Jeremy Bamber Forum

JEREMY BAMBER CASE => Jeremy Bamber Case Discussion => Topic started by: mike tesko on June 21, 2016, 11:26:AM

Title: 'MIND' Incorporated (2016) - questions needing an answer to in investigation?
Post by: mike tesko on June 21, 2016, 11:26:AM
(1) - did Jeremy Bamber receive a 'fair trial'?
Title: Re: 'MIND' Incorporated (2016) - questions needing an answer to in investigation?
Post by: mike tesko on June 21, 2016, 11:27:AM
(2) - Has Jeremy Bamber tried to deceive us?
Title: Re: 'MIND' Incorporated (2016) - questions needing an answer to in investigation?
Post by: mike tesko on June 21, 2016, 11:28:AM
(3) - Is Jeremy Bamber, the vile murdering 'bastard' that the prosecution have alleged?
Title: Re: 'MIND' Incorporated (2016) - questions needing an answer to in investigation?
Post by: mike tesko on June 21, 2016, 11:30:AM
(4) - Did Jeremy set out to deceive the police into thinking that his sister had shot and killed the others, and then, herself?
Title: Re: 'MIND' Incorporated (2016) - questions needing an answer to in investigation?
Post by: mike tesko on June 21, 2016, 11:31:AM
(5) - Is Jeremy Bamber callous?
Title: Re: 'MIND' Incorporated (2016) - questions needing an answer to in investigation?
Post by: mike tesko on June 21, 2016, 11:32:AM
(6) - Was Jeremy, a cruel person?
Title: Re: 'MIND' Incorporated (2016) - questions needing an answer to in investigation?
Post by: mike tesko on June 21, 2016, 11:33:AM
(7) - Does Jeremy show classic signs of using others, and or, manipulating them?
Title: Re: 'MIND' Incorporated (2016) - questions needing an answer to in investigation?
Post by: mike tesko on June 21, 2016, 11:33:AM
(8) - Is Jeremy, a psychopath?
Title: Re: 'MIND' Incorporated (2016) - questions needing an answer to in investigation?
Post by: mike tesko on June 21, 2016, 11:35:AM
(9) - If Jeremy is a psychopath, how does this prove that he had killed his family, and tried to put the blame on his sister?
Title: Re: 'MIND' Incorporated (2016) - questions needing an answer to in investigation?
Post by: mike tesko on June 21, 2016, 11:36:AM
(10) - Did Jeremy receive a telephone call from his dad, as alleged?
Title: Re: 'MIND' Incorporated (2016) - questions needing an answer to in investigation?
Post by: mike tesko on June 21, 2016, 11:40:AM
(11) - Did Jeremy attempt to call his dad back, after the call was unexpectedly and inexplicably cut short?
Title: Re: 'MIND' Incorporated (2016) - questions needing an answer to in investigation?
Post by: mike tesko on June 21, 2016, 11:41:AM
(12) - What would you have done, if you had received such a call in the middle of the night?
Title: Re: 'MIND' Incorporated (2016) - questions needing an answer to in investigation?
Post by: mike tesko on June 21, 2016, 11:43:AM
(13) - In the circumstances of the case, would you have dialled 999, and if so why?
Title: Re: 'MIND' Incorporated (2016) - questions needing an answer to in investigation?
Post by: mike tesko on June 21, 2016, 11:48:AM
(14) - If, after eventually contacting Chelmsford police station, you had been requested to go to the scene, but that you must not approach the farmhouse, prior to being met there by cops who had been deployed to meet him there, would you have got in your car and driven like a 'bat out of hell', to get to the farmhouse, in the knowledge that by so doing you would arrive at the scene long before the cops who had been deployed there, from Chelmsford, not Witham, would arrive, there?
Title: Re: 'MIND' Incorporated (2016) - questions needing an answer to in investigation?
Post by: mike tesko on June 21, 2016, 11:58:AM
(15) - how would you know at what stage access to the farmhouse would be made after the first arrival of the cops to the scene?
Title: Re: 'MIND' Incorporated (2016) - questions needing an answer to in investigation?
Post by: mike tesko on June 21, 2016, 12:01:PM
(16) - what would you have made of the sighting of a ''silhouetted figure' moving across the main bedroom window on the first approach to view the farmhouse?
Title: Re: 'MIND' Incorporated (2016) - questions needing an answer to in investigation?
Post by: mike tesko on June 21, 2016, 12:03:PM
(17) - why would you 'accuse the police of shooting your family dead', upon the news being broken to you at just after 8.10am, that all your family had been found shot dead inside the farmhouse?
Title: Re: 'MIND' Incorporated (2016) - questions needing an answer to in investigation?
Post by: mike tesko on June 21, 2016, 12:09:PM
(18) - why would you go to the trouble of trying to conceal a silencer in the gun cupboard, without 'making sure' that there was 'not' any incriminating evidence upon it, or inside it?
Title: Re: 'MIND' Incorporated (2016) - questions needing an answer to in investigation?
Post by: mike tesko on June 21, 2016, 12:11:PM
(19) - why would you include the presence of a .22 (Bruno) bolt action rifle, as being present inside the farmhouse, if such a weapon had not been there?
Title: Re: 'MIND' Incorporated (2016) - questions needing an answer to in investigation?
Post by: mike tesko on June 21, 2016, 12:12:PM
'Ponder', take your time and 'ponder', questions such as these, and 'many more to follow'...
Title: Re: 'MIND' Incorporated (2016) - questions needing an answer to in investigation?
Post by: Caroline on June 21, 2016, 12:17:PM
(14) - If, after eventually contacting Chelmsford police station, you had been requested to go to the scene, but that you must not approach the farmhouse, prior to being met there by cops who had been deployed to meet him there, would you have got in your car and driven like a 'bat out of hell', to get to the farmhouse, in the knowledge that by so doing you would arrive at the scene long before the cops who had been deployed there, from Chelmsford, not Witham, would arrive, there?

