Motive for murders - Jeremy versus the relatives...

[mike tesko]

I have one thing to say, which I feel may be important, it concerns hand written notes of Ann Eaton -  she writes about her husband putting the gun back at whf on the evening of 9th August 1985...

As far as I know, a gun was not missing from the scene, but a gun silencer was..

[grahameb]

It does Caroline but how could anyone have seen blood that looked like a blob of jam. They really couldn't have done, the most they would see is a dark discoloured mark??

Unless it was planted the night before. But certainly not from the night of the murders. I wonder if anyone suggested to David Boutflour to look in the gun cupboard? Otherwise my theory is rubbish, as it would have been found by chance and the planter would not let that happen.

[maggie]

Unless it was planted the night before. But certainly not from the night of the murders. I wonder if anyone suggested to David Boutflour to look in the gun cupboard? Otherwise my theory is rubbish, as it would have been found by chance and the planter would not let that happen.

So, I wonder whose blood it was if planted the night before???

[lookout]

You have to ask yourself why the relatives were overly keen to see Jeremy behind bars,,and it wasn't just the fact that they " thought " he'd committed the crime,either. They ALL went out of their way to nail him,, yet one of them knows for sure that it wasn't Jeremy. My thoughts.

Not forgetting that RWB was earwigging into the call that Pam made to June on the night of the murders.
Why on earth would someone,,a man even,,,listen intently to that call ? Why did it matter so much ?

[susan]

Hello lookout  do you genuinely think the rellies thought Jeremy had actually committed the murders from the onset or was it something they thought later.  Why would they think he had committed this horrendous crime when the police were satisfied 4 murders one suicide what made them think this was not the case.

[bigdaveglasgow75]

what member of the family beleives hea innocent lookout??

[bigdaveglasgow75]

what member of the family thinks jeremy didnt do it?

[susan]

Hi Dave none of them as far as I know

[Jane]

Hello lookout  do you genuinely think the rellies thought Jeremy had actually committed the murders from the onset or was it something they thought later.  Why would they think he had committed this horrendous crime when the police were satisfied 4 murders one suicide what made them think this was not the case.

Susan, I don't think they THOUGHT he did it until it dawned on them that it would be much more convenient for them if he HAD done it. Bottom line alway s was that if it was Sheila Jeremery walked away with the lion's share. If Jeremy did it, THEY got the lion's share.......................oh, and the money returned to the family.

[nugnug]

well some of them might privately think it some of them might privately know it.

[susan]

nugnug some of them know it and the others know it as well

[lookout]

what member of the family beleives hea innocent lookout??

Dave,,I would say that they ALL thought him innocent,,and possibly still do,,but it suited them to think things over which ran in their favour,such as finding the silencer.Why was it ever taken to the house of the relatives if it was known to have their prints on it ? It's the last thing anyone would do is to touch anything belonging to a crime scene,let alone remove it,unscrew the innards and start scraping dried blood from it.
The hair that originally went missing,,could have belonged to RWB seeing that he also had joined in with the dismantling. Strange how it went missing,eh.?
Not forgetting,,,it was the police who stated 4 murders and a suicide.The relatives decided otherwise,,and whatever they said,,went. Such as the downgrade that Jeremy received inside,from C back to A. That was the relatives doing because they'd said " they lived in fear " in case he escaped !
The same relatives that handed Jeremy two rifles after the killings !

[maggie]

Susan, I don't think they THOUGHT he did it until it dawned on them that it would be much more convenient for them if he HAD done it. Bottom line alway s was that if it was Sheila Jeremery walked away with the lion's share. If Jeremy did it, THEY got the lion's share.......................oh, and the money returned to the family.

Think the return of the money to the family was VERY VERY important

[susan]

Hello april  did you ever watch the video The Money Trail it is absolutely amazing what Jeremy would have owned and what they thought they owned but he would have owned it.  It was a real eye opener what a mess they would have been in had Jeremy been found not guilty and claimed what was legally his and none of this was disclosed to the Jury.  I suppose it is easy to convince yourself of something you really want to believe.

[lookout]

Susan,,this is exactly what has happened regarding the relatives.They have convinced themselves that Jeremy was the culprit. It's quite easy for some to live their lives like this,,though at the same time,they're keeping a watchful eye on what is happening,,,which you would not do if you weren't bothered about something. I very much doubt that for one minute,that the relatives have sat back with ease.