Jeremy Bamber Forum
JEREMY BAMBER CASE => Jeremy Bamber Case Discussion => Topic started by: mike tesko on December 26, 2017, 12:31:PM
-
Why is David Boutflour almost always smiling when he discusses anything about this awful tragedy?
He laughs, he laughs and he laughs...
-
Why is David Boutflour almost always smiling when he discusses anything about this awful tragedy?
He laughs, he laughs and he laughs...
Not the most photogenic bloke ever! ;D
-
I've wondered about that too. ???
-
You can't blame a man for smiling once in a while. Do you expect him to be melancholic for the rest of his life?
-
You can't blame a man for smiling once in a while. Do you expect him to be melancholic for the rest of his life?
I imagine Mike probably thinks he should be wearing a shirt made of stinging nettles, liberally sprinkled with itching powder.
-
I think there's a tinge of nerves in his mannerisms. There's a reason why he's often bluffing it out in the media. He's a stakeholder in Jeremy's conviction - and quite a big one (due to his actions). He's trying to convince the audience that is the public, that there was and is a soundness to Jeremy's conviction - but his motivation for doing so is self-preservation. It's an attempt at justifying himself.
-
I think there's a tinge of nerves in his mannerisms. There's a reason why he's often bluffing it out in the media. He's a stakeholder in Jeremy's conviction - and quite a big one (due to his actions). He's trying to convince the audience that is the public, that there was and is a soundness to Jeremy's conviction - but his motivation for doing so is self-preservation. It's an attempt at justifying himself.
Or he just find being in front of a camera - awkward
-
I think there's a tinge of nerves in his mannerisms. There's a reason why he's often bluffing it out in the media. He's a stakeholder in Jeremy's conviction - and quite a big one (due to his actions). He's trying to convince the audience that is the public, that there was and is a soundness to Jeremy's conviction - but his motivation for doing so is self-preservation. It's an attempt at justifying himself.
Do you believe the relatives approached the police or the police approached the relatives, with the silencer fabrication idea ?
-
Or he just find being in front of a camera - awkward
Nah, he's been in front of too many cameras too many times.
-
Do you believe the relatives approached the police or the police approached the relatives, with the silencer fabrication idea ?
I don't know. But your repeated fascination with this particular question intrigues me.
-
Or he just find being in front of a camera - awkward
I don't think David was ever the strong one in the family. Ann definitely came over as being the proverbial "chip off the old block" but David -since his father's illness and death- has been pushed into position of spokesperson. It clearly doesn't sit easily with him.
-
I don't know. But your repeated fascination with this particular question intrigues me.
Did the evidence you have not give a suggestion either way ?
-
Did the evidence you have not give a suggestion either way ?
I don't have any evidence that indicates either police or relatives instigated the sound moderator 'fraud'. I suspect the relatives' sought advice via Stan Jones, who would in turn have been able to consult Ron Cook. Perhaps pointers were conveyed by police to relatives and thus a plan of action was concocted.
-
Nah, he's been in front of too many cameras too many times.
That doesn't have anything to do with it - once or one hundred would make it easier if he isn't comfortable. The man looks uncomfortable and has a slight stutter. It's easy to see why he might not like being a spokesperson.
-
I think there's a tinge of nerves in his mannerisms. There's a reason why he's often bluffing it out in the media. He's a stakeholder in Jeremy's conviction - and quite a big one (due to his actions). He's trying to convince the audience that is the public, that there was and is a soundness to Jeremy's conviction - but his motivation for doing so is self-preservation. It's an attempt at justifying himself.
I absolutely agree with everything written in this post. Didn't he also quote somewhere 'all the money had been spent anyway'