0 Members and 3 Guests are viewing this topic.
I've been doing searches for that. Nothing found.
It's in Colin's book
In the bin ?
That's right Maggie, he was a man, not a child - a man old enough to be a father himself. I think even at an age much younger than Bamber, I would have realised that dumping dead childrens toys in a bin bag was insensitive. If Jeremy is guilty, then his capacity to feel any empathy is redundant and wouldn't have thought twice about there being anything wrong in what he did. He probably thought he was doing Colin a favour. It's hard to express something you don't feel.
On the whole I think the drama has been interesting if a bit slow . And obviously some artistic licence with the facts . As I said they are making it quite clear Colin does not suspect jeremy and in those scenes jeremy is coming across as upset , sympathetic etc. Where as the scenes with Anne he is portrayed very differently The one big critisim I had with last night was about the window . They showed just one latch apparently dropping down when there were in fact two including the horizontal bar at the bottom . Very misleading . I totally agree with Maggies post. The reason I have not been on the forum for a while is because of a family bereavement and my relative was accused of similar lack of emotion and empathy . Which was very far from the truth . Also I know a lot of men who would not think maybe to go out and buy a suitcase or something similar to put the twins possessions in . But Steve saying they were put out for the bin men is just trying to add extra drama and hate to the situation.Julie looks as if she is being portrayed as knowing and very much an accomplice rather than a frightened confused partner. I think also considering how long we have all been involved in this you do easily forget how old jeremy and Julie were when this all happened . And of course there is a possibility that even if jeremy was innocent he may have been in a state of shock grief plus an unexpected realisation that he was A very rich young man and perhaps because he was adopted he did not have the same love and connection with his family .
I do think a young man has different ways of recognising and dealing with emotions than a young woman, their brains are wired differently and they bury their feelings and cut off emotions in a way women cannot. Was told recently by a friend who is a hypnotherapist and counsellor that’s not only were male and female brains are wired differently but that they are anotomivally different when a cross section is compared.
How many people do that though when a family member dies ? Quite a lot I bet . Clear stuff for charity when they are ready and put it in bin bags . I know and auntie who did that with her husbands clothes . Some people like to keep things around them others don’t . I think people are trying to read too much into actions that are a perception rather than evidence and then everyone gets drawn in to prove a point .
Nobody can " play " at being shocked ! What a stupid comment. Where do you think PTSD comes from years later with the likes of service people or those who've been involved in a trauma ? You can only remain to be stoical for so long if you're kept occupied in some way such as Jeremy is in his quest for freedom then the nightmare appears when it's all over.
If you're looking for a stupid comment - look no further than yours above. I'm not talking about service men! Anyone can act shocked! Actors do so all of the time or do you think the director makes them suffer PTSD first?
Yet another nonsensical reply
