Author Topic: Further views on PV Weasel words?  (Read 2614 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Bubo bubo

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3357
Further views on PV Weasel words?
« on: October 17, 2021, 04:45:PM »

This post is prompted by David1819’s quote regarding the actions of PV in the CAL Propaganda novel.

I am sure he would re-post it if asked.

You should familiarise yourself with PV’s statements on this site.

Statements 07/05/86 and 12/11/86.

At the meeting following autopsies (08/07/85) with all the key players present he clearly states that for JB to have been the perpetrator Sheila would have to have been drugged.  Heavy emphasis is placed on the need for a drug analysis.

In the CAL quote this aspect is completely ignored even though he mentions his reasons for wishing to test for them.

There is no evidence to support Sheila being drugged by a third party.

Despite contacts with RC he does not mention being asked for this information even though it was a key piece of information for the investigation. You would have thought that EP would be seeking this fundamental evidence verbally on a number of occasions, given its vital importance to the course of the investigation. You would think they would be chasing him because if JB was innocent it would change the focus of investigation to Sheila or some other third party. One of the contacts from RC was at least a month later (After Aisley’s appointment 07/09/85).

He does not discuss the details of the meeting Ainsley was calling or whether he even attended.

This tends to suggest that the police did not suspect JB at this time and/or that they had other evidence that ruled him out. Perhaps Nevill’s call? Either that or the tests proved negative and he chooses not to include this fact.

In stating that the bullet fragmented he does delineate the number of fragments. If it was fragmented, then PV20 would have to have been swapped twice. Given Taylors GER on PV20 and that blood and tissue was included, this seems unlikely.

I still believe that the fragmentation issue was a ruse to enable SC to have been capable of shooting June. A stance that EP produced at an early stage of the saga when JB was not a suspect.
PV uses carefully chosen weasel words which he then can interpret differently at various times depending on the needs of the moment.

He is a crooked evil man who ducks and weaves to protect himself with no concern for what this means for JB. He is masquerading as an impartial professional and using his position as a qualified pathologist to bend the facts.

He is trying to cover for the fact that he knew EP had accidently shot June and that he had conspired to hide this from the outset.

CAL has a lot to answer for. Her book looks like a vehicle for some to rewrite history in order to obscure their part in the framing.

Offline David1819

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 13782
Re: Further views on PV Weasel words?
« Reply #1 on: October 17, 2021, 06:30:PM »
This post is prompted by David1819’s quote regarding the actions of PV in the CAL Propaganda novel.

I am sure he would re-post it if asked.

You should familiarise yourself with PV’s statements on this site.

Statements 07/05/86 and 12/11/86.

At the meeting following autopsies (08/07/85) with all the key players present he clearly states that for JB to have been the perpetrator Sheila would have to have been drugged.  Heavy emphasis is placed on the need for a drug analysis.

In the CAL quote this aspect is completely ignored even though he mentions his reasons for wishing to test for them.

There is no evidence to support Sheila being drugged by a third party.

Despite contacts with RC he does not mention being asked for this information even though it was a key piece of information for the investigation. You would have thought that EP would be seeking this fundamental evidence verbally on a number of occasions, given its vital importance to the course of the investigation. You would think they would be chasing him because if JB was innocent it would change the focus of investigation to Sheila or some other third party. One of the contacts from RC was at least a month later (After Aisley’s appointment 07/09/85).

He does not discuss the details of the meeting Ainsley was calling or whether he even attended.

This tends to suggest that the police did not suspect JB at this time and/or that they had other evidence that ruled him out. Perhaps Nevill’s call? Either that or the tests proved negative and he chooses not to include this fact.

In stating that the bullet fragmented he does delineate the number of fragments. If it was fragmented, then PV20 would have to have been swapped twice. Given Taylors GER on PV20 and that blood and tissue was included, this seems unlikely.

