Confidential Information, I can now reveal that destroys credibility of silencer

[mike tesko]

With this in mind, how could anyone realistically say that the AK/1 blood enzyme which formed part of the loose flake found in the silencer be human rather than animal, or vice versa?

It simply is not possible to differentiate between the AK/1 blood enzyme found in animal or human blood - here lies the problem regarding blood group results relied uoon to convict Bamber of these murders ...

The prosecutions blood experts who testified, deliberately failed to mention in any report the presence of animal blood found on and inside the silencer, because they realized that to do so woukd be harmful to the proposition that blood found in the silencer was unique and exclusive to Sheila Caffell, since the only part of the result obtained from examination of the flake,  which made the case for it to be Sheila's blood was the AK/1 enzyme, belonging to animal and human blood, if for this reason the AK/1 enzyme has to be excluded, it produces a collection of results (A, EAP BA, and HP 2-1) that are therefore  not exclusive or unique to Sheila, it makes it even more likely that the blood found in the silencer in the form of the loose flake, to be an intimate mixture of the parents bloods, to a far greater extent than was acceptible at trial...

[mike tesko]

There is something else I have not yet mentioned, something which is an eye opener...

[mike tesko]

There is something else I have not yet mentioned, something which is an eye opener...

How strange that no blood at all was found anywhere at all on the inner surface of the silencers main tubing...

[mike tesko]

Glynis Howard discovered the animal blood, John Hayward presented the case for blood of the loose flake to be unique and exclusive to Sheila Caffell...

[mike tesko]

Glynis Howard discovered the animal blood, John Hayward presented the case for blood of the loose flake to be unique and exclusive to Sheila Caffell...

The verdict of the jury is unsafe, for the simple reason that it involved arguments from both parties which if proven one way or the other, the case could not be settled on the sole issue of blood found in the silencer being exclusive and unique to Sheila, or an intimate mixture of the parents bloods, since purely based on the results obtained from static blood could be an intimate mixture of the parents bloods, whereas the collective results obtained from examination of the loose flake, which included the dubious AK/1 enzyme, could arguably be Sheila's blood. Jeremy was in a lose lose situation, since he had no prospect of proving that all the blood was an intimate mixture of the parents blood, since the results obtained from static blood favoured the defence arguments, whereas the results obtained from the loose flake favoured the prosecutions case...

The jury were told in no uncertain terms, by the trial judge in summing up, that they could decide guilt or innocent by who's blood was actually inside the silencer, but this was clearly a decisive error, with blood from both sets of argument present in the silencer...

[mike tesko]

If the AK/1 result had been excluded from the examination of the loose flake on the basis it might be animal rather than human blood, the defence arguments would have been favoured, surely resulting in an acquital...

[Reader]

What will destroy the whole credibility of the case is the information that Jeremy inadvertantly received which was under PII. Sent by mistake when Jeremy requested material for this latest CCRC application.

I wasn't aware of this. Where can I read more about it?

[lookout]

I wasn't aware of this. Where can I read more about it?

It was on the Bambertweets site,Reader. One of the regular supporters who keeps in touch with Jeremy was told . There isn't a lot more to read about it really because nobody knows what the info contained.
It might even be on Simon McKays' site.

[grahameb]

It was on the Bambertweets site,Reader. One of the regular supporters who keeps in touch with Jeremy was told . There isn't a lot more to read about it really because nobody knows what the info contained.
It might even be on Simon McKays' site.

That it very interesting. I never knew that either?