Author Topic: Did Jeremy wear a wet suit for the massacre ?  (Read 8818 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Alias

  • Editor
  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 9435
  • What is in those 200 boxes?
Re: Did Jeremy wear a wet suit for the massacre ?
« Reply #75 on: November 19, 2014, 08:25:PM »
What do you think Jeremy wore for the massacre ?

How would I know?! I don´t want to play your silly games. You don´t know, I don´t know - he could have been at home in his bed sleeoing in his Adam costume. There.

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48670
Re: Did Jeremy wear a wet suit for the massacre ?
« Reply #76 on: November 19, 2014, 08:29:PM »
How about solving the problem of Sheilas' prints all over the shotgun ? What was she doing with it because she didn't use it to shoot anyone ? Maybe as a threat at first ?

How do we know that Neville used the downstairs phone when he rang Jeremy ? Seeing as he " was in bed " ,did he use the office phone ? NOBODY KNOWS,do we ? !

This all kicked off upstairs in the bedroom--------not the kitchen,though ended up there when Neville had attempted to go downstairs followed by Sheila,prodding him.




The light was on in the main bedroom all the time,so quite easy to have seen a silhouette from outside as WAS SEEN,contrary to what others say.

I very much doubt that Jeremy would have started switching all the lights on in order to murder all the family. That's another ludicrous and far-fetched assumption. Why would he have needed the lights on ?

Offline Adam

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 44324
Re: Did Jeremy wear a wet suit for the massacre ?
« Reply #77 on: November 19, 2014, 08:41:PM »
How would I know?! I don´t want to play your silly games. You don´t know, I don´t know - he could have been at home in his bed sleeoing in his Adam costume. There.

That's a good point. He did tell the police he slept 'like a log' that night. His downstairs phone have been loud.
'Only I know what really happened that night'.

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48670
Re: Did Jeremy wear a wet suit for the massacre ?
« Reply #78 on: November 19, 2014, 08:46:PM »



The light was on in the main bedroom all the time,so quite easy to have seen a silhouette from outside as WAS SEEN,contrary to what others say.

I very much doubt that Jeremy would have started switching all the lights on in order to murder all the family. That's another ludicrous and far-fetched assumption. Why would he have needed the lights on ?





I'm going to continue posting/talking over you,Adam,because you're not taking a blind bit of notice of my posts.All you're concerned in is posting on your own bloody thread !

Offline Adam

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 44324
Re: Did Jeremy wear a wet suit for the massacre ?
« Reply #79 on: November 19, 2014, 08:49:PM »



The light was on in the main bedroom all the time,so quite easy to have seen a silhouette from outside as WAS SEEN,contrary to what others say.

I very much doubt that Jeremy would have started switching all the lights on in order to murder all the family. That's another ludicrous and far-fetched assumption. Why would he have needed the lights on ?

I agree he will not have switched the lights on pre massacre. Post massacre he would have, while he was staging everything.

Leaving the lights on inside WHF is a good idea. It gives the impression people were awake while Sheila was around.
'Only I know what really happened that night'.

Offline scipio_usmc

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 9502
Re: Did Jeremy wear a wet suit for the massacre ?
« Reply #80 on: November 20, 2014, 01:32:AM »

The light was on in the main bedroom all the time,so quite easy to have seen a silhouette from outside as WAS SEEN,contrary to what others say.

I very much doubt that Jeremy would have started switching all the lights on in order to murder all the family. That's another ludicrous and far-fetched assumption. Why would he have needed the lights on ?

So he could aim accurately at his victims.  That is what lights are for so you can see and he wanted to see what he was shooting at.

You ask pretty silly questions. 

Politeness is organized indifference- Paul Valéry

Offline scipio_usmc

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 9502
Re: Did Jeremy wear a wet suit for the massacre ?
« Reply #81 on: November 20, 2014, 01:43:AM »
How about solving the problem of Sheilas' prints all over the shotgun ? What was she doing with it because she didn't use it to shoot anyone ? Maybe as a threat at first ?