If I thought my family were in danger? Too right I would - wouldn't you?
Title: Re: 'MIND' Incorporated (2016) - questions needing an answer to in investigation?
Post by: guest7363 on June 21, 2016, 12:42:PM
(14) - If, after eventually contacting Chelmsford police station, you had been requested to go to the scene, but that you must not approach the farmhouse, prior to being met there by cops who had been deployed to meet him there, would you have got in your car and driven like a 'bat out of hell', to get to the farmhouse, in the knowledge that by so doing you would arrive at the scene long before the cops who had been deployed there, from Chelmsford, not Witham, would arrive, there?
I think I would phone my girlfriend in London first @ 3.00am, get her out of bed, wake everyone up and get her advice and then treat it as none urgent
Title: Re: 'MIND' Incorporated (2016) - questions needing an answer to in investigation?
Post by: sami on June 21, 2016, 01:08:PM
I think I would phone my girlfriend in London first @ 3.00am, get her out of bed, wake everyone up and get her advice and then treat it as none urgent
;) :)) :)) :))
Title: Re: 'MIND' Incorporated (2016) - questions needing an answer to in investigation?
Post by: Jane on June 21, 2016, 01:23:PM
I think I would phone my girlfriend in London first @ 3.00am, get her out of bed, wake everyone up and get her advice and then treat it as none urgent


Sit back, smoke a Hamlet or roll a spliff?
Title: Re: 'MIND' Incorporated (2016) - questions needing an answer to in investigation?
Post by: Caroline on June 21, 2016, 01:32:PM
I think I would phone my girlfriend in London first @ 3.00am, get her out of bed, wake everyone up and get her advice and then treat it as none urgent


 ;D ;D ;D ;D
Title: Re: 'MIND' Incorporated (2016) - questions needing an answer to in investigation?
Post by: sami on June 21, 2016, 10:41:PM
 my answer is YES to the first 8 questions,mike :)