Surely The Timings Are Incorrect?

[Caroline]

I'm making a separate thread for this because it's quite an important aspect (given the number of times it's been discussed).

The timings must surely be wrong? Bonnet actually states that he received a call from CD 1990 (West) at 03:26. If the call is being relayed to him by West at 03:26, Jeremy MUST have called 'before' then with enough time to explain to West his story and for West to have contacted Bonnet.

[No-Bits]

You sound like Adam. 

[Caroline]

You sound like Adam. 

OOOOO!! That's not nice!! 

However, I'm rising above it  . You didn't answer the question though, how can Bonnet receive a call from West at 03:26, after Jeremy had called him and yet West has recorded the time of Jeremy's call as 03:36, which is 10 minutes AFTER he relays Jeremy's call t Bonnet? Bit mad??? 

[nugnug]

I'm making a separate thread for this because it's quite an important aspect (given the number of times it's been discussed).

The timings must surely be wrong? Bonnet actually states that he received a call from CD 1990 (West) at 03:26. If the call is being relayed to him by West at 03:26, Jeremy MUST have called 'before' then with enough time to explain to West his story and for West to have contacted Bonnet.

so that would be 3;21 at the latest that is of course if west has recorded the time correctly.

[No-Bits]

OOOOO!! That's not nice!! 

However, I'm rising above it  . You didn't answer the question though, how can Bonnet receive a call from West at 03:26, after Jeremy had called him and yet West has recorded the time of Jeremy's call as 03:36, which is 10 minutes AFTER he relays Jeremy's call t Bonnet? Bit mad??? 

Sorry, I apologise. 

Clearly it's not possible. West, for whatever reason, recorded the time of Jeremy's call incorrectly.

[Caroline]

Sorry, I apologise. 

Clearly it's not possible. West, for whatever reason, recorded the time of Jeremy's call incorrectly.

I agree but Jeremy's call MUST (by the same token) have been BEFORE 03:26, if that was the time of West's call to Bonnet?

[nugnug]

or west has written the time down incorrectly.

[Adam]

http://jeremybamberforum.co.uk/index.php/topic,1103.msg34166.html#msg34166

West received his phone call from Jeremy at 3.36. It was recorded at this time. But was obviously an error and was 3.26. See link.

[Adam]

West contacted Witham police station himself, and told Jeremy a car was it's way.

[Adam]

Jeremy claimed he had tried to contact Witham police station. But got no answer.

West rang Witham, and guess what ?

[No-Bits]

I agree but Jeremy's call MUST (by the same token) have been BEFORE 03:26, if that was the time of West's call to Bonnet?

Yes, West indicates that he spoke to JB before making the call to Bonnett, so the call from JB to West is clearly shortly before the call from West to Bonnet which as we know was recorded at 3:26 by Bonnett. Therefore the call from JB to West must have taken place at say 3:20-3:25 depending on how long JB and West spoke, prior to West then contacting Bonnett.

[Caroline]

Yes, West indicates that he spoke to JB before making the call to Bonnett, so the call from JB to West is clearly shortly before the call from West to Bonnet which as we know was recorded at 3:26 by Bonnett. Therefore the call from JB to West must have taken place at say 3:20-3:25 depending on how long JB and West spoke, prior to West then contacting Bonnett.

So, if the call from Jeremy was much earlier, it has quite a few implications. It was alleged that he called Julie as late as 3:30, but that would make the call 'after' the call to the police so his timing of his call to Julie (which I 'think' was about 03:15) is probably more accurate if he called her before the police? Also, it kind of clears up the notion that cars were dispatched 'before' his call?

[nugnug]

but there one thing if west can translate a call from jeremy as if it was a call from Nevile his time keeping any more accurate.

[No-Bits]

So, if the call from Jeremy was much earlier, it has quite a few implications. It was alleged that he called Julie as late as 3:30, but that would make the call 'after' the call to the police so his timing of his call to Julie (which I 'think' was about 03:15) is probably more accurate if he called her before the police? Also, it kind of clears up the notion that cars were dispatched 'before' his call?

Well obviously police cars would not have been dispatched before they were made aware of an incident.  :D

He's claimed two different versions of whether he called Julie before or after the police.

He called Julie first, but couldn't talk for long because he had to call the police?
He called Julie second because he was p***** off at the police?

Going from her flat mates testimony and that I don't recall seeing Julie mention that JB had said he'd called the police when he spoke to her, it would appear to me that he spoke to Julie first and the police second.

[No-Bits]

Well obviously police cars would not have been dispatched before they were made aware of an incident.  :D

He's claimed two different versions of whether he called Julie before or after the police.

He called Julie first, but couldn't talk for long because he had to call the police?
He called Julie second because he was p***** off at the police?

Going from her flat mates testimony and that I don't recall seeing Julie mention that JB had said he'd called the police when he spoke to her, it would appear to me that he spoke to Julie first and the police second.

Whichever version is correct, he has clearly lied, it's not just a 'muddle up' as he's then extended the explanation to try and convince people that he's telling the truth by justifying why he did one action or the other.

He seems to do this regularly, you don't just get an answer to a question, you also get an argument as to why he must be telling the truth.