How do we know that Neville used the downstairs phone when he rang Jeremy ? Seeing as he " was in bed " ,did he use the office phone ? NOBODY KNOWS,do we ? !

This all kicked off upstairs in the bedroom--------not the kitchen,though ended up there when Neville had attempted to go downstairs followed by Sheila,prodding him.

Sheila's prints all over what shotgun?  Mike mad ethe claim up there wa sno shotgun with her prints on i.
Politeness is organized indifference- Paul Valéry

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48670
Re: Did Jeremy wear a wet suit for the massacre ?
« Reply #82 on: November 20, 2014, 08:44:AM »
So he could aim accurately at his victims.  That is what lights are for so you can see and he wanted to see what he was shooting at.

You ask pretty silly questions.






And you give silly answers ! Was Jeremy short-sighted at the time,or partially blind that he had to have all the lights on in a house where he'd lived for years and could probably find his way around blindfold ??
Don't be so ridiculous and EVASIVE !

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48670
Re: Did Jeremy wear a wet suit for the massacre ?
« Reply #83 on: November 20, 2014, 08:47:AM »
Sheila's prints all over what shotgun?  Mike mad ethe claim up there wa sno shotgun with her prints on i.





 The shotgun which was found in another room by AE ( WHO ELSE ? ) You'll find that in part of her statement if you care to read the garbled thing.

Mr. Gee

  • Guest
Re: Did Jeremy wear a wet suit for the massacre ?
« Reply #84 on: November 20, 2014, 09:46:AM »
So he could aim accurately at his victims.  That is what lights are for so you can see and he wanted to see what he was shooting at.

You ask pretty silly questions.
So you contradict Adam then? For he says the lights were off. You two really are going round in circles chasing your own tails aren't you. All we actually know about the lights is in the contradictory police reports when some say the lights were on and some say they were off. That is all we know, period. So it'd a bit useless speculating on this isn't it, especially when you two profess to only follow the facts. Give me strength. ::)

Offline nugnug

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 17251
    • http://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CDMQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fjohnnyvoid.wordpress.com%2F&ei=WTdUUo3IM6mY0QWYz4GADg&usg=AFQjCNE-8xtZuPAZ52VkntYOokH5da5MIA&bvm=bv.5353710
Re: Did Jeremy wear a wet suit for the massacre ?
« Reply #85 on: November 20, 2014, 01:09:PM »
How would I know?! I don´t want to play your silly games. You don´t know, I don´t know - he could have been at home in his bed sleeoing in his Adam costume. There.

he wore clown shoes and a top hat and i challenge anybody to prove otherwise.
« Last Edit: November 20, 2014, 03:05:PM by nugnug »

Mr. Gee

  • Guest
Re: Did Jeremy wear a wet suit for the massacre ?
« Reply #86 on: November 20, 2014, 01:12:PM »
That's a good point. He did tell the police he slept 'like a log' that night. His downstairs phone have been loud.
I thought he told Julie he couldn't sleep?

Offline ngb1066

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6671
Re: Did Jeremy wear a wet suit for the massacre ?
« Reply #87 on: November 20, 2014, 01:42:PM »
Sheila's prints all over what shotgun?  Mike mad ethe claim up there wa sno shotgun with her prints on i.

A fingerprint of Sheila was found on a double barrel 12 bore (to you 12 guage) shotgun. 


Offline nugnug

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 17251
    • http://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CDMQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fjohnnyvoid.wordpress.com%2F&ei=WTdUUo3IM6mY0QWYz4GADg&usg=AFQjCNE-8xtZuPAZ52VkntYOokH5da5MIA&bvm=bv.5353710
Re: Did Jeremy wear a wet suit for the massacre ?
« Reply #88 on: November 20, 2014, 02:33:PM »
meaning she had touched the shotgun.

Offline susan

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 16196
Re: Did Jeremy wear a wet suit for the massacre ?
« Reply #89 on: November 20, 2014, 02:56:PM »
Hi nugnug I was under the impression that the shotgun had one finger print of Sheila's on it and it was found in the downstairs toilet.