Jeremy Bamber Forum

JEREMY BAMBER CASE => Jeremy Bamber Case Discussion => Topic started by: Hartley on May 13, 2011, 10:47:AM

Title: 2009 Court Hearing Judgement
Post by: Hartley on May 13, 2011, 10:47:AM
Another one for your reading list.  ;)
Title: Re: 2009 Court Hearing Judgement
Post by: lebaleb on May 13, 2011, 06:34:PM
It seems that in Britain if you can persuade 10 people of something, then that becomes a fact.
Title: Re: 2009 Court Hearing Judgement
Post by: Hartley on May 13, 2011, 06:43:PM
It seems that in Britain if you can persuade 10 people of something, then that becomes a fact.

Yes that's about the size of it, but then there are various processes in place to question that 'fact' such as the court of appeal.
Title: Re: 2009 Court Hearing Judgement
Post by: grahameb on May 13, 2011, 06:48:PM
Well just another monstrous ruling by the corrupt law lords of this land. If JB finds it so difficult to get an appeal how is it that these men can find it so easy to increase his sentence to a whole life tarriff at a blink of an eye. Even the report of the trial was inaccurate. I wonder if their riling is against the law itself? How can just a few men change the duration of a person's sentence at their whim?
Title: Re: 2009 Court Hearing Judgement
Post by: grahameb on May 13, 2011, 06:49:PM
It seems that in Britain if you can persuade 10 people of something, then that becomes a fact.

Yes that's about the size of it, but then there are various processes in place to question that 'fact' such as the court of appeal.
If you can get one.
Title: Re: 2009 Court Hearing Judgement
Post by: Alias on May 13, 2011, 06:50:PM
Well just another monstrous ruling by the corrupt law lords of this land. If JB finds it so difficult to get an appeal how is it that these men can find it so easy to increase his sentence to a whole life tarriff at a blink of an eye. Even the report of the trial was inaccurate. I wonder if their riling is against the law itself? How can just a few men change the duration of a person's sentence at their whim?

Good post. +1
Title: Re: 2009 Court Hearing Judgement
Post by: Hartley on May 13, 2011, 06:53:PM
Well just another monstrous ruling by the corrupt law lords of this land. If JB finds it so difficult to get an appeal how is it that these men can find it so easy to increase his sentence to a whole life tarriff at a blink of an eye. Even the report of the trial was inaccurate. I wonder if their riling is against the law itself? How can just a few men change the duration of a person's sentence at their whim?

Yes it does seem like a bit too much power in just a few peoples hands. What I wasn't aware of and I think is really bad, is the delay in notifying the convicted of the change in tariff.
Title: Re: 2009 Court Hearing Judgement
Post by: Hartley on May 13, 2011, 06:54:PM
It seems that in Britain if you can persuade 10 people of something, then that becomes a fact.

Yes that's about the size of it, but then there are various processes in place to question that 'fact' such as the court of appeal.
If you can get one.
Indeed.
Title: Re: 2009 Court Hearing Judgement
Post by: No-Bits on September 10, 2014, 11:01:PM
Bump

Just in case people haven't read this.

(I don't start too many threads lol  :D )