Jeremy Bamber Forum
JEREMY BAMBER CASE => Jeremy Bamber Case Discussion => Topic started by: Roch on September 03, 2016, 10:40:PM
-
About the copies claimed to have come to attention 2016; having come in to the possession of official campaigners in 2011; and after having been disclosed some time after the 2002 Appeal.
There must be a reason why the copies were not raised up for attention earlier? Although - I understand there have been mountains of documents that have been disclosed in this case.
-
About the copies claimed to have come to attention 2016; having come in to the possession of official campaigners in 2011; and after having been disclosed some time after the 2002 Appeal.
There must be a reason why the copies were not raised up for attention earlier? Although - I understand there have been mountains of documents that have been disclosed in this case.
The documents released after 2002 was after his appeal failed. They would not release it before hand in order to deny an effective appeal.
Also more documents would enable Jeremy to make more complaints against police
-
Oh,goodness.Sorry Roch,I didn't know you'd also done this one.
-
I've got a feeling that I've got copies of these letters.Copies that I did from somewhere. I remember having to decipher and re-write what was written.
-
The documents released after 2002 was after his appeal failed. They would not release it before hand in order to deny an effective appeal.
Also more documents would enable Jeremy to make more complaints against police
Yeah - but I meant - why has it taken so long for the copies to come to prominence in the eyes of the campaign (given what is being alleged of their content and the length of time the copies have been available)?
Oh,goodness.Sorry Roch,I didn't know you'd also done this one.
No need to apologise. I would tread with caution though - as things tend to get dismantled one way or another.