The murder of 14 year-old schoolgirl Jodi Jones near Edinburgh on 30 June 2003

[FreeWillieGage]

If you tell everyone and convince yourself of something for almost 9 years, repeating it will have no affect on a lie detector test.

[susan]

Wow the parrot talks during the night as well

[nugnug]

If you tell everyone and convince yourself of something for almost 9 years, repeating it will have no affect on a lie detector test.

he fought to take the test and past that says alot to me his mum past a lie detector as well and shes his albi

it would be hard for both of them to pass it if they were lying or are they both deluded.

[maggie]

he fought to take the test and past that says alot to me his mum past a lie detector as well and shes his albi

it would be hard for both of them to pass it if they were lying or are they both deluded.

That's true nugnug, unfortunately no one's listening.  A lie detector test can be dismissed as not proof in this country.  Psychological and psychiatric test results can be doubted and sneered at, where is the power?

[nugnug]

funny though they use they youse same lie detector tests to dicide weather there going to relase dangrous sex offenders into the community if they really think there that untrustworthy they should stop using them.

[maggie]

funny though they use they youse same lie detector tests to dicide weather there going to relase dangrous sex offenders into the community if they really think there that untrustworthy they should stop using them.

Couldn't agree more nugnug.

[nugnug]

i wonder if anyone else involved in the case would be willing to take the same lie detector test.

[FreeWillieGage]

and why has it taken so many years for Luke to offer to take one? Funny it was only after his mum tested it that he felt confident enough to do it eh?

[nugnug]

it was the first time they were offered they jumped at the chance to take it and they both passed i wonder who else involved in the case will except the challenge to take one.

[FreeWillieGage]

you say his mums his alibi, but on the frontline documentary when asked "have you ever asked luke if he killed jodi" she didnt once say "no because he was with me at the time" she answered "I didnt have to because a mother can just tell", it wouldn't be a case of motherly instinct helping you decide your son was innocent if you were with him at the time and knew for a fact it couldnt have been him, it wouldnt be left to motherly instinct to base ur opinion on. corinne messed up there. that was her chance to tell every one it couldnt have been him, luke was with her, nope she didnt mention it once.

[FreeWillieGage]

it was the first time they were offered they jumped at the chance to take it and they both passed i wonder who else involved in the case will except the challenge to take one.

why should anyone else have to take one? they obviously all had an alibi. the police wanted to clear luke at the time but just couldnt.

[nugnug]

she did mention it in the lie detector test witch she passed.

[nugnug]

why should anyone else have to take one? they obviously all had an alibi. the police wanted to clear luke at the time but just couldnt.

most of them have no credible albi the police had luke down as there only suspect from day 1.

and were not intresteded any other suspects.

these other suspects keep whingeing about accused but they could stop that very easily be taking the test.

[FreeWillieGage]

she did mention it in the lie detector test witch she passed.

like i said, do you know how polygraphs work, what kind of reactions detect dishonesty? one wouldnt experience these reactions if they were simply re-stating the same position they have for all these years.

[FreeWillieGage]

most of them have no credible albi the police had luke down as there only suspect from day 1.

and were not intresteded any other suspects.

luke was a suspect from day 1? why did they interview 3000 people if they already had their man?