Author Topic: Bamber directly & indirectly admitting guilt:  (Read 931 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline killingeve

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 299
Re: Bamber directly & indirectly admitting guilt:
« Reply #15 on: October 21, 2021, 09:38:PM »
He's never been given the chance to speak out giving his own version, which has never changed----unlike the chopping and changing with everyone else's versions.

The ITV and Sky programmes helped JB's cause as it brought people's attention to the fact that the investigation was too good to be true. Both programmes contradicted documented evidence. The public aren't stupid.

Hasn't changed?  He could not even recall whether he called the police before Julie Mugford or vice-versa and that was in the immediate aftermath.

I believe he has actually changed his version of events to fit the phone logs.

Bamber had his say in his witness statements, police interviews and trial.  The Ministry of Justice bent over backwards to allow the interview with David James Smith.  He now has his support group to do his bidding via social media.

Agreed the public aren't stupid since hence jurors found Bamber guilty when all the evidence was put before them.  Few are remotely interested. I'm here to experience something eccentric. Bet he wishes he could get a young heavyweight on board like Greta Thunberg or Malala Yousafzai. 

Offline Adam

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 44394
Re: Bamber admitting guilt:
« Reply #16 on: October 22, 2021, 11:43:AM »
I've amended the thread title.

David are you able to post the referred to video again? It is no longer on your 'Bambinator' thread.

Thanks.

It looks like David is not going to post the video again.

Not sure if David took it down on the 'Bambinator' thread when attempting his quiet stance change from hardcore guilter.
'Only I know what really happened that night'.