Author Topic: Julie Charged As An Accomplice To Murder?  (Read 19598 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline ILB

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 13164
Re: Julie Charged As An Accomplice To Murder?
« Reply #270 on: August 06, 2024, 08:47:PM »
Remember this was "the perfect crime." I doubt he ever loved Julie, but she was a different female in that she made the time to listen to him, he feeling unburdened thereafter. But Julie was unprepared for the confidences which Jeremy broached, and the intricacy of the trap he had set her. She was used, deceived and finally attempted extrication, though alas too late to stop the tragedy.

Many people believe she encouraged him and was actively involved. Others of course hardcore supporters think she's a liar and was spurned.

I'm undecided
If yesterday you hated me. Then today you can not stop the love that binds from me to you. And you to me

Offline Steve_uk

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 21102
Re: Julie Charged As An Accomplice To Murder?
« Reply #271 on: August 06, 2024, 09:11:PM »
Jeremy I believe was just as potentially academic as Julie. He just didn't apply himself. Perhaps the knowledge of having wealthy parents culled his academic career long term thinking he'd always be alright financial wise.

He was a maths genius.
It's true he may have bandied figures about in his head, but as it transpired, for nefarious purposes only.

Offline Steve_uk

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 21102
Re: Julie Charged As An Accomplice To Murder?
« Reply #272 on: August 06, 2024, 09:12:PM »
Many people believe she encouraged him and was actively involved. Others of course hardcore supporters think she's a liar and was spurned.

I'm undecided
For those who experienced teaching practice in an ILEA school in the 1980s, I can state categorically she would have had enough on her plate already.

Offline ILB

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 13164
Re: Julie Charged As An Accomplice To Murder?
« Reply #273 on: August 06, 2024, 09:51:PM »
For those who experienced teaching practice in an ILEA school in the 1980s, I can state categorically she would have had enough on her plate already.

Money is tempting and a remedy.
If yesterday you hated me. Then today you can not stop the love that binds from me to you. And you to me

Offline Steve_uk

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 21102
Re: Julie Charged As An Accomplice To Murder?
« Reply #274 on: August 06, 2024, 10:18:PM »
Money is tempting and a remedy.
But she never relinquished her teaching career, she refused the offer of a flat from June and she didn't get pregnant by him and demand a council house in Manningtree.

Offline ILB

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 13164
Re: Julie Charged As An Accomplice To Murder?
« Reply #275 on: August 06, 2024, 10:43:PM »
But she never relinquished her teaching career, she refused the offer of a flat from June and she didn't get pregnant by him and demand a council house in Manningtree.

Julie states that Jeremy told her he couldn't have children.

Also believe a farm worker stated that Jeremy did not wish to have children.


If yesterday you hated me. Then today you can not stop the love that binds from me to you. And you to me

Offline Steve_uk

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 21102
Re: Julie Charged As An Accomplice To Murder?
« Reply #276 on: August 06, 2024, 10:57:PM »
Julie states that Jeremy told her he couldn't have children.

Also believe a farm worker stated that Jeremy did not wish to have children.
Well, I don't recall that anywhere. It can't be true anyway if Suzette suffered miscarriages as she claimed.

Offline ILB

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 13164
Re: Julie Charged As An Accomplice To Murder?
« Reply #277 on: August 07, 2024, 12:09:AM »
Well, I don't recall that anywhere. It can't be true anyway if Suzette suffered miscarriages as she claimed.

I will find you the passage

In fairness to Jeremy these are Julie's words not his.
« Last Edit: August 07, 2024, 12:10:AM by ILB »
If yesterday you hated me. Then today you can not stop the love that binds from me to you. And you to me

Offline Adam

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 44415
Re: Julie Charged As An Accomplice To Murder?
« Reply #278 on: August 07, 2024, 12:38:PM »
Sensible posters from both sides will agree Julie's WS is true.

No woman would perjure herself so seriously with a 23 page WS and several days testifying in court.

Even the defence at trial had to resort to bringing up a totally unrelated minor cheque book fraud from 2 years earlier.
« Last Edit: August 07, 2024, 12:56:PM by Adam »
'Only I know what really happened that night'.

Offline Adam

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 44415
Re: Julie Charged As An Accomplice To Murder?
« Reply #279 on: August 07, 2024, 12:42:PM »
How people interpret her WS & court testimony has differred. Within both sides.

Suggestions have included - 

Babe in the woods.

Gold digger.

Passive collaborator.

Pro active collaborator.

