The main prosecution forensic case

[Mr. Gee]

Tyler, I hope you have seen my 'uncomfortable question' and '26th February deadline' threads.

Feel free to describe in point by point detail how Sheila committed the massacre. You have said you believe Jeremy may be innocent.

The response was very disappointing. Only one poster submitted and then re submitted a summary. Even Jan declined. Automatically resulting in Jeremy losing virtually all his supporters in a 24 hour period.

Unfortunately, I know it must be a terrible blow to your ego Adam, but we are discussing the forensic evidence at this time.
So the question is not how Sheila committed the murders, but rather how did June's blood get on the carpet and socks on the side of the bed that Sheila was found.
So instead of scipio trying to fit it into his pet scenario, he should rather be investigating any logical reason for June's blood being found on Sheila's side of the bed, even if it does mean that she should abandon his scenario and admit he is wrong for once.

[Jane]

I've KNOWN that June's blood had been in more than one place,for MONTHS ! As far as I'm concerned,my own personal " theories " are something that I've refused to print,and still refuse to do so.

Well, with the wounds she sustained whilst still in  her bedroom, would it not have been impossible for her to have moved far from it. I could go with the idea that she got out of bed to go to Neville when he received the first shots -MAYBE even following him onto the landing as he went downstairs- but all the shots to June were at the front, and we know that her head touched her pillow at some stage because of the blood stains.

[Mr. Gee]

Only Alias and David have posted scenarios. David re submitting after an Adam/Scipio massacre. Then promptly being massacred again.

I have repeatedly posted and created threads on Sheila's two shots.

Rather post nothing than post and be wrong like scipio. The trouble with scenarios they are really no better than guesses and what are you going to do if your scenario is found to be wrong? Just because someone is reluctant to post any scenario to satisfy your own curiosity does not mean that they are in any way wrong or do not have thoughts of their own. What it does say is rather that those people will not be drawn into your silly game of scenarios which by their very character cannot be entirely true as they ultimately spring from the mind of the scenario maker, even if they "profess" to be guided by so called "fact" which of course they are not. For if they were then you would not get a variety of scenarios. Let it be understood Adam that just because some will not do as you want them to do it in no way means that they are any less intelligent of imaginative than you are.

[Jane]

Rather post nothing than post and be wrong like scipio. The trouble with scenarios they are really no better than guesses and what are you going to do if your scenario is found to be wrong? Just because someone is reluctant to post any scenario to satisfy your own curiosity does not mean that they are in any way wrong or do not have thoughts of their own. What it does say is rather that those people will not be drawn into your silly game of scenarios which by their very character cannot be entirely true as they ultimately spring from the mind of the scenario maker, even if they "profess" to be guided by so called "fact" which of course they are not. For if they were then you would not get a variety of scenarios. Let it be understood Adam that just because some will not do as you want them to do it in no way means that they are any less intelligent of imaginative than you are.

Good God, Grahame!!! That has to be the first time that anyone has used "intelligent and imaginative" in the same breath as Adam

[lookout]

As I've said for the umpteenth time----------there were two sick women in that house.BOTH on the edge !! A recipe for the biggest disaster to hit the headlines-----and nobody listened.

[Mr. Gee]

Good God, Grahame!!! That has to be the first time that anyone has used "intelligent and imaginative" in the same breath as Adam

I thought I'd go easy on the boy for a change.

[lookout]

I thought I'd go easy on the boy for a change.

He's easily led by the majority,Mr G.

[Jane]

As I've said for the umpteenth time----------there were two sick women in that house.BOTH on the edge !! A recipe for the biggest disaster to hit the headlines-----and nobody listened.

Yes, you have, but it's a moot point as to HOW sick -or NOT- was one of them. I don't know that there can be found proof, one way or the other, and Jeremy needs more than "perhaps" or "maybe" to get freed.

[Jane]

I thought I'd go easy on the boy for a change.

Grahame, I think you'll find he's closer to 70 than 17!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

[Mr. Gee]

Grahame, I think you'll find he's closer to 70 than 17!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

No waaaay?

[lookout]

Yes, you have, but it's a moot point as to HOW sick -or NOT- was one of them. I don't know that there can be found proof, one way or the other, and Jeremy needs more than "perhaps" or "maybe" to get freed.

Put it this way,ONE was sicker than the other. I've been too confident all along that it hadn't been Jeremy. It's SO sensitive a point that I'm going to find great difficulty in explaining it to anyone. 

[David1819]

Tyler, I hope you have seen my 'uncomfortable question' and '26th February deadline' threads.

Feel free to describe in point by point detail how Sheila committed the massacre. You have said you believe Jeremy may be innocent.

The response was very disappointing. Only one poster submitted and then re submitted a summary. Even Jan declined. Automatically resulting in Jeremy losing virtually all his supporters in a 24 hour period.

Adam sorry to break this to you but no one really takes your deadline concept seriously nor did it ever mean anything on this forum.

[Jane]

No waaaay?

Take note of his phraseology and the expressions he uses, Grahame.

[Adam]

Grahame, I think you'll find he's closer to 70 than 17!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

You may be 70. But I was born 17th June just over 17 years ago.

[Jane]

Put it this way,ONE was sicker than the other. I've been too confident all along that it hadn't been Jeremy. It's SO sensitive a point that I'm going to find great difficulty in explaining it to anyone.

Lookout, you may not want to say, but you've dropped so many hints that I imagine we all know -roughly- what you're NOT saying