I still believe that the fragmentation issue was a ruse to enable SC to have been capable of shooting June. A stance that EP produced at an early stage of the saga when JB was not a suspect.
PV uses carefully chosen weasel words which he then can interpret differently at various times depending on the needs of the moment.

He is a crooked evil man who ducks and weaves to protect himself with no concern for what this means for JB. He is masquerading as an impartial professional and using his position as a qualified pathologist to bend the facts.

He is trying to cover for the fact that he knew EP had accidently shot June and that he had conspired to hide this from the outset.

CAL has a lot to answer for. Her book looks like a vehicle for some to rewrite history in order to obscure their part in the framing.

I agree. In relatively recent correspondence between us. Jeremy refers to CAL as "Carol Ann Liar".

Offline Steve_uk

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 21102
Re: Further views on PV Weasel words?
« Reply #2 on: October 17, 2021, 07:11:PM »
I agree. In relatively recent correspondence between us. Jeremy refers to CAL as "Carol Ann Liar".
Have you read the book?

Offline Roch

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 17586
Re: Further views on PV Weasel words?
« Reply #3 on: October 17, 2021, 07:44:PM »
Have you read the book?

I read most of it. I thought it was well written but narrow in scope and very trusting of police / authorities. If you wanted her to uncover any MOJ, anywhere in the world, you would find yourself waiting for eternity.

Offline Steve_uk

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 21102
Re: Further views on PV Weasel words?
« Reply #4 on: October 17, 2021, 07:57:PM »
I read most of it. I thought it was well written but narrow in scope and very trusting of police / authorities. If you wanted her to uncover any MOJ, anywhere in the world, you would find yourself waiting for eternity.
Her book on Ruth Ellis is quite sympathetic towards her.

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48676
Re: Further views on PV Weasel words?
« Reply #5 on: October 17, 2021, 08:08:PM »
Her book on Ruth Ellis is quite sympathetic towards her.






I can remember my mother crying when it was on the radio and saying she shouldn't have been hanged.

Offline Adam

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 44395
Re: Further views on PV Weasel words?
« Reply #6 on: October 17, 2021, 08:11:PM »
I read most of it. I thought it was well written but narrow in scope and very trusting of police / authorities. If you wanted her to uncover any MOJ, anywhere in the world, you would find yourself waiting for eternity.

Did it say anything new. That is not online, on Youtube or in other books?
'Only I know what really happened that night'.

Offline Steve_uk

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 21102
Re: Further views on PV Weasel words?
« Reply #7 on: October 17, 2021, 08:25:PM »





I can remember my mother crying when it was on the radio and saying she shouldn't have been hanged.
I can remember my father saying hanging a pretty young woman marked the end of capital punishment in Britain. An extract:

The wardresses working shifts in the condemned cell expected their charge to be a hard, vulgar young woman, deceitful and brassy; that was how the popular press had portrayed her, after all. Durham-born Evelyn Galilee, employed at Holloway since 1951, was surprised by the reality:

In came this fragile girl, a Dresden doll. She was my age and tiny-no more than 5ft-and so very slim. Her skin was like porcelain. They had taken away her false nails, eyelashes and glamorous clothes and put her in baggy prison issue clothes. But they could not strip her of her dignity. Not once did she break down, scream or cry. Ruth had this acceptance of what she'd done and felt the punishment fitted the crime. Her eyes...were bewitching, the most beautiful violet-blue, the colour of forget-me-nots.

Offline Roch

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 17586
Re: Further views on PV Weasel words?
« Reply #8 on: October 17, 2021, 08:54:PM »
Did it say anything new. That is not online, on Youtube or in other books?

I can't remember Adam.

Offline Bubo bubo

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3357
Re: Further views on PV Weasel words?
« Reply #9 on: October 17, 2021, 09:07:PM »
By all means talk about books but you have let Steve UK drag you away from the topic. He is quite good at that. This a forum about JB and his MOJ. It is not to be a book club or a place for literary reviews. If you want to talk about books why not have a book thread?

