Jeremy Bamber Forum

JEREMY BAMBER CASE => Jeremy Bamber Case Discussion => Topic started by: mike tesko on December 17, 2017, 01:34:AM

Title: Very, very, disturbing features of evidence - alarm bells are ringing...
Post by: mike tesko on December 17, 2017, 01:34:AM
It is a shocking understatement...

If there was only the one silencer / sound moderator / suppressor involved in this police (or these police) investigations, then why does there exist reference to two relatives handing over one of these to Essex police on both the 12th August 1985 (Peter Eaton to Stan Jones), and the 11th September 1985 (Ann Eaton to DC Oakey)?
Title: Re: Very, very, disturbing features of evidence - alarm bells are ringing...
Post by: mike tesko on December 17, 2017, 01:37:AM
Quote from: mike tesko on December 17, 2017, 01:34:AM
It is a shocking understatement...

If there was only the one silencer / sound moderator / suppressor involved in this police (or these police) investigations, then why does there exist reference to two relatives handing over one of these to Essex police on both the 12th August 1985 (Peter Eaton to Stan Jones), and the 11th September 1985 (Ann Eaton to DC Oakey)?

I am a victim of police corruption and dishonesty - so please don't try to tell me how to evaluate the facts...
Title: Re: Very, very, disturbing features of evidence - alarm bells are ringing...
Post by: mike tesko on December 17, 2017, 01:39:AM
There is clear evidence, that the relatives, Essex police officers, and Lab' experts have set out to deliberately deceive the court which tried Jeremy Bamber for the murders, by claiming that there was only the one silencer, the one sound moderator, the one gun suppressor...

There wasn't...

It's all been a pack of lies!