Author Topic: Sensational New evidence that Ballistic expert did not want anyone to know about  (Read 3243 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
So...

by 13th August 1985, the barrel of the anshulz rifle had been wiped clean by the introduction of Fletchers first cloth pull through, but it was not exhibited, and they tried to conceal for the fact that it had been done at all...

Why?

(1) - Cloth pull through test performed on 13th August 1985 - contaminated with blood from inside barrel of Anshulz rifle, which if true would be inconsistent with use of silencer that only had blood inside it at the top end where a bullet would exit...

(2) - Cloth pull through test performed on 12th September 1985 - no blood found upon it ( MDF/1 ),  consistent with prosecutions case that silencer was fitted to guns barrel and that blood got into top part of silencer by a process of backsoatter when Sheila was shot and killed...
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
(1) - Cloth pull through test performed on 13th August 1985 - contaminated with blood from inside barrel of Anshulz rifle, which if true would be inconsistent with use of silencer that only had blood inside it at the top end where a bullet would exit...

(2) - Cloth pull through test performed on 12th September 1985 - no blood found upon it ( MDF/1 ),  consistent with prosecutions case that silencer was fitted to guns barrel and that blood got into top part of silencer by a process of backsoatter when Sheila was shot and killed...

In order to prosecute Jereny Bamber and be able to rely on the bloid, and paint contaminated silencer, if we are a corrupted investigation, we get rid of the cloth pull through evidence obtained / performed on 13th August 1985 - and that is precisely what this motley crew of dishonest police officers and experts did...
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
In order to prosecute Jereny Bamber and be able to rely on the bloid, and paint contaminated silencer, if we are a corrupted investigation, we get rid of the cloth pull through evidence obtained / performed on 13th August 1985 - and that is precisely what this motley crew of dishonest police officers and experts did...

Case solved...
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

jim ignatowski

  • Guest
Case solved...
i'm sorry, and perhaps the fault is mine, but i don't understand how, if a pull through test was performed on august 13th, and all traces of blood were thereby removed from the barrel, that factor explains or negates the relevance of the presence of human blood found inside (about 4 or 5 baffles from its end) the sound moderator. further, of course, that blood was found to be that of sheila (albeit there was a remote possibility that such blood was an admixture of june and neville's blood). the fact that blood was found inside the sound moderator surely establishes that the sound moderator was fitted to the barrel at the time of the shootings and, of course, it is highly relevant that it was considered to be sheila's blood since she was of such stature as to be unable to kill herself with the sound moderator attached to the rifle.
perhaps it can be explained to me quite how this is sensational new evidence
in anticipation of any response, can i say that i do not understand how blood inside the barrel is necessarily inconsistent with the sound moderator being attached at the time of the shootings

Offline Reader

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2456
The relevant part of page 8 of MDF's notes of 13/8/85 is near the beginning:

Work done — Pull barrel through, but sketched gun and removed
                      blood samples. Similarly with SM and magazine.
                      Police obtaining gun/SM/mag for superglue f-printing. Will
                      take care not to overwork it and try and preserve
                      bore and mark.

("f-printing" could be "/ -printing" and "obtaining" could be "staining"; the handwriting is not very clear.)

Can you confirm, mike, that the second image is of your own notes? If not your own, who wrote them?

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
The relevant part of page 8 of MDF's notes of 13/8/85 is near the beginning:

Work done — Pull barrel through, but sketched gun and removed
                      blood samples. Similarly with SM and magazine.
                      Police obtaining gun/SM/mag for superglue f-printing. Will
                      take care not to overwork it and try and preserve
                      bore and mark.

("f-printing" could be "/ -printing" and "obtaining" could be "staining"; the handwriting is not very clear.)

Can you confirm, mike, that the second image is of your own notes? If not your own, who wrote them?

Reader - handwritten notes at post 10 in this thread are mine...
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...