Neville & Jeremy. The last blazing row ?

[Mr. Gee]

So you're not accepting they nearly came to blows and had a blazing row. Just before the massacre. Although a person put this in a Witness Statement ?

Well then don't comment on what it could have been about.

It depends what the row was about?

[Adam]

It depends what the row was about?

That was the reason I created the thread.

Just before Neville was shot eight times and brutally beaten. What do you think the 'blazing' argument could have been about ?

[Caroline]

That was the reason I created the thread.

Just before Neville was shot eight times and brutally beaten. What do you think the 'blazing' argument could have been about ?

But it's a question no one can answer! 

[Jane]

So you're not accepting they nearly came to blows and had a blazing row. Just before the massacre. Although a person put this in a Witness Statement ?

Well then don't comment on what it could have been about.

But it seems that YOU accept, carte blanche, what AE says, without knowing what she means. You even appear to believe it isn't possible to "get it wrong" in a WS.

 As to what an alleged argument might have been about, I couldn't POSSIBLY comment, it would be arrogant. 

[Alias]

But it's a question no one can answer! 

Isn´t it the rule with most of Adam´s questions? No one can answer them, because we weren´t there. Then, after having asked the question a gazillion times at the end of each and every post, he gives his "answer."

[Adam]

But it's a question no one can answer! 

It's called discussion. And opinion.

There are some things we do know about it. It was at the caravan site meeting. So was about business.

[Jane]

Isn´t it the rule with most of Adam´s questions? No one can answer them, because we weren´t there. Then, after having asked the question a gazillion times at the end of each and every post, he gives his "answer."

And it's SOOOOO easy to give the right answer to questions that no one can answer. Still, if it's the ONLY way of giving it??

[Adam]

Isn´t it the rule with most of Adam´s questions? No one can answer them, because we weren´t there. Then, after having asked the question a gazillion times at the end of each and every post, he gives his "answer."

Feel free to create a thread. If you do not like mine.

The only thing I recall you doing, is posting Julie's NOTW article on here. Several times. Strange actions for someone 'undecided'.

[Jane]

Feel free to create a thread. If you do not like mine.

The only thing I recall you doing, is posting Julie's NOTW article on here. Several times. Strange actions for someone 'undecided'.

It's usually accepted that it's FAR better to do NOTHING really well, than to do SOMETHING extremely badly

[Alias]

Feel free to create a thread. If you do not like mine.

The only thing I recall you doing, is posting Julie's NOTW article on here. Several times. Strange actions for someone 'undecided'.

I have created 58 threads. You have created 208 in a much shorter time span, so you win, what you win I don´t know, and I don´t care!

April has created 37
Aunt Agatha 6
Bambergate 42
Caroline 4
curiousessex 44
Dan Straker 2
Gemma 1
gringo 5
haughton 12
HMEssex 14
JackiePreece 159
Janet (Formerly known as Takeshi) 7
Jan 28
Jo 3
John 3
jon 3
Lookout 18
maggie 21
mat 28
mertol22 61
mike tesko 2007
Mr. Gee 34
neil 7
ngb1066 26
Nickos 8
nugnug 214
originalsin 0
Patti 145
petey 8
Reader 10
Roch 141
scipio_usmc 20
stephanie hall 29
Steve_uk 14
susan 4
tyler 40

So - what does this mean? Nothing. It doesn´t say anything about how active a member is or what value their postings have.
Some of the numbers are misleading, since some, including me, have left and come back, so our numbers are much lower than they should be.

BTW, looks like I am somewhere in the middle - high end if I could count my threads created as "abs".

Please stop going on about how many threads people create - it means nada. Happy to help! 

[Jane]

I have created 58 threads. You have created 208 in a much shorter time span, so you win, what you win I don´t know, and I don´t care!

April has created 37
Aunt Agatha 6
Bambergate 42
Caroline 4
curiousessex 44
Dan Straker 2
Gemma 1
gringo 5
haughton 12
HMEssex 14
JackiePreece 159
Janet (Formerly known as Takeshi) 7
Jo 3
John 3
jon 3
Lookout 18
maggie 21
mat 28
mertol22 61
mike tesko 2007
Mr. Gee 34
neil 7
ngb1066 26
Nickos 8
nugnug 214
originalsin 0
Patti 145
petey 8
Reader 10
Roch 141
scipio_usmc 20
stephanie hall 29
Steve_uk 14
susan 4
tyler 40

So - what does this mean? Nothing. It doesn´t say anything about how active a member is or what value their postings have.
Some of the numbers are misleading, since some, including me, have left and come back, so our numbers are much lower than they should be.

BTW, looks like I am somewhere in the middle - high end if I could count my threads created as "abs".

Please stop going on about how many threads people create - it means nada. Happy to help! 

Alias!!!! That's BRILLIANT!!! WELL DONE!!! Perhaps THAT will stop his bragging.

[lookout]

Go to the top of the class for taking the trouble,Alias. -------------- It seems to matter in one case.

[Alias]

 

Overlooked Jan, have added her to the list - 28 threads. Sorry Jan, and sorry anyone else I might have overlooked. I went through the list rather quickly. 

[Adam]

I do not recall any of you're threads. Apart from the 'Purpose of guilters' thread. Maybe you do not recall mine, although you post on most of them. Such as this one.

Anyway I have just created a thread - 'Stan Jones contaminating the silencer'.

This is a new and very serious accusation from another poster. And needs to be discussed fully. If correct, Bamber must be released.

[Alias]

I do not recall any of you're threads. Apart from the 'Purpose of guilters' thread. Maybe you do not recall mine, although you post on most of them.

Anyway I have just created a thread - 'Stan Jones contaminating the silencer'.

This is a new and very serious accusation from another poster. And needs to be discussed fully. If correct, Bamber must be released.

Your problem. The numbers speak for themselves.