Sequence of events surrounding the silencer.

[Jane]

People complain to ngb about Adam because he is incessant in his trolling. I agree he's not the only one that is in the wrong on here. I also believe that if everyone had him on ignore, it would dull his interventions to background noise.

Roch! You have a choice. It's called an ignore button. Leave others to do as they will without inciting. Or do you like it when posters are goaded and insulted to give sport?

[Adam]

Posters on here use different abuse methods -

JackieD is an 'in your face' abuser. She will dive straight in without hesitation with hardcore abuse. 

QC uses patronising tactics. Or will call posters trolls, spammers, complain, or do all three if his posts are questioned.

David trolls old posts looking for ways to attack posters who have changed stance. He will copy & paste the same quote if COA evidence is quoted or if feeling threatened.

Lookout floats around the forum & will use the personal attack method if she feels Jeremy is being attacked.

[David1819]

Are you sure about that. 

If memory serves me correctly. NGB stated that and proceeded to call him a 'tosser' and told him to seek psychiatric help.

I made no secret I had you on ignore when all you ever did was goad Caroline and Jane. 

I was only responding to their own goading and attacks on me. I even started posting on another forum to get away from them and they soon followed me onto that forum. So, you work out who was causing trouble.

[guest7363]

If memory serves me correctly. NGB stated that and proceeded to call him a 'tosser' and told him to seek psychiatric help.

I was only responding to their own goading and attacks on me. I even started posting on another forum to get away from them and they soon followed me onto that forum. So, you work out who was causing trouble.

You’ve done nothing but goad Jane since she returned, she’s done the right thing and put you on ignore.  She hasn’t complained to NGB though I bet!

[Steve_uk]

Steve_uk is the poster that NGB gets annoyed by the most. Should NGB no longer gives his time to nuisance posters, Steve_uk will probably be the first to be purged. Several posters have him on ignore for a reason.

Maybe it's because I discover the inaccuracies in your posts and don't let them pass.

[Roch]

Roch! You have a choice. It's called an ignore button. Leave others to do as they will without inciting. Or do you like it when posters are goaded and insulted to give sport?

Alright, I'll put him on ignore again. I only took him off to give him a chance and engage with some of his questions.

[Roch]

You’ve done nothing but goad Jane since she returned, she’s done the right thing and put you on ignore.  She hasn’t complained to NGB though I bet!

You say he has goaded Jane, I think his questions to her are fair. Though I admit they are a bit repetitive.

[guest7363]

You say he has goaded Jane, I think his questions to her are fair. Though I admit they are a bit repetitive.

You have just contradicted yourself there I’m afraid.

[Roch]

You have just contradicted yourself there I’m afraid.

I think some of his questions to her are fair. I don't always agree with the way they are worded.

[JackieD]

People are sick of you for one introducing obscenity to the Forum. We didn't have this problem before you arrived. As far as Adam's posts are concerned, time was you couldn't get enough of them.

No they are not sick to death of QC. You personally have been warned numerous times about your language and the content of your posts

Don’t keep posting rubbish

[JackieD]

You can't seriously endorse Adam's posting record? It's patently clear and has been for years, that his presence here is to disrupt and ruin the forum.

Exactly

[JackieD]

There are several here who deserve, far more so than Adam, to be labelled "disruptive". I doubt there's a poster here who hasn't been attacked, OR can claim never to have attacked. For some, it's only about retaliation, for others, it's intolerance of another's views.

There you go again more vicious attacks and more trolling

[David1819]

You say he has goaded Jane, I think his questions to her are fair. Though I admit they are a bit repetitive.

Repetitive only because they go un-answered.

[JackieD]

At least he’s not abusive and labels others as cock suckers and degrades the moderator who gives his to run the forum.  You’ve just witnessed David labelling another poster as a alcholic, I don’t know who CC is yet you both goad him/her, purely because you can’t beat them with posts.

Absolutely nonsense QC, David and Roch know more about the case than you and there lies the problem because you know times running out for the people who perverted the course of justice in the Bamber trial

[lookout]

Posters on here use different abuse methods -

JackieD is an 'in your face' abuser. She will dive straight in without hesitation with hardcore abuse. 

QC uses patronising tactics. Or will call posters trolls, spammers, complain, or do all three if his posts are questioned.

David trolls old posts looking for ways to attack posters who have changed stance. He will copy & paste the same quote if COA evidence is quoted or if feeling threatened.

Lookout floats around the forum & will use the personal attack method if she feels Jeremy is being attacked.

Me ? Personal attacks ? That's a LIE !!