I have pointed out before that PV may have already been in the pocket of the police. I quoted the Tomlinson case and the use of Mr Patel.

Have you ever wondered why a pathologist was sent from London? I cannot believe that there was no suitable pathologist at, Chelmsford, Colchester, Ipswich, Cambridge etc. who would have been closer and no ballistics expert was summoned.

A lot would depend on how pathologists were assigned to cases at that time.

Was there a register of pathologists from which SIO’s could pick.

Did they have to work through the Home Office who would allocate an available member.

Did Senior officers (who were Masons) have a list of pathologists who were also Masons.

In such a case I believe they would have sought an already compromised pathologist. Was/is he a Freemason. It is clear from his CV that he was a man with vaulting ambition eventually rising to the very highest level at the Home Office. At the start he may have seen this as an opportunity, a kind of early version of ‘Linkedin’. Access to police top brass. Called on for the more notorious cases that would raise his profile, etc.

Over the years he has become a ‘celebrity’ pathologist and regularly appears on TV documentaries.

He has no Wikipedia entry but his ‘majestic’ CV is on his website. We do not know his background. Some personal facts can be found on his Desert Island discs’ episode. (BBC sounds).

Membership of the Masonic order is by invitation only, you cannot apply. PV qualified as a pathologist in 1972 so had 13 years’ experience by the time of the WHF incident. I have no doubt that during this time he would have met many Masons at all ranks of the police force and may have been invited/asked to join. Do not forget that Maggie T had been PM for 6 years and she turned the police into her foot soldiers. Levels of Masonic membership within the police was very much higher than it is today and questions about Masonry and police membership was from time to time subject to scrutiny in the media.

If he was a Mason, he could not say no. ‘Clan’ members must help fellow brothers if it is within their gift.

If he said no he could have been invited to join the Masons.

So long as he had not put pen to paper they had time to get some ‘dirt’ on him or a relative to persuade him. Did he or his family have skeletons in the cupboard which would have adversely affected his reputation. Part of their methodology is to have intimate knowledge of members and public figures so that they can use this to blackmail and pressurise others to achieve their objectives.

They may just have appealed to his emotional side. Young officer distraught, likely to lose his job for a single understandable reflex action. Police under extreme pressure etc.

Even if they could not persuade him, all he had to do was state the facts. In this situation I am sure they would have managed. If he had not made erroneous changes to his findings to cater for the so called first shot and Sheila being able to shoot June, along with the head shot to June we would be none the wiser.

After all he may have seen the situation at that time the same as DCC Simpson, that it was a closed situation and it would just be him and the EP who really knew what had happened.

Like him however he reckoned without the Boutflour family.

This is my example of a possible reading of events. I could be wrong. He has made too many changes that I have spotted and he has had to clarify too many issues such as the cleanliness of SC’s hands for my liking.

Offline killingeve

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 299
Re: Further views on PV Weasel words?
« Reply #10 on: October 18, 2021, 08:45:AM »
I agree. In relatively recent correspondence between us. Jeremy refers to CAL as "Carol Ann Liar".

You write to Bamber  :o

What is he claiming Carol Ann Lee lied about? 

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48676
Re: Further views on PV Weasel words?
« Reply #11 on: October 18, 2021, 10:09:AM »
You write to Bamber  :o

What is he claiming Carol Ann Lee lied about?





Why not write to him ? I do, though it's been a while since I last wrote, so I'll be dropping him another line ( and not over the wall ) I send postage stamps too.

Offline JackieD

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3879
Re: Further views on PV Weasel words?
« Reply #12 on: October 18, 2021, 10:20:AM »
By all means talk about books but you have let Steve UK drag you away from the topic. He is quite good at that. This a forum about JB and his MOJ. It is not to be a book club or a place for literary reviews. If you want to talk about books why not have a book thread?

