Peter Eatons fingerprints found on bloodstained ammunition box found in cupboard

[mike tesko]

Blood and paint was not present upon the same Sound moderator:-

88. As stated earlier it would be logical to infer that where there was blood or paint combined upon the sound moderator, then there would be a note made in the laboratory records at that time.

[mike tesko]

Puzzle of the mixed paint and blood:-


89. Indeed, Brian Elliott testified that there were twenty-eight flakes of paint removed from the knurl, it is submitted they were about the size of a pin head and that the blood would have looked like an additional layer of red paint to the naked eye until tested.

[mike tesko]

Sheila's blood found inside a moderator, unidentified male DNA found on the outside of the moderator, where visible blood had been allegedly mixed with paint (possibly Anthony Pargeters DNA, certainly not Jeremy's):-


90. The Crown asserted at trial that Sheila Caffell was the last to die. It is logical to infer that it would be her blood that would be on the sound moderator. Instead the DNA tested was of a male and its characteristics were similar to Nevill Bamber’s, however it was not Nevill Bamber’s, it was of a similar loci. Anthony Pargeter is Nevill Bamber’s nephew. 

[mike tesko]

Ron Cook, forges paint sample (RWC/1) reference into his pocketbook entry, dated, 14th August 1985:-


91. In any event, DI Cook stated that he took a paint sample on 14th August, yet he actually waited until the 12th September to photograph the underside of the mantelshelf, where it is submitted, the scratch marks were made in corroboration with there being red paint on a sound moderator, (see DI Cook’s pocket book where it is submitted that he has written the facts of the paint sample at a later date, not on the 14th due to his handwritten submission being squeezed in onto a page filled with text; see also document S2, strip 46/0036).

[mike tesko]

Red letter day (12th September 1985) in the police investigation - how the case turned on the introduction of the silencer, blood, paint evidence, at the stroke of a pen:-


92. His assertion that he photographed the scratch marks on 12th September coincidently corresponds with the case being changed to that of five murders by Jeremy Bamber. Jeremy Bamber was first arrested on 8th September 1985.
 

[mike tesko]

Ron Cook, took two paint samples from the kitchen aga, first one (RC/1) he took on the 8th August 1985, and the second (RWC/1) one (if we believe what he is saying) was taken on the 14th August 1985:-


93. Yet COLP Precis, found as fact that two samples were taken, (DS Davidson’s 16th October 1991 interview). The précis states,  ‘paragraph 12 CID6 (6.11) paint samples RC/1 and RC/2. RC = Ron cook.’

[mike tesko]

Who took the second sample (RWC/1)of paint from the aga surround, Ron Cook, or Stan Jones:-


94. While Ann Eaton stated to COLP in her testimony dated 14th May 1991 that, [on 14th August], ‘I clearly remember one of them (DI Cook, DI Miller or DS Jones) producing a pen knife and cutting a sample of paint from the underside of the mantel. It was either DI Cook or DS Jones that actually took the sample. One of them put some yellow/orange sticky tape over where the sample was taken from, (see COLP Statement Ann Eaton pages 50 – 51). 

[mike tesko]

Paint sample, taken on 14th September 1985, not the 14th August 1985, conundrum:-


95. While DI Cook and DS Davidson assert that this was on 14th September 1985. Therefore there is an inference that Ann Eaton as a prosecution witness is not credible.

[mike tesko]

Ron Cook took paint sample from the kitchen aga surround at the scene, after handing over of second sound moderator by Ann Eaton on the 11th September 1985:-


96. Furthermore, David Boutflour in his witness statement dated 17th September 1985, asserts that when he examined the shelf on the 14th August 1985 there was no yellow sticker, he is correct in his assertion. It is submitted that this was not until the actual finding of the sound moderator DRB/1 after the 10th or 11th of September that DI Cook did in fact take his paint sample and placed a yellow sticker over the mark. Therefore David Boutflour should have stated that there was in fact a yellow sticker placed there by DI Cook, (see also paragraphs 95-96). 

[mike tesko]

Dodgy silencer, blood and paint evidence, introduced to secure conviction:-

97. If COLP had had a true inclination to establish the facts then they would have realised that the issue of the scratch marks and the paint on the sound moderator are linked to the provenance and authenticity of the sound moderator.
 

[mike tesko]

Two photographs, taken a month a part, from the same vantage point, illustrates how the scratch mark evidence upon the aga surround has been manufactured between the police and the family conspirators:-


98. Photograph img – 3430. CR2 was taken on 7th August 1985. The image clearly shows the aga surround, fascia and mantel shelf in the kitchen and was taken from the doorway. While photograph img – 3669. CR2 was taken on the 10th September 1985 in exactly the same position of the same area in the kitchen. When comparing both photographs it can be seen quite clearly that someone has scored a mark on the red paint of the fascia, the mark appears as a ‘J’ shape and is larger, deeper and a different shape completely from the earlier photograph. It is submitted that this new scoring was made by a sound moderator. 
 

[mike tesko]

No paint particles on floor mat in photograph taken on 7th August 1985, of aga surround, establishes marks were scoured on a much later occasion:-


99. When looking at photograph img 3520. CR2 the picture shows in close up the mat placed on the floor before the aga. It is possible to magnify this image so that even single hairs can be seen to the naked eye, yet there are no flakes or chips of red paint on the floor or mat directly underneath where the scratch marks were made.

[mike tesko]

No paint particles, anywhere on the kitchen floor / carpet, in photographs taken on the 7th August 1985, establishes that scratch marks were not made during a purported struggle in the kitchen, between Ralph Bamber, and his killer:-


100. While photograph img 3509. CR2 shows the carpet before the cellar door, this door was forced by Essex Police during the raid on White House Farm. The forcing of the door has caused the paintwork to be damaged. The flakes of paint from the damage caused are clearly visible on the carpet, both large and small. This illustrates that where they are obvious on such a light coloured carpet, then similarly the scoring marks would have left debris on the carpet too, and that it would be visible had they been made during the night of the murders.

[mike tesko]

It has not been proven that the family found any sound moderator containing blood which was unique to Sheila, or red paint from the aga surround:-

101. Furthermore, it is submitted that where an exhibit is discovered or seized by members of the public and not by Police Officers, the provenance of the exhibit is in issue. This is accepted by the Crown Court, (see Document 9, trial transcript John Walter Hayward, 10th October 1986, as question to Mr Rivlin QC by Justice Drake).

[mike tesko]

Absence of exhibit label, casts serious doubt on the integrity of Sound Moderator:-

102. Similarly it is submitted that Glynnis Howard’s trial transcript states,  Q: ‘Of course you had no idea yourself just how that sound moderator had been handled by other people before it came to you?’ A: ‘No I didn’t,’ (see Document P – 21).