Author Topic: Why did police use two different cameras to record the position of body?  (Read 1131 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
Why did police use two different  to record the position of body?

Why use two different , and two different negative strips to photograph position of Sheila'a body in the bedroom, and to which negative strip can the missing 8 negatives be associated with, or too?
« Last Edit: January 08, 2012, 04:15:PM by mike tesko »
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

Offline tonyb

  • Senior Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1235
  • Time to disembark the magical mystery tour...
In case one didn't work? remember it's not like the digital age. Double redundancy in equipment is something I have in my business. Save's fortune's in down time. Just a suggestion
Don't enjoy the cold weather.

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
In case one didn't work? remember it's not like the digital age. Double redundancy in equipment is something I have in my business. Save's fortune's in down time. Just a suggestion

Could be, but I am willing to bet that the missing 8 negatives relate to just one of these negative strips, and camera, and that the photographs of Sheila on the bed were originally recorded on one of these cameras, a feature which can be identified by reference to these three photographs, the key image being the black and white one, which does not fit in with the sequence of events as recorded in the other camera and two consecutively coloured images...
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

Offline ngb1066

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6671
Could be, but I am willing to bet that the missing 8 negatives relate to just one of these negative strips, and camera, and that the photographs of Sheila on the bed were originally recorded on one of these cameras, a feature which can be identified by reference to these three photographs, the key image being the black and white one, which does not fit in with the sequence of events as recorded in the other camera and two consecutively coloured images...

You are correct Mike.  I also suspect you are right about what the missing negatives show.


Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
You are correct Mike.  I also suspect you are right about what the missing negatives show.

yet to be fathomed out, is who had possession of each of these two different camera's and negative strips? This is important, because of the camera which has the two pictures in colour, must have been in the possession of PC Bird, and i am guessing the other camera which took the black and white image was probably in the possession of the training team or someone who was overseeing what they did or were doing?

Now...

if true, and because of the photographs I have seen of Sheila on the bed, it leads me to conclude that the training officers could have been responsible for Sheila being shot for the second time, hence why there appears to have been some sort of a cover up about the role they played and who formed part of this training exercise?
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
Police obviously took footage of where body of Sheila was originally found (on bed) , and moved to (floor) - and the camera which originally recorded this sequence of events must have been used before SOC took control of the scene, at 10am...
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...