Two hundred pieces of evidence against Bamber

[Adam]

Jeremy Bamber admitted to taking the bike from WHF and keeping it at his house in Goldhanger.

He says he took the bike about a week before the murders happened, without giving a specific date.

He said this during his interviews after becoming a suspect.

He said he took the bike so that Julie could ride it.

So, you make of that what you will.

Lookout has very limited knowledge of the case.

She supports Bamber because he sent her a Christmas card.

Similar to QC, she will focus on the poster when she has no counter evidence.

[Adam]

Two hundred pieces of evidence in defence of Bamber----that EP have retained for nearly 37 years !
From over 600 letters and packs containing information on the case which were sent out to all MP's, ONE had been acknowleged ! David Davis, once Secretary of State was the only MP to reply, with interest, and ONE person in the House of Lords also answered and showed her interest. Everywhere else,it fell on deaf ears as usual.

This is not just JB's case but others too who've been let down by the justice system as 9 out of 10 cases of MOJ's involves the withholding of evidence. Shocking statistics in what is classed as a democratic society.

These are MP's that we the public, put where they are ! Why ? Their sheer ignorance in not affording a reply surely tells us all that their interest in the general public is totally zilch.

No Lookout. The thread refers to 200 pieces of evidence which incriminate Bamber. Detailed in the thread post.

[lookout]

Lookout has very limited knowledge of the case.

She supports Bamber because he sent her a Christmas card.

Similar to QC, she will focus on the poster when she has no counter evidence.

On the contrary, it would appear that your knowlege has reached rock bottom when you constantly refer to Christmas cards which I find really boring and very very childish ! Try reading up about the case using your own initiative and not that of books and the media. Pity you aren't able to think for yourself without looking for others to blame to hide your own incompetence.

[lookout]

No Lookout. The thread refers to 200 pieces of evidence which incriminate Bamber. Detailed in the thread post.

I'll do it my way, the same as you do, so kindly refrain from telling me what to do !

[Adam]

On the contrary, it would appear that your knowlege has reached rock bottom when you constantly refer to Christmas cards which I find really boring and very very childish ! Try reading up about the case using your own initiative and not that of books and the media. Pity you aren't able to think for yourself without looking for others to blame to hide your own incompetence.

You know nothing about the case & have never provided a source.

This is disappointing as it prevents good discussion.

[lookout]

You know nothing about the case & have never provided a source.

This is disappointing as it prevents good discussion.

I know more about the case than you do ! Yours is just hearsay, assumptions and general guesswork !

[lookout]

If you profess to know more than anyone else, tell us all why, after 37 years,are EP still withholding vital evidence which could help JB's defence, and what you think that evidence contains ?
Or are you the same as all the useless politicians who are scared of the can of worms that could see them with egg on their faces and a huge bill ?

[Adam]

If you profess to know more than anyone else, tell us all why, after 37 years,are EP still withholding vital evidence which could help JB's defence, and what you think that evidence contains ?
Or are you the same as all the useless politicians who are scared of the can of worms that could see them with egg on their faces and a huge bill ?

No evidence is being withheld.

The millions of released evidence documentation confirms Bamber's guilt.

The obvious counter tactic is to always say there is hidden evidence.

[Adam]

Any hidden evidence will have to be proof of a deliberate frame attempt. On one or several pieces of evidence.

So far this has not been found.

[lookout]

Any hidden evidence will have to be proof of deliberate a deliberate frame attempt. On one or several pieces of evidence.

So far this has not been found.

Have you ever made any enquiries as to the hidden evidence ? No you haven't ! So how do you know that there isn't ? What do you make of the high-court demands/ requests for evidence of which has been refused ? Shouldn't you also be interested in this as part of our democratic system to show transparency ? Or are you more of a snake who wishes things to be buried forever to save face ?

[Adam]

Have you ever made any enquiries as to the hidden evidence ? No you haven't ! So how do you know that there isn't ? What do you make of the high-court demands/ requests for evidence of which has been refused ? Shouldn't you also be interested in this as part of our democratic system to show transparency ? Or are you more of a snake who wishes things to be buried forever to save face ?

Lookout Bamber was arrested in 1985 & convicted in 1986.

You know 36 years later there is nothing being hidden.

[Jane]

Have you ever made any enquiries as to the hidden evidence ? No you haven't ! So how do you know that there isn't ? What do you make of the high-court demands/ requests for evidence of which has been refused ? Shouldn't you also be interested in this as part of our democratic system to show transparency ? Or are you more of a snake who wishes things to be buried forever to save face ?

Just out of interest, has there ever been a list made of those items of evidence which are claimed to be withheld? I know it was once said that JB had to name every item he was requesting, prior to its release. He has subsequently claimed "We now have everything we need". I also wonder what is the point of the courts making demands for the release of evidence without naming the evidence, especially as JB claims to "...now have everything..."?

[lookout]

Lookout Bamber was arrested in 1985 & convicted in 1986.

You know 36 years later there is nothing being hidden.

We ALL know about the arrest etc etc etc etc.
I KNOW that nigh-on 37 years gone that documents/ files are WITHHELD ! Got it ?? Obviously you haven't so you know NOTHING !

[lookout]

Just out of interest, has there ever been a list made of those items of evidence which are claimed to be withheld? I know it was once said that JB had to name every item he was requesting, prior to its release. He has subsequently claimed "We now have everything we need". I also wonder what is the point of the courts making demands for the release of evidence without naming the evidence, especially as JB claims to "...now have everything..."?

Whatever it is that's missing should link up with documents already in-situ and clearly, just like a jig-saw puzzle, it shows a huge gap. We aren't going to know the contents of the said files/documents for some unknown reason, though after all these years it is iffy.
JB has stated that " we now have everything " in the hope that when these files were requested via the high court, he'd thought it would have sealed the deal.

I would doubt that today JB would utter those same words after they were sorely let down. This being obvious because the request for the withheld files still stands. Whether the team have any ideas of their contents I don't know, or whether the CCRC can work their fluence on EP we've yet to see.   

[snow66!]

We ALL know about the arrest etc etc etc etc.
I KNOW that nigh-on 37 years gone that documents/ files are WITHHELD ! Got it ?? Obviously you haven't so you know NOTHING !

Of course documents have been withheld Lookout,the campaign team and Peter Tatchell didnt stand outside Essex police station and hand in a petition just for the fun of it.