The window Jeremy used for entry

[Zoso]

I can look at that from two points of view.

On paper things can appear sinister but have a totally innocent explination

You can argue Jeremy killed his family and then proceeded to rifle through nevills wallet and pocket the proceeds

Or you can argue jeremy could make a rough estimate of what was in there. From going in the wallet himself for example if nevill sent him on the bacon sandwich run, nevill telling jeremy how much was in there, Jeremy seeing nevill. Pull out the wallet, etc etc he was his son

Yes, lots of explanations - but not one from Jeremy - not until two years later and then he gave me a very odd response. I have been through this many times and what happens, is people who don't know what happened, add their slant to it. You asked me a question and I answered. The matter is closed for me - I believe he knew because he looked. Others can believe what they like. It makes no difference one way or another - except to me.

So, did he answer your letter about the answer phone?

[ILB]

Yes, lots of explanations - but not one from Jeremy - not until two years later and then he gave me a very odd response. I have been through this many times and what happens, is people who don't know what happened, add their slant to it. You asked me a question and I answered. The matter is closed for me - I believe he knew because he looked. Others can believe what they like. It makes no difference one way or another - except to me.

So, did he answer your letter about the answer phone?

Jeremy Bamber avoided a question you were asking him for two years but you still corresponded with him?

[Zoso]

Jeremy Bamber avoided a question you were asking him for two years but you still corresponded with him?

No, I stopped, he wrote to me because someone here told him I had changed my stance - I told him why. THEN he answered the wallet question. But that's enough about that now.

He didn't reply about the answer phone did he?

[Adam]

Bamber entered through the bathroom window. Which he may have left ajar a few hours earlier.

He exited through the kitchen window. Moving fixed items around the window.  Banging the top latch into place from outside.

[Adam]

Mike and ILB met Bamber in prison. Both want to support a fellow inmate.

Mike really believed Bamber innocent. Creating this forum.

ILB is well aware he is guilty, but will firefight everything.

[Zoso]

No, I stopped, he wrote to me because someone here told him I had changed my stance - I told him why. THEN he answered the wallet question. But that's enough about that now.

He didn't reply about the answer phone did he?

I knew he wouldn't.

[Jane]

Jeremy Bamber avoided a question you were asking him for two years but you still corresponded with him?

When a person repeatedly refuses to answer a question, it appears to suggest that, if given, the answer would be in favour of/be of benefit to the questioner. I can see a certain similarity, here.

[Roch]

When a person repeatedly refuses to answer a question, it appears to suggest that, if given, the answer would be in favour of/be of benefit to the questioner. I can see a certain similarity, here.

How does that work, with questions to Essex Police?

[ILB]

Mike and ILB met Bamber in prison. Both want to support a fellow inmate.

Mike really believed Bamber innocent. Creating this forum.

ILB is well aware he is guilty, but will firefight everything.

As always on the fence lean to innocence

[snow66!]

No, I stopped, he wrote to me because someone here told him I had changed my stance - I told him why. THEN he answered the wallet question. But that's enough about that now.

He didn't reply about the answer phone did he?

Would you mind telling us what answer he finally gave you about the wallet Zoso,just for completion please. Then we can judge the whole of your correspondence with him on that issue.

[Adam]

As always on the fence lean to innocence

You have never given any reasons for innocence 

[ILB]

You have never given any reasons for innocence

Yes I have.

[David1819]

Would you mind telling us what answer he finally gave you about the wallet Zoso,just for completion please. Then we can judge the whole of your correspondence with him on that issue.

"22/4/13         JEREMY BAMBER
                         A5352AC
                         HM FULL SUTTON
                         YORK
                         YO411PS

DEAR XXXXXXXX
I THOUGHT THAT ID ANSWERED
YOUR LAST LETTER, BUT MAY
BE NOT - I GET A BIT
MUDDLED SOMETIMES AS
I GET LOADS OF MAIL WHEN
THAT SKY TV PROGS ON AND
I DON'T KNOW QUITE WHAT
I'M DOING. I KNOW YOU
ASKED ME A PARTICULAR
QUESTION - I CANT RECALL
WHAT IT WAS NOW - I KNOW
THE ANSWER WAS NO OR
ITS NOT TRUE."

[Zoso]

Would you mind telling us what answer he finally gave you about the wallet Zoso,just for completion please. Then we can judge the whole of your correspondence with him on that issue.

Not going into all that again, it's on the forum. Anyway, maybe you should be more concerned with what he said to ILB about the answer phone. You all were arguing about it for weeks, he suggests asking Bamber and coming back to the forum with an answer. Now he's just avoiding the subject - I don't get it. If Bamber didn't answer his question, kind of supports what I'm saying.

[Zoso]

The man childs post is from the second time I asked, as you can see, he didn't answer 'the question'. You can't answer a question that you can't remember. it's BS. He knows it, Bamber knows it and I know it. When he finally did answer it (two YEARS down the line), he admitted to not forgetting it. He said he didn't answer because HE didn't think it was important and then he said he didn't mention any amount when talking to Ann. That's also a lie - Jeremy is a master of the double talk - or rather he thinks he is.