I have pointed out before that PV may have already been in the pocket of the police. I quoted the Tomlinson case and the use of Mr Patel.

Have you ever wondered why a pathologist was sent from London? I cannot believe that there was no suitable pathologist at, Chelmsford, Colchester, Ipswich, Cambridge etc. who would have been closer and no ballistics expert was summoned.

A lot would depend on how pathologists were assigned to cases at that time.

Was there a register of pathologists from which SIO’s could pick.

Did they have to work through the Home Office who would allocate an available member.

Did Senior officers (who were Masons) have a list of pathologists who were also Masons.

In such a case I believe they would have sought an already compromised pathologist. Was/is he a Freemason. It is clear from his CV that he was a man with vaulting ambition eventually rising to the very highest level at the Home Office. At the start he may have seen this as an opportunity, a kind of early version of ‘Linkedin’. Access to police top brass. Called on for the more notorious cases that would raise his profile, etc.

Over the years he has become a ‘celebrity’ pathologist and regularly appears on TV documentaries.

He has no Wikipedia entry but his ‘majestic’ CV is on his website. We do not know his background. Some personal facts can be found on his Desert Island discs’ episode. (BBC sounds).

Membership of the Masonic order is by invitation only, you cannot apply. PV qualified as a pathologist in 1972 so had 13 years’ experience by the time of the WHF incident. I have no doubt that during this time he would have met many Masons at all ranks of the police force and may have been invited/asked to join. Do not forget that Maggie T had been PM for 6 years and she turned the police into her foot soldiers. Levels of Masonic membership within the police was very much higher than it is today and questions about Masonry and police membership was from time to time subject to scrutiny in the media.

If he was a Mason, he could not say no. ‘Clan’ members must help fellow brothers if it is within their gift.

If he said no he could have been invited to join the Masons.

So long as he had not put pen to paper they had time to get some ‘dirt’ on him or a relative to persuade him. Did he or his family have skeletons in the cupboard which would have adversely affected his reputation. Part of their methodology is to have intimate knowledge of members and public figures so that they can use this to blackmail and pressurise others to achieve their objectives.

They may just have appealed to his emotional side. Young officer distraught, likely to lose his job for a single understandable reflex action. Police under extreme pressure etc.

Even if they could not persuade him, all he had to do was state the facts. In this situation I am sure they would have managed. If he had not made erroneous changes to his findings to cater for the so called first shot and Sheila being able to shoot June, along with the head shot to June we would be none the wiser.

After all he may have seen the situation at that time the same as DCC Simpson, that it was a closed situation and it would just be him and the EP who really knew what had happened.

Like him however he reckoned without the Boutflour family.

This is my example of a possible reading of events. I could be wrong. He has made too many changes that I have spotted and he has had to clarify too many issues such as the cleanliness of SC’s hands for my liking.

Spot on Bubo Steve tries to get people off topic every single time a post is in favour of JB. I am sick to death of it
Julie Mugford the main prosecution witness was guilty of numerous crimes, 13 separate cheque frauds, robbery, and drug dealing and also making a deal with a national newspaper before trial that if she could convince a jury her ex boyfriend was guilty of five murders she would receive £25,000

Offline killingeve

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 299
Re: Further views on PV Weasel words?
« Reply #13 on: October 18, 2021, 11:34:AM »

Why not write to him ? I do, though it's been a while since I last wrote, so I'll be dropping him another line ( and not over the wall ) I send postage stamps too.

Lol I bet you quite like the idea of dropping Bamber a line over the wall! 

Only a few weeks and you will no doubt receive your regular Christmas card.

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48676
Re: Further views on PV Weasel words?
« Reply #14 on: October 18, 2021, 12:27:PM »
Lol I bet you quite like the idea of dropping Bamber a line over the wall! 

Only a few weeks and you will no doubt receive your regular Christmas card.





Why not ? At least it shows he's still in the land of the living.