Barbara De"ath discussing sea wall

[ILB]

I provided sources of villages with no artificial lighting.

Can you walk/cycle about where you live without artificial lighting?

Final time I will ask this.

No because they have streetlights that have been put there by the council and if I remove them I will end up in court. I can't change where I live.

That's not an evasive answer. It's common sense. I live in Sheffield. You will agree of course living in London.

[Adam]

Again it's only you saying that on planet Adam.

Reality however 

Are you saying Head Street, Church Street & Maldon Road is not tarmac?

[ILB]

Are you saying Head Street, Church Street & Maldon Road is not tarmac?

What has this got to do with visibility ?

[Adam]

No because they have streetlights that have been put there by the council and if I remove them I will end up in court. I can't change where I live.

That's not an evasive answer. It's common sense. I live in Sheffield. You will agree of course living in London.

Your claim that Bamber couldn't cycle in outside darkness has been dismissed - X 2.

[Adam]

What has this got to do with visibility ?

So you agree it was perfect terrain for cycling.

But believe only Bamber couldn't cycle in outside darkness where he lived & worked. Compared to thousands/millions of other people who lived in Goldhanger & other villages.

[ILB]

So you agree it was perfect terrain for cycling.

But believe only Bamber couldn't cycle in outside darkness where he lived & worked. Compared to thousands/millions of other people who lived in Goldhanger & other villages.

Are you familiar with the road route. I am sure you are.

Do you accept that the long main road is rural.

Cycling that 2am, when surrounded by fields and not natural lighting is hard enough.

Also running the risk of getting hit by a car.

Accept of course the traffic would be next to none at that hour.

[Adam]

Snow's Bamber cycling obstacle is the most convincing - he may get a sore bottom.

Bamber did have a bottom and the bike did have a seat.

However he would be highly motivated for over 500k.

[ILB]

Your claim that Bamber couldn't cycle in outside darkness has been dismissed - X 2.

No it hasn't.

What have I failed to answer ?

You are asking me a question and I previously answered.

Please stop being deceptive and putting a spin on things.

[ILB]

Snow's Bamber cycling obstacle is the most convincing - he may get a sore bottom.

Bamber did have a bottom and the bike did have a seat.

However he would be highly motivated for over 500k.

Agree 500k is tempting. However I don't believe from a gulity stand point it was the lone factor in his choice if he did it.

But we are discussing the transport aspect of the case.

[Adam]

Are you familiar with the road route. I am sure you are.

Do you accept that the long main road is rural.

Cycling that 2am, when surrounded by fields and not natural lighting is hard enough.

Also running the risk of getting hit by a car.

Accept of course the traffic would be next to none at that hour.

Hit by a car?

Where did that car on Maldon Road suddenly appear from? One minute it was 150 yards away, the next it's hitting me.

[ILB]

Shame Bamber didn't have a home countries Johnnie Cochran.

" If he can't shoot the route, he didn't kill them for the loot"

[ILB]

Hit by a car?

Where did that car on Maldon Road suddenly appear from? One minute it was 150 yards away, the next it's hitting me.

I didn't want to do this but I suppose you leave me no choice.

[ILB]

That's tollsebury road. Imagine 3am 7.8.85 where's the lighting Adam.

Please don't say the sky.

[ILB]

If you agree he " could cycle visibility wise on that road " I will have dismiss you.

[ILB]

No bike light no street lighting no other artificial lighting.