Author Topic: The Week of the Murders  (Read 28589 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Alias

  • Editor
  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 9435
  • What is in those 200 boxes?
Re: The Week of the Murders
« Reply #390 on: September 09, 2014, 01:06:AM »
It has been removed in scipio´s post, but it is quoted in mat´s. It still says here, on your wonderful board,  that I am ridiculous. I am not happy. You must still think it is OK.
I feel that it is looked upon mildly that members are being bullied.
Some things I posted were removed, so I think it is fair that I ask that what is demeaning about me be entirely removed as well.
« Last Edit: September 09, 2014, 01:08:AM by Alias »

Offline Caroline

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 27076
Re: The Week of the Murders
« Reply #391 on: September 09, 2014, 02:34:AM »
It has been removed in scipio´s post, but it is quoted in mat´s. It still says here, on your wonderful board,  that I am ridiculous. I am not happy. You must still think it is OK.
I feel that it is looked upon mildly that members are being bullied.
Some things I posted were removed, so I think it is fair that I ask that what is demeaning about me be entirely removed as well.

I guess by 'you' - you mean me? You just have to point out the post Alias - I can't be expected to see everything. A PM would have sufficed.   
Few people have the imagination for reality

Offline Adam

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 44353
Re: The Week of the Murders
« Reply #392 on: September 09, 2014, 03:26:AM »
I agree, it is FAR more difficult for you Lookout (and the other innocent supporters) given that the evidence points to guilty!!  ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D

When I joined here I thought it would take two or three weeks to show Jeremy was guilty.

But did not realise how loyal his supporters were. They all dug in and refused to budge. Focusing on me instead of my posts.

However some posters have gone from innocent to guilty. Some have refused to change their stance despite overwhelming evidence of his guilt.

New posters have joined, with innocent and guilty views.
'Only I know what really happened that night'.

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48676
Re: The Week of the Murders
« Reply #393 on: September 09, 2014, 02:15:PM »
Going back to one or two posts from 2011, something interesting to consider and that was both Neville and Junes black eyes ( prior to the murders  ?) and the gouge ( which was covered ) on Sheilas' abdomen ?
Also,the burn marks on Nevilles' back/neck would have been caused by someone forcing him to go where the killer wanted him to go. Would Jeremy bother with all this if his aim had been just to enter the farmhouse,shoot them all then scarper ? You don't start leading people to where you want them to be,you just quick-fire and out ?

I'm studying older posts because I didn't join until 2012,and a lot are quite interesting and thought provoking instead of at present,going over old ground that isn't so old------- but more repetitive.

I think it's about time I wrote to Jeremy to ask a few questions instead of sitting wondering.

No-Bits

  • Guest
Re: The Week of the Murders
« Reply #394 on: September 09, 2014, 02:26:PM »
Going back to one or two posts from 2011, something interesting to consider and that was both Neville and Junes black eyes ( prior to the murders  ?) and the gouge ( which was covered ) on Sheilas' abdomen ?
Also,the burn marks on Nevilles' back/neck would have been caused by someone forcing him to go where the killer wanted him to go. Would Jeremy bother with all this if his aim had been just to enter the farmhouse,shoot them all then scarper ? You don't start leading people to where you want them to be,you just quick-fire and out ?

I'm studying older posts because I didn't join until 2012,and a lot are quite interesting and thought provoking instead of at present,going over old ground that isn't so old------- but more repetitive.

I think it's about time I wrote to Jeremy to ask a few questions instead of sitting wondering.

If you do, can you ask him whether he needed to fire a second shot in to Sheila to kill her, or was it an accident with him miscalculating the number of remaining bullets, due to him not realising that after shooting Nevill four times in the kitchen and reloading the partially full magazine, it resulted in there being 11 bullets loaded.

Out of these 11 bullets he distributed 8 to the twins and 1 to June. Did he think that he had left a single bullet for Sheila, yet to his horror there were two, with the second being discharged accidentally?
« Last Edit: September 09, 2014, 02:28:PM by Harters »

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48676
Re: The Week of the Murders
« Reply #395 on: September 09, 2014, 02:30:PM »
 Just as if I'd ask him a question like that  ;D ;D ;D ;D I'm far more subtle and diplomatic. ::)

Offline Caroline

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 27076
Re: The Week of the Murders
« Reply #396 on: September 09, 2014, 02:35:PM »
Going back to one or two posts from 2011, something interesting to consider and that was both Neville and Junes black eyes ( prior to the murders  ?) and the gouge ( which was covered ) on Sheilas' abdomen ?
Also,the burn marks on Nevilles' back/neck would have been caused by someone forcing him to go where the killer wanted him to go. Would Jeremy bother with all this if his aim had been just to enter the farmhouse,shoot them all then scarper ? You don't start leading people to where you want them to be,you just quick-fire and out ?

