1.544158g, and the other, 1.714579g...

You have already pointed out that the original PV/20 bullet, is that which the defence expert, Major Mead photographed in May 1986, by comparison against the image shown in the x-ray, so with this in mind if you accept that Fletcher produced a second example upon which he chose to rely in his own calculations, enabling him as it did to match markings upon it to rifle 18, then do you not agree that Fletcher has been guilty of perverting the course of justice?

[mike tesko]

Do you think it is al-right to swap key ballistic evidence which in turn favours the prosecution of someone who might just be innocent in this case?

[mike tesko]

Bullet PV/20 is a very significant exhibit in this case, since it was the bullet fired on that first occasion into Sheila's neck. Now, why would anybody, produce a second example which weighs differently, and carry out a comparison test upon that second example, seeking to match it to the rifle (18), if the original PV/20 had been fired via rifle 18? The simple answer is that you wouldn't, but in Fletchers case, he did...

[mike tesko]

Bullet PV/20 is a very significant exhibit in this case, since it was the bullet fired on that first occasion into Sheila's neck. Now, why would anybody, produce a second example which weighs differently, and carry out a comparison test upon that second example, seeking to match it to the rifle (18), if the original PV/20 had been fired via rifle 18? The simple answer is that you wouldn't, but in Fletchers case, he did...

I ask myself, why would Fletcher need to do what he undoubtedly did do, and produced a second version of bullet PV/20, with the specific intention of matching it to the rifle (18) so that he could conclude as he did, that both of the bullets recovered from Sheila's neck, had indeed been fired by the very same weapon, and that weapon had been the rifle photographed upon her body in crime scene photographs taken by PC Bird? Well, it wouldn't have looked good if the original PV/20 had markings upon it linking it to an entirely different weapon than the one photographed upon her body on the floor of the bedroom now, would it?

[mike tesko]

Fletcher did not decide to tamper with the original bullet PV/20, all by himself - he was requested to do what he did by Essex police, to cover up for the fact that two different guns had been used to shoot Sheila Caffell and kill her, that other gun (which fired the original bullet PV/20) did not belong to the family, it did not belong to any relative, it belonged to Essex police...

[mike tesko]

Fletcher did not decide to tamper with the original bullet PV/20, all by himself - he was requested to do what he did by Essex police, to cover up for the fact that two different guns had been used to shoot Sheila Caffell and kill her, that other gun (which fired the original bullet PV/20) did not belong to the family, it did not belong to any relative, it belonged to Essex police...

ASk yourself, why would Jeremy Bamber (if he be the killer), shoot his sister with use of two different guns, and stage manage her body by placing one of the rifles used to shoot her on top of her body, and honestly expect the police to be fooled into thinking that the same rifle he had placed on her body had fired both shots, if it hadn't? Think about that for a moment. Let it sink in that if two different guns were used to shoot and kill Sheila, how in gods name could anyone expect to get away with positioning only one of these rifles on the victims body, to try and make out a case for her to have taken her own life by way of two two consecutively fired shots from the same gun? Unless of course, you were the police, and you thought you could get away with doing what they undoubtedly did, in the knowledge that if the case progressed through the coroners court, and not become a criminal matter, they could and would have got away with it...

[mike tesko]

When is it going to sink in, that the police really did shoot and kill Sheila Caffell?

[mike tesko]

When is it going to sink in, that the police really did shoot and kill Sheila Caffell?

Jeremy Bamber, did not kill his sister, how exactly could he have, considering that she was shot with a gun that he nor his family or relatives could possibly have had access to, at the time Sheila was shot by use of that gun...

[mike tesko]

How could a sound moderator which belonged to the family, have been fitted to a gun owned by the police that fired the first shot into and across Sheila Caffells throat?

Impossible...

[mike tesko]

Then, we move onto the use of the second gun which fired the all important fatal shot beneath the point of her chin, the family owned, anshuzt rifle. A rifle which from around 7.15am, that morning had always been resting against the bedroom window, until shortly after 9am, when it was brought to Sheila's body during informatives, and during a bizarre accident discharged a solitary round of .22 ammunition under her chin as the weapon was being adjusted on her body, and her hands being gauged to see if she could have reached the trigger. The reason I am mentioning this, was because the rifle leaning against the bedroom window was not fitted with a sound moderator on the end of its barrel - so, here is yet another example, of why the silencer evidence has to be dodgy, because neither of the two rifles used in the shooting of Sheila Caffell were fitted with a sound moderator belonging to the family, or to the relatives...

[scipio_usmc]

You have deliberately sought to deceive everyone into thinking and believing that rounds of manufactured Eley .22LR subsonic hollow point bullets weighed 40 GRAIN, but they do not and did not back in the era when the shootings took place. Your distortion of the true manufacturers bullet weight, produces a conversion weight (into grams) which is heavier than all the recovered individual pieces of the 25 bullets recovered, in order to produce a false impression, that every single piece of the 25 recovered bullets had lost weight, when you know that this is a deliberate lie...

You are lying as you always do. The weight of a complete bullet is 40 grains (2.6 grams) all of the bullet fragments weighed less than this. Thus I have no need to respond to all your bull crap that flows from your bogus assertion the fragments weighed more than complete 22LR rounds.  You start from a false position then make up crap based on the false claim.