Jeremy Bamber Forum
OFF TOPIC => General => Topic started by: Roch on November 03, 2017, 12:10:PM
-
https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2017/nov/03/priti-patel-held-undisclosed-meetings-israel
I've never liked her since she sided with the self-preservationist Bamber relatives and muzzled Jeremy Bamber from speaking out.
Awful woman.
-
https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2017/nov/03/priti-patel-held-undisclosed-meetings-israel
I've never liked her since she sided with the self-preservationist Bamber relatives and muzzled Jeremy Bamber from speaking out.
Awful woman.
Don't like her either but she didn't do a very good job of muzzling! ;D
-
Don't like her either but she didn't do a very good job of muzzling! ;D
I think it was in connection to a telephone / radio interview. At least we agree on something :))
-
I think it's shameful that people like her and Whittingdale,both of who blackened JB's name,without knowing anything about him,should be allowed to keep their highly paid jobs ! Whittingdale having had a fling with a porn star as well as having told " secrets " of his position and Patel with her rank lies.
Why are they still in a job ?? Those who support the woman have something to hide themselves.
Those who talk/speak about others ALWAYS hide a dark secret themselves and they think that by opening up about others it justifies their own shortcomings. EVIL !
-
Lookout Mrs Patel could be on her way today
Thank goodness
-
I think it's shameful that people like her and Whittingdale,both of who blackened JB's name,without knowing anything about him,should be allowed to keep their highly paid jobs ! Whittingdale having had a fling with a porn star as well as having told " secrets " of his position and Patel with her rank lies.
Why are they still in a job ?? Those who support the woman have something to hide themselves.
Those who talk/speak about others ALWAYS hide a dark secret themselves and they think that by opening up about others it justifies their own shortcomings. EVIL !
HOW is it possible to blacken Jeremy Bamber's name? Please! ::)
-
Lookout Mrs Patel could be on her way today
Thank goodness
Would you even care had she not made comments on Bamber? Do you even know what she recently did?
-
You obviously don't know yourself
Big Secrets and even secret talks usually come out in the end
-
You obviously don't know yourself
Big Secrets and even secret talks usually come out in the end
I can tell you what she didn't talk about - BAMBER!
-
She's just resigned.
-
She's just resigned.
I think she was told to.
-
She's just resigned.
Hoorah
-
Would you even care had she not made comments on Bamber? Do you even know what she recently did?
Smearing her because she previously made comments about Bamber is crazy. ;D
She deserved to get the boot for her odd behaviour (for clarification I AM talking about Patel) ;D
-
Still there as a back-bencher though,so nose remains in the trough ! I prefer these people to be out on their ears----------------------with nothing ! Like the ordinary man in the street would be.
-
Still there as a back-bencher though,so nose remains in the trough ! I prefer these people to be out on their ears----------------------with nothing ! Like the ordinary man in the street would be.
She's an elected politician though - elected by her constituency.
-
She's an elected politician though - elected by her constituency.
Yes and the right of recall pledge mooted a few years ago was conveniently ditched.
-
Still there as a back-bencher though,so nose remains in the trough ! I prefer these people to be out on their ears----------------------with nothing ! Like the ordinary man in the street would be.
Not happy until it's sack cloth and ashes outside the food bank with her Aldi big shopper eh Lookout? ;D
-
Smearing her because she previously made comments about Bamber is crazy. ;D
She deserved to get the boot for her odd behaviour (for clarification I AM talking about Patel) ;D
How apt that you should pop up just now.
Patel was a liar, she was asked to come clean and she didn't
She turned out to be an embarrassment to May.
Just desserts for trying to stop publicity about the Bamber case
-
How apt that you should pop up just now.
Patel was a liar, she was asked to come clean and she didn't
She turned out to be an embarrassment to May.
Just desserts for trying to stop publicity about the Bamber case
Pop up just now? I've been here weeks. Saying its "Just desserts" for the Bamber case is odd. This has nothing to do with the Bamber case and taking joy in someones downfall just because that person once, on your opinion, dared slight Bamber... weird.
-
Pop up just now? I've been here weeks. Saying its "Just desserts" for the Bamber case is odd. This has nothing to do with the Bamber case and taking joy in someones downfall just because that person once, on your opinion, dared slight Bamber... weird.
Some people take the opinion that she sided with a bunch of people who helped 'frame' a relative. You yourself made an odd remark about the silencer recently - and then failed to respond when asked for clarification.
-
Some people take the opinion that she sided with a bunch of people who helped 'frame' a relative. You yourself made an odd remark about the silencer recently - and then failed to respond when asked for clarification.
Which has nothing to do with this story.
And Roch. YOU are accusing ME or failing to respond when asked for clarification. There's no way you typed that with a straight face after the things you've been posting lately.
Any post I've missed is because I was away for three nights over bonfire night -but since you put is so kindly I'll go back and check.
-
Which has nothing to do with this story.
And Roch. YOU are accusing ME or failing to respond when asked for clarification. There's no way you typed that with a straight face after the things you've been posting lately.
Any post I've missed is because I was away for three nights over bonfire night -but since you put is so kindly I'll go back and check.
I try to clarify as far as circumstances will allow.
-
I've always said that he knows they've got the silencer evidence wrong which is why he tries to get his teams to concentrate on it.
I take it this is the post. If you thought, like I do, that Bamber is guilty, you'd understand the post I guess. I've always been curious as to Bambers actions with the silencer because over time he's dropped things when they haven't stuck, such as changing pronouns around with the alleged call from his dad "sheila, she." But the silencer has pretty much stayed at the forefront of his arguements.
Not with the CT or even many supporters but with his legal team and in Bambers own letters, the silencer is something often talked about alot.
He obviously knows the full story with it. We're left to piece it together after the fact.
-
I take it this is the post. If you thought, like I do, that Bamber is guilty, you'd understand the post I guess. I've always been curious as to Bambers actions with the silencer because over time he's dropped things when they haven't stuck, such as changing pronouns around with the alleged call from his dad "sheila, she." But the silencer has pretty much stayed at the forefront of his arguements.
Not with the CT or even many supporters but with his legal team and in Bambers own letters, the silencer is something often talked about alot.
He obviously knows the full story with it. We're left to piece it together after the fact.
Pretty much my thoughts too.
I find this thread quite amusing, people aren't so much bothered about PP's recent political guff and it wouldn't have even made it onto the forum if she hadn't once condemned Bamber. Tut, tut!
-
Anyone described by the Israeli administration as a 'true friend' is likely to be viewed as potentially suspect in some way or form. I started this thread so that was what I was implying. When Baroness Warsi resigned, she said George Osborne was a 'great friend of Israel'. It was never mentioned again in the news.
Mat has claimed to come from a background linked to CCRC and claimed t o be knowledgeable about the case from that kind of perspective. Unless, I have misunderstood, Mat also implied recently, that the silencer evidence is dodgy (something that Caroline has openly expressed). I wonder if Mat has passed on his own concerns to the CCRC, regarding the validity of the silencer? Unless of course, Mat is implying that it's an acceptable situation, to have Bamber incarcerated on the basis of dodgy silencer evidence? That hardly says much for the CCRC though does it?
Getting back to Patel - if like Caroline and Mat, you believe the silencer evidence is dodgy, then surely it must be reaslised that what Patel did, was to intervene on the part of the people who came up with that very evidence.
-
Anyone described by the Israeli administration as a 'true friend' is likely to be viewed as potentially suspect in some way or form. I started this thread so that was what I was implying. When Baroness Warsi resigned, she said George Osborne was a 'great friend of Israel'. It was never mentioned again in the news.
Mat has claimed to come from a background linked to CCRC and claimed t o be knowledgeable about the case from that kind of perspective. Unless, I have misunderstood, Mat also implied recently, that the silencer evidence is dodgy (something that Caroline has openly expressed). I wonder if Mat has passed on his own concerns to the CCRC, regarding the validity of the silencer? Unless of course, Mat is implying that it's an acceptable situation, to have Bamber incarcerated on the basis of dodgy silencer evidence? That hardly says much for the CCRC though does it?
Getting back to Patel - if like Caroline and Mat, you believe the silencer evidence is dodgy, then surely it must be reaslised that what Patel did, was to intervene on the part of the people who came up with that very evidence.
I said that Bamber knows the full story, we don't. You've turned that into a full story of me thinking the evidence is dodgy. That's not what I said. You need to stop twisting things. Your post is dishonest.
The silencer evidence with the blood is way above my personal understanding and Bamber fixates on it.
In fact, I don't know who has been feeding you such rubbish behind the scenes - but your posts have been outlandish lately. Phantom marks on Sheila and now on June is the point I should have stopped conversing with you.
You've become a puppet for someone and whoever is feeding you these little bits BECAUSE I DONT THINK YOU'RE MAKING THEM UP, i do think you've genuinely been told things, knows that you will repeat them because you've been dropping so many comments left right and centre. But still a puppet? Shame on you Roch.
-
I said that Bamber knows the full story, we don't. You've turned that into a full story of me thinking the evidence is dodgy. That's not what I said. You need to stop twisting things. Your post is dishonest.
The silencer evidence with the blood is way above my personal understanding and Bamber fixates on it.
In fact, I don't know who has been feeding you such rubbish behind the scenes - but your posts have been outlandish lately. Phantom marks on Sheila and now on June is the point I should have stopped conversing with you.
You've become a puppet for someone and whoever is feeinf you these little bits BECAUSE I DONT THINK YOU'RE MAKING THEM UP, i do think you've genuinely been told things, knowss that you will repeat them. But still a puppet? Shame on your Roch.
Of course I'm not making them up. If you bother to trawl back through my posts, you will see I have provided detailed descriptions of the various wounds in question. I've also started threads accordingly. Puppets don't come in to it - it's all about crime scene images. And as I have tried to point out to my fellow members - case debate and discoveries have outgrown the poor definition images we are saddled with on the forum. That is simply a fact.
-
Of course I'm not making them up. If you bother to trawl back through my posts, you will see I have provided detailed descriptions of the various wounds in question. I've also started threads accordingly. Puppets don't come in to it - it's all about crime scene images. And as I have tried to point out to my fellow members - case debate and discoveries have outgrown the poor definition images we are saddled with on the forum. That is simply a fact.
Okay, Roch, but you haven't seen them.... and it's quite sad to see so many, including myself, scoff at you for putting your neck on the line in the way you have lately.
Out of the little genuine bit of respect I have left for you. I'm going to put you on ignore.
-
Okay, Roch, but you haven't seen them.... and it's quite sad to see so many, including myself, scoff at you for putting your neck on the line in the way you have lately.
Out of the little genuine bit of respect I have left for you. I'm going to put you on ignore.
You don't know what I've seen or what I haven't seen. If you put me on ignore that's fine. I will just consider that as you running away from the debate.
-
Not happy until it's sack cloth and ashes outside the food bank with her Aldi big shopper eh Lookout? ;D
;D ::)
-
Pretty much my thoughts too.
I find this thread quite amusing, people aren't so much bothered about PP's recent political guff and it wouldn't have even made it onto the forum if she hadn't once condemned Bamber. Tut, tut!
the title proves they are.
I dident know she had anything to do with this case.
-
Pop up just now? I've been here weeks. Saying its "Just desserts" for the Bamber case is odd. This has nothing to do with the Bamber case and taking joy in someones downfall just because that person once, on your opinion, dared slight Bamber... weird.
thats not what i said and you know it
she tried to stop publicity around the case
-
Anyone described by the Israeli administration as a 'true friend' is likely to be viewed as potentially suspect in some way or form. I started this thread so that was what I was implying. When Baroness Warsi resigned, she said George Osborne was a 'great friend of Israel'. It was never mentioned again in the news.
Mat has claimed to come from a background linked to CCRC and claimed t o be knowledgeable about the case from that kind of perspective. Unless, I have misunderstood, Mat also implied recently, that the silencer evidence is dodgy (something that Caroline has openly expressed). I wonder if Mat has passed on his own concerns to the CCRC, regarding the validity of the silencer? Unless of course, Mat is implying that it's an acceptable situation, to have Bamber incarcerated on the basis of dodgy silencer evidence? That hardly says much for the CCRC though does it?
Getting back to Patel - if like Caroline and Mat, you believe the silencer evidence is dodgy, then surely it must be reaslised that what Patel did, was to intervene on the part of the people who came up with that very evidence.
thank you Roch and a perfect response
-
priti patel has proved she is dishonest
fact
i wonder how 'close' she was to the relatives
maybe as close as the police were to the relatives
-
Not happy until it's sack cloth and ashes outside the food bank with her Aldi big shopper eh Lookout? ;D
well i certanly wont be that applys to the rest of the cabinet as well.