I'm studying older posts because I didn't join until 2012,and a lot are quite interesting and thought provoking instead of at present,going over old ground that isn't so old------- but more repetitive.

I think it's about time I wrote to Jeremy to ask a few questions instead of sitting wondering.

Hmmmmm, interesting, I already asked him about the black eye and he said he didn't remember it.
Few people have the imagination for reality

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48676
Re: The Week of the Murders
« Reply #397 on: September 09, 2014, 04:29:PM »
Hmmmmm, interesting, I already asked him about the black eye and he said he didn't remember it.





In which case,if he's being truthful,he didn't do it. So no violence there then.

Sheila was also a self-harmer too,so there's every possibility that she'd done something nasty to herself. It would be held in her medical notes if it wasn't inflicted on the night of the tragedy ??
I'm flinching here thinking about similar wounds to Neville ( described as gouges ).

Offline susan

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 16196
Re: The Week of the Murders
« Reply #398 on: September 09, 2014, 04:37:PM »
Caroline was it June that had a black eye or Ralph Bamber?

Offline Caroline

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 27076
Re: The Week of the Murders
« Reply #399 on: September 09, 2014, 04:40:PM »
Caroline was it June that had a black eye or Ralph Bamber?

Both but Neville's black eyes were most likely due to his injuries. Jeremy mentioned that June had a black eye 'before' her death and when he asked her about it, she said she walked into a post. When I asked him about it, he said he didn't remember any black eye.
Few people have the imagination for reality

Offline scipio_usmc

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 9502
Re: The Week of the Murders
« Reply #400 on: September 09, 2014, 04:46:PM »
Both but Neville's black eyes were most likely due to his injuries. Jeremy mentioned that June had a black eye 'before' her death and when he asked her about it, she said she walked into a post. When I asked him about it, he said he didn't remember any black eye.

The swelling near her eye could have been caused by the bullet that went between her eyes.
Politeness is organized indifference- Paul Valéry

Offline JackiePreece

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4743
Re: The Week of the Murders
« Reply #401 on: September 09, 2014, 04:54:PM »
If you do, can you ask him whether he needed to fire a second shot in to Sheila to kill her, or was it an accident with him miscalculating the number of remaining bullets, due to him not realising that after shooting Nevill four times in the kitchen and reloading the partially full magazine, it resulted in there being 11 bullets loaded.

Out of these 11 bullets he distributed 8 to the twins and 1 to June. Did he think that he had left a single bullet for Sheila, yet to his horror there were two, with the second being discharged accidentally?


Lookout find out all you can about the peter eaton fraud it shows great deception and greed from the family
"No hour of life is wasted that is spent in the saddle" Winston Churchill

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48676
Re: The Week of the Murders
« Reply #402 on: September 09, 2014, 05:04:PM »
The swelling near her eye could have been caused by the bullet that went between her eyes.





The black eye of Junes' happened a few days before the tragedy,as June was unable to attend her Sunday church.

Offline JackiePreece

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4743
Re: The Week of the Murders
« Reply #403 on: September 09, 2014, 05:14:PM »
Barbara Wilson thought Peter Eaton couldn't keep his stick fingers out of the till and that was before Jeremy was convicted

How low is that robbing a dead family's estate

And we are expected to believe Anne and Peters statements about Jeremy
"No hour of life is wasted that is spent in the saddle" Winston Churchill

Offline scipio_usmc

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 9502
Re: The Week of the Murders
« Reply #404 on: September 09, 2014, 05:26:PM »
Barbara Wilson thought Peter Eaton couldn't keep his stick fingers out of the till and that was before Jeremy was convicted

How low is that robbing a dead family's estate

And we are expected to believe Anne and Peters statements about Jeremy

None of her allegations went anywhere.  The only details we have seen regarding these alelgations is that they were pretty pathetic.

Instead of relying on unfounded allegations you need to produce evidence.

Naturally you can't do so because you neve reven looke dinto the facts in any depth- BW made an allegation you like so it means the allegations are true.  That is the extent of how you operate.  For someone supposedly so involved in the campaign your knowledge of the facts in the case is wretched.  You and lookout seem to not be aware of the actual evidence and facts discussed ad nauseum on this very board.

Debating people uninformed of the facts is a waste of time when they have no interest in becoming informed.  a quote from Heinlein is apropos, "Never attempt to teach a pig to sing; it wastes your time and annoys the pig."

Politeness is organized indifference- Paul Valéry