0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
He did reference documents Hartley. I have seen them. Me not a kidder! :D :D :D :D
My goodness me, what is wrong with people, you seem so desperate to believe something that all logic goes out of the window.I will say once more: Whatever Lomax says in his book is simply his opinion, if he has referenced documents then that's great, but you would need to see that document to ensure that Lomax's interpretation is correct.On that very basis, this is not proof, the referenced document may be, but Lomax's book is not. As very sensibly suggested by Caroline, you would need to see the source.On a similar note, there is a claim in Shaws manuscript that Peter punched Nevill and gave a report number as reference, the trouble is, when you saw that report, it didn't actually say what Shaw claimed it did.This is true of all books, regardless of who they are written by.
Hartley I would claim it was you who over reacted. I quoted a mention in a book of a Major Incident Report that is all. I dont believe I claimed I had solved the case. A few of you this am were posting you had never seen any official proof about the sighting in the window. It was suggested this was made up later by Jeremy. In response to those posts I posted up that a Major Incident Report apparently Existed. That is all.
Maggie, Hartley is much closer to the "relatives" than you may suppose, although he may kid you of the contrary. How can a man be neutral when he has someone else's interest at heart? His simply cannot investigate from a neutral position however hard he tries. That is why he will twist things he says to make it seem he said something quite the opposite. If there is a direct reference in a book without adulteration to the document, then that document is true. If on the other hand that writer expresses his opinion "only" then that is suspect. May I suggest that the document be published on the forum if anyone has access to the original?
Gosh..this thread is going to the dogs lol.I have a copy of Lomax's book right in front of me!
69 ITEMS MAJOR INCIDENT REPORT PAGE 1 OF 2ITEM SU FO AD 1. 0345 S11 MYALL UNIDENT MALE 0001 WHITE HSE FM 2. 2011 N94 UNIDENT MALE 0029 PAGES LN 3. 2015 N94 UNIDENT MALE 0038 PAGES LNThis is all that the photograph of the report shows unfortunately.Underneath photo it says -: The beginning of the Major Incident Report in the White House Farm Case,which records that PC MYALL claimed he saw the figure of a person inside White House Farm at 03:45 whilst Bamber was stood outside the building.
There is a photo dog it in the lomas book, and this is an old thread on the subject:
Lol where did 'dog it' come from in my post?
I'm looking at it right now! Problem is,its not dated and I had thought that both the officers and Jeremy did not arrive at whf until around 4am? I posted earlier that it may refer to surveillance carried out post murders?