Rabbit caught in the headlights.

Should have been put in prison.

Brave to approach the police.

Should have approached them on the 7th August.

Approached the police to save her skin.

Approached the police to do the right thing.

----------

Maybe there is a bit of truth in all of these.
« Last Edit: August 07, 2024, 12:52:PM by Adam »
'Only I know what really happened that night'.

Offline Jane

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 33782
Re: Julie Charged As An Accomplice To Murder?
« Reply #280 on: August 07, 2024, 12:56:PM »
How people interpret her WS & court testimony has differred. Within both sides.

Suggestions have included - 

Babe in the woods.

Gold digger.

Passive collaborator.

Pro active collaborator.

Rabbit caught in the headlights.

Should have been put in prison.

Brave to approach the police.

Should have approached them on the 7th August.

Approached the police to save her skin.

Approached the police to do the right thing.

----------

Maybe there is a bit of truth in all of these.



From which ever side of the divide one supports, it wasn't her finest moment and she didn't come out of it smelling of roses.

Offline David1819

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 13787
Re: Julie Charged As An Accomplice To Murder?
« Reply #281 on: August 07, 2024, 04:03:PM »
Many people believe she encouraged him and was actively involved. Others of course hardcore supporters think she's a liar and was spurned.

I'm undecided

Her claims are factually inaccurate and contains within it false information she could only have got from either the police or Ann Eaton.

Those who believe Julie is telling the truth subscribe to a coincidence theory whereby Jeremy confesses with all the false details that Ann Eaton and DC Clarke happened to believe at the time.

I suggest you read the following posts -

https://jeremybamberforum.co.uk/index.php/topic,8753.msg419820.html#msg419820

https://jeremybamberforum.co.uk/index.php/topic,10006.msg458825.html#msg458825

There is also in existence a copy of a NTOW agreement signed and dated by Julie pre trial. Despite telling the jury she had made no such agreement. Why the defence at trial never looked into finding such paperwork to begin with is rather astonishing.
« Last Edit: August 07, 2024, 04:08:PM by David1819 »

Offline Steve_uk

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 21102
Re: Julie Charged As An Accomplice To Murder?
« Reply #282 on: August 07, 2024, 04:49:PM »
Her claims are factually inaccurate and contains within it false information she could only have got from either the police or Ann Eaton.

Those who believe Julie is telling the truth subscribe to a coincidence theory whereby Jeremy confesses with all the false details that Ann Eaton and DC Clarke happened to believe at the time.

I suggest you read the following posts -

https://jeremybamberforum.co.uk/index.php/topic,8753.msg419820.html#msg419820

https://jeremybamberforum.co.uk/index.php/topic,10006.msg458825.html#msg458825

There is also in existence a copy of a NTOW agreement signed and dated by Julie pre trial. Despite telling the jury she had made no such agreement. Why the defence at trial never looked into finding such paperwork to begin with is rather astonishing.

Whether Jeremy told Julie the twins died last it has no legal standing affecting the law of commorientes. As for the other stuff, it was some weeks after the event and Julie cannot be expected to remember every detail, words which in the first place came from Jeremy's mouth and which were, in any case, compromised thereby.
« Last Edit: August 07, 2024, 04:50:PM by Steve_uk »

Offline Adam

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 44415
Re: Julie Charged As An Accomplice To Murder?
« Reply #283 on: August 07, 2024, 07:00:PM »
Whether Jeremy told Julie the twins died last it has no legal standing affecting the law of commorientes. As for the other stuff, it was some weeks after the event and Julie cannot be expected to remember every detail, words which in the first place came from Jeremy's mouth and which were, in any case, compromised thereby.

Julie did get the amount of shots Nevill received wrong. Suspect Bamber had lost count.

I have asked David  multiple times why and when AE would alert Bamber's girlfriend people suspected him. He has never answered.

There was no signed NOTW contract pre verdict.
'Only I know what really happened that night'.

Offline ILB

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 13164
Re: Julie Charged As An Accomplice To Murder?
« Reply #284 on: August 07, 2024, 08:11:PM »
Julie did get the amount of shots Nevill received wrong. Suspect Bamber had lost count.

I have asked David  multiple times why and when AE would alert Bamber's girlfriend people suspected him. He has never answered.

There was no signed NOTW contract pre verdict.

James Weatherup, a NOTW journalist suggested on the theroux documentary that there was.
If yesterday you hated me. Then today you can not stop the love that binds from me to you. And you to me