Jeremy Bamber Forum
JEREMY BAMBER CASE => Jeremy Bamber Case Discussion => Topic started by: sherlock on October 27, 2017, 11:53:PM
-
Watch this BBC clip and play spot the slip of the tongue !!!
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/av/uk-england-essex-17855823/jeremy-bamber-s-cousin-welcomes-appeal-ruling
Guilty conscience clearly at work - having a conscience at least shows David is not a psychopath !!!
Not being a psychopath ruled him out of the murders in my opinion ...
Whether you believe Jeremy innocent or guilty you surely have to wonder what David's blatant slip of the tongue is about in that video clip ...
-
Watch this BBC clip and play spot the slip of the tongue !!!
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/av/uk-england-essex-17855823/jeremy-bamber-s-cousin-welcomes-appeal-ruling
Guilty conscience clearly at work - having a conscience at least shows David is not a psychopath !!!
Not being a psychopath ruled him out of the murders in my opinion ...
Whether you believe Jeremy innocent or guilty you surely have to wonder what David's blatant slip of the tongue is about in that video clip ...
Please enlighten us with your deer stalking greatness! What slip of the tongue?
-
Watch this BBC clip and play spot the slip of the tongue !!!
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/av/uk-england-essex-17855823/jeremy-bamber-s-cousin-welcomes-appeal-ruling
Guilty conscience clearly at work - having a conscience at least shows David is not a psychopath !!!
Not being a psychopath ruled him out of the murders in my opinion ...
Whether you believe Jeremy innocent or guilty you surely have to wonder what David's blatant slip of the tongue is about in that video clip ...
"we think he's guilty" ? :-\
-
"we think he's guilty" ? :-\
So? They 'think' 'believe' - how is that a slip of the tongue? I think he's guilty too ???
At worst I'd say he looks flustered but he's most likely just nervous about being interviewed and being aware that whatever he said, is likely to end up on here being scrutinised ;D
-
So? They 'think' 'believe' - how is that a slip of the tongue? I think he's guilty too ???
At worst I'd say he looks flustered but he's most likely just nervous about being interviewed and being aware that whatever he said, is likely to end up on here being scrutinised ;D
If what he has said in the past is true shouldn't he know he is guilty? ???
-
If what he has said in the past is true shouldn't he know he is guilty? ???
Not really. he was't there so all he can have is a belief.
-
I seem to recall that another poster here accused Julie of the same faux pas, highlighting that she said "I still think/believe? he did it" rather than, in THEIR opinion, if she was telling the truth, "I KNOW he did it" If none of us is there when "IT" -whatever "IT" is- occurred, the very most we can honestly say is that we think/believe it occurred.
-
thats intresting becouse those were the words bews used as well.
-
thats intresting becouse those were the words bews used as well.
Bews wasn't there, was he, ergo, his statement is factually correct.
-
If Bews had been the ordinary man in the street would you still be saying that ??
-
Bews wasn't there, was he, ergo, his statement is factually correct.
thinking implys your not certan i would sort of expect the police and the relatives to be a bit more confident they were right.
-
thinking implys your not certan i would sort of expect the police and the relatives to be a bit more confident they were right.
No. Unless uncertainty is specified, think and believe are interchangeable. I'd also point out that only a fraction of society is cognitive enough about English usage to know what's strictly applicable.
-
So? They 'think' 'believe' - how is that a slip of the tongue? I think he's guilty too ???
At worst I'd say he looks flustered but he's most likely just nervous about being interviewed and being aware that whatever he said, is likely to end up on here being scrutinised ;D
The word " think " is neither here nor there,without the emphaticism of the word " KNOW ".!
-
normaly they say I know hes guilty or hes guilty.
-
The word " think " is neither here nor there,without the emphaticism of the word " KNOW ".!
And NO ONE can truthfully be said to 'KNOW' anything unless they were present. All they can have is thought/belief......................other than those who know they know everything.
-
normaly they say I know hes guilty or hes guilty.
That's right and a more positive belief rather than saying " I think " which is all my eye as it leaves an element of uncertainty and wavering. It's certainly no good using the word " think " in a court of law.
-
That's right and a more positive belief rather than saying " I think " which is all my eye as it leaves an element of uncertainty and wavering. It's certainly no good using the word " think " in a court of law.
WE aren't in "a court of law". Neither were Julie, David, or Bews when they used that expression. In fact, I don't recall that they ever said such words when they WERE in court. Such words were never in their remit. The jury -well, 10 of them- thought/believed he was guilty. They weren't at WHF when it occurred, so HOW could they have KNOWN?
-
That's right and a more positive belief rather than saying " I think " which is all my eye as it leaves an element of uncertainty and wavering. It's certainly no good using the word " think " in a court of law.
well from a prosecution witness wold expect a tiny bit more certainty.
-
well from a prosecution witness wold expect a tiny bit more certainty.
At what point during court proceedings was it required of Julie, David or Bews to make the statement "I think/believe Jeremy is guilty"?
-
Think it's time for this to stop.
I am locking the thread for now. Please don't continue it on another thread